Advertisement

Drag Effectiveness of Supercavitating Underwater Hulls

  • Igor Nesteruk
Chapter

Abstract

The important problem of the drag reduction of underwater hulls was investigated analytically and numerically. The axisymmetric flows of the ideal and the viscous fluid were used. Different effectiveness criteria, such as: the volumetric drag coefficient, the drag coefficients, based on the maximum body cross-section area and the squared hull length, and the ranges of the inertial motion were applied.

The use of known analytic dependences for the slender axisymmetric cavity shapes after the slender or the non-slender cavitators, it was shown that the value of the volumetric drag coefficient and the similar coefficients, based on the squared values of the length and the caliber, can sufficiently be reduced at small cavitation numbers. The smallest values of these drag coefficients correspond to the largest aspect ratios and the slender cavitators. Comparison of the drags of the supercavitating and unseparated flow patterns showed the existence of the critical values of the volume and dimensions. The supercavitating flow pattern is preferable for the values of these parameters smaller than critical ones. The need of the buoyancy force compensation sufficiently diminishes the critical values of the vehicle volume or its dimensions, which achieve maximum at a certain value of the motion velocity. In the case of the base cavity existence, the estimations of the supercavitating hull pressure drag and the comparison with the unseparated flow pattern are presented. The critical values of the body volume have a maximum at a certain value of the movement velocity and drastically increase with the aspect ratio increasing.

Maximum range problems are considered for the supercavitating motion of the axisymmetric body on inertia under an arbitrary angle to horizon. Different isoperimetric problems were formulated and solved with the fixed values of the body mass, kinetic energy, aspect ratio and caliber. Analytic and numeric solutions for the maximal range and the optimal body shapes are obtained. It was shown that infinite small exceeding some critical value of the initial depth can cause a jump of the range and coming to the water surface. The corresponding values of the critical initial depth are calculated.

Keywords

Drag Coefficient Critical Volume Cavitation Number Pressure Drag Isoperimetric Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Logvinovich GV. Hydrodynamics of Flows with Free Boundaries. Kiev: Naukova Dumka; 1969. (In Russian). English translation: Halsted; 1973.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Buyvol VN. Slender cavities in flows with perturbations. Кiev: Naukova Dumka; 1980 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Logvinovich GV, Buyvol VN, Dudko AS, et al. Free boundary flows. Кiev: Naukova Dumka; 1985 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Savchenko YuN. Supercavitating object propulsion. RTO-AVT/VKI Special Course on Supercavitating Flows; February 12–16, 2001. VKI, Brussels; 2001. (Belgium).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Savchenko YuN. On motion in water in supercavitation flow regimes. Gidromehanika. 1996;70:105–15 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Savchenko YuN, Vlasenko YuD, Semenenko VN. Experimental study of high-speed cavitated flows. Int J Fluid Mech Res. 1999;26(3):365–74.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Savchenko YuN, Semenenko VN, Putilin SI. Unsteady supercavitated motion of bodies. Int J Fluid Mech Res. 2000;27(1):109–37.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Savchenko YuN. Perspectives of the supercavitation flow applications. Proceedings of the International Conference on Superfast Marine Vehicles Moving Above, Under and in Water Surface (SuperFAST’2008), 2–4 July 2008. St. Petersburg; 2008. ISBN 5-88303-393-8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Savchenko YuN, Semenenko VN, Putilin SI, et al. Designing the high-speed supercavitating vehicles. International Conference on Fast Sea Transportation (FAST’2005), June 2005. St. Peterburg; 2005.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Semenenko VN. Some problems of supercavitating vehicle designing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Superfast Marine Vehicles Moving Above, Under and in Water Surface (SuperFAST’2008); 2–4 July 2008. St. Petersburg; 2008. ISBN 5-88303-393-8.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Logvinovich GV, Serebryakov VV. On the methods of calculating a shape of the slender axisymmetric cavities. Gidromehanika. 1975;32:47–54 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vlasenko YuD. Experimental investigations of supercavitating regime of flow around self-propelled models. Int J Fluid Mech Res. 2001;28(5):717–33.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Savchenko YuN, Semenenko VN. Special features of supercavitating flow around polygonal contours. Int J Fluid Mech Res. 2001;28(5):660–72.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Putilin SI. Some features of a supercavitating model dynamics. Int J Fluid Mech Res. 2001;28(5):631–43.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nesteruk I. Investigation of slender axisymmetric cavity form in fluid with gravity. Izv AN SSSR MFG. 1979;6:133–6 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nesteruk I. Form of slender axisymmetric cavity. Izv AN SSSR MFG. 1980;4:38–47 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nesteruk I. Some problems of axisymmetric cavity flows. Izv AN SSSR MFG. 1982;1:28–34 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nesteruk I. The slender axisymmetric cavity form calculations based on the integral-differential equation. Izv AN SSSR MFG. 1985;5:83–90 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goman OG, Semenov YA. Oblique entry of a wedge into an ideal incompressible fluid. Fluid Dynam. 2007;42(4):581–90.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Faltinsen OM, Semenov YA. The effect of gravity and cavitation on a hydrofoil near the free surface. J Fluid Mech. 2008;597:371–94.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Savchenko YuN, Semenov YA. Hydrodynamic drag of a surface with the mixed boundary conditions. Prykladna Gidromehanika. 2005;7(2):54–62 (In Russian).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Savchenko YuN, Savchenko GYu. Efficiency estimation of the supercavitation using on the axisymmetric hulls. Prykladna Gidromehanika. 2004;6(4):78–83 (In Russian).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Savchenko YuN, Savchenko GYu. Cylinder planning on the supercavity surface. Prykladna Gidromehanika. 2007;9(1):81–5 (In Russian).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Savchenko YuN, Savchenko GYu. Near-wall cavitation on a vertical wall. Prykladna Gidromehanika. 2006;8(4):53–9 (In Russian).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Nesteruk I. The problems of drag reduction in high speed hydrodynamics. The International Summer Scientific School “High Speed Hydrodynamics”; June 16–23, 2002. Cheboksary; 2002. p. 351–9.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nesteruk I. Drag reduction in high-speed hydrodynamics: supercavitation or unseparated shapes. CAV2006; 2006. Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nesteruk I. Drag calculation of slender cones using of the second approximation for created by them cavities. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2003;5(1):42–6 (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nesteruk I. Partial cavitation on long bodies. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2004;6(3):64–75 (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Garabedian PR. Calculation of axially symmetric cavities and jets. Pac J Math. 1956;6(4):611–84.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Nesteruk I. Simulation of axisymmetric and plane free surfaces by means of sources and doublets. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2003;5(2):37–44 (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Nesteruk I. Drag diminishing of long axisymmetric high-speed bodies. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2009;11(2):55–67 (In Ukrainian).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Manova ZI, Nesteruk I, Shepetyuk BD. Optimization problems for high-speed supercavitation motion on inertia with the non-slender cavitators. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2009;11(4):54–9 (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gieseke TJ. Toward an optimal weapon system utilizing supercavitating projectiles. International Conference on Cavitation “Cav2001”, Pasadena; 2001, Session B3.002.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Serebryakov VV. The models of the supercavitation prediction for high speed motion in water. International Summer Scientific School “High Speed Hydrodynamics”. Cheboksary; 2002:71–92.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Serebryakov VV, Kirshner IN, Scherr GH. Some problems of high speed motion in water with supercavitation for sub-, trans- and supersonic mach numbers. Proceedings of the X International scientific school “High-speed hydrodynamics” and International conference «Hydromechanics. Mechanics. Power-plants» (to the 145-th anniversary of academician A.N.Krylov). Moscow/Cheboksary: Cheboksary department of Moscow State Open University; 2008. p. 73–104. ISBN 978-5-902891-35-2.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nesteruk I, Semenenko VN. Problems of optimization of range of the supercavitation inertial motion at the fixed final depth. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2006;8(4):33–42 (In Ukrainian).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nesteruk I, Savchenko YuN, Semenenko VN. Range optimization for supercavitating motion on inertia. Rep Ukrainian Acad Sci. 2006;8:57–66 (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nesteruk I. Range maximization for supercavitation inertial motion with the fixed initial depth. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2008;10(3):51–64 (In Ukrainian).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Nesteruk I. Hull optimization for high-speed vehicles: supercavitating and unseparated shapes. International Conference SuperFAST2008, July 2–4, 2008. St. Petersburg; 2008.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Savchenko YuN. Investigations of supercavitation flows. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2007;9(2–3):150–8 (In Russian).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Buraga OA, Nesteruk I, Savchenko YuM. Comparison of the slender axisymmetric bodies drag by unseparated and supercavitation flow patterns. Prykladna Gidromekhanika (Appl Hydromech), Kyiv. 2002;4(2):3–8 (In Ukrainian).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lorant M. Investigation into High-Speed of Underwater Craft. Naut Mag. 1968;200(5):273–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Hydromechanics of National Academy of Sciences of UkraineKyivUkraine

Personalised recommendations