Advertisement

Detecting Patient Motion in Projection Space for Cone-beam Computed Tomography

  • Wolfgang Wein
  • Alexander Ladikos
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6891)

Abstract

Cone-beam X-Ray systems strictly depend on the imaged object being stationary over the entire acquisition process. Even slight patient motion can affect the quality of the final 3D reconstruction. It would be desirable to be able to discover and model patient motion right from the actual projection images, in order to take it into account during reconstruction. However, while the source-detector arrangement is rotating around the patient, it is difficult to separate this motion from the additional patient motion. We present a novel similarity metric for successive X-Ray projections, which is able to distinguish between the expected rotational and additional sources of motion. We quantitatively evaluate it on simulated dental cone-beam X-Rays and qualitatively demonstrate its performance on real patient data.

Keywords

Projection Image Patient Motion Epipolar Line Frame Pair Angle Increment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ens, S., Ulrici, J., Hell, E., Buzug, T.: Automatic detection of patient motion in cone-beam computed tomography. In: 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 1257–1260 (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hansis, E., Schomberg, H., Erhard, K., Dössel, O., Grass, M.: Four-dimensional cardiac reconstruction from rotational x-ray sequences - first results for 4D coronary angiography. In: SPIE Medical Imaging 2009 Conference, vol. 7258 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hartley, R., Zisserman, A.: Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khamene, A., Bloch, P., Wein, W., Svatos, M., Sauer, F.: Automatic registration of portal images and volumetric CT for patient positioning in radiation therapy. Medical Image Analysis, 96–112 (February 2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rohkohl, C., Lauritsch, G., Biller, L., Hornegger, J.: ECG-gated interventional cardiac reconstruction for non-periodic motion. In: Jiang, T., Navab, N., Pluim, J.P.W., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2010. LNCS, vol. 6361, pp. 151–158. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schretter, C., Pilatus, F., Rose, G., Aach, T., Bertram, M.: Optical flow motion estimation for approximate motion compensation in cone-beam CT. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Meeting on Fully Three-Dimensional Image Reconstruction in Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, pp. 327–330 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wein, W., Brunke, S., Khamene, A., Callstrom, M., Navab, N.: Automatic CT-ultrasound registration for diagnostic imaging and image-guided intervention. Medical Image Analysis 12, 577–585 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Wein
    • 1
  • Alexander Ladikos
    • 1
  1. 1.White Lion Technologies AGMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations