Advertisement

A Model for Interaction Design of Personalised Knowledge Systems in the Health Domain

  • Helena Lindgren
  • Peter Winnberg
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 69)

Abstract

This paper presents a terminology model of activity that integrates a common set of features to be used by domain experts in the modeling of knowledge in, and interaction with personalised knowledge systems in the medical and health domain. The model is developed based on theories and methods from multiple research domains in addition to empirical field studies of three application domains with end user prototype applications integrated. Features related to the user such as body functions, roles, motives, skills and preferences were included for personalisation purposes and protocols for designing interaction and reasoning. The model is integrated in a service-oriented architecture underlying Semantic Web applications and is extended with domain specific content in the application projects. Application examples are provided from the dementia domain and from monitoring health related issues in the mining and construction work environments.

Keywords

personalisation user model ontology knowledge modeling interaction design clinical decision-support systems argumentation AIF 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, D., Peleg, M., Tu, S., Boxwala, A., Greenes, R., Patel, V., Shortliffe, E.: Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: A literature review of guideline representation models. I. J. Med. Inform. 68(1-3), 59–70 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Seyfang, A., Miksch, S., Marcos, M., Wittenberg, J., Polo-Conde, C., Rosenbrand, K.: Bridging the Gap between Informal and Formal Guideline Representations. In: Brewka, G., Coradeschi, S., Perini, A., Traverso, P. (eds.) ECAI 2006. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 141, pp. 447–451. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lindgren, H., Eriksson, S.: Sociotechnical Integration of Decision Support in the Dementia Domain. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 157, 79–84 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lindgren, H.: Towards personalised decision support in the dementia domain based on clinical practice guidelines (to appear in UMUAI) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lindgren, H., Nilsson, I.: Designing Systems for Health Promotion and Autonomy in Older Adults. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 700–703. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B.: Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindgren, H.: Personalisation of Internet-Mediated Activity Support Systems in the Rehabilitation of Older Adults – A Pilot Study. In: Grasso, F., Paris, C. (eds.) Personalisation for e-Health, Verona, pp. 20–27 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bex, F., Prakken, H., Reed, C., Walton, D.: Towards a formal account of reasoning about evidence: argumentation schemes and generalisations. Artif. Intell. Law 11(2-3), 125–165 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chesnevar, C., McGinnis, J., Modgil, S., Rahwan, I., Reed, C., Simari, G., South, M., Vreeswijk, G., Willmott, S.: Towards an Argument Interchange Format. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21(4), 293–316 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tolchinsky, P., Modgil, S., Cortés, U.: Argument schemes and critical questions for heterogeneous agents to argue over the viability of a human organ. In: AAAI Spring Symposium Series; Argumentation for Consumers of Healthcare, pp. 377–384 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helena Lindgren
    • 1
  • Peter Winnberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computing ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations