Computations in Finite Groups and Quantum Physics

  • Vladimir V. Kornyak
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6885)


Mathematical core of quantum mechanics is the theory of unitary representations of symmetries of physical systems. We argue that quantum behavior is a natural result of extraction of “observable” information about systems containing “unobservable” elements in their descriptions. Since our aim is physics where the choice between finite and infinite descriptions can not have any empirical consequences, we consider the problem in the finite background. Besides, there are many indications from observations — from the lepton mixing data, for example — that finite groups underly phenomena in particle physics at the deep level. The “finite” approach allows to reduce any quantum dynamics to the simple permutation dynamics and, thus, to express quantum observables in terms of permutation invariants of symmetry groups and their integer characteristics such as sizes of conjugate classes, sizes of group orbits, class coefficients, and dimensions of representations. Our study has been accompanied by computations with finite groups, their representations and invariants. We have used both our C implementation of algorithms for working with groups and computer algebra system GAP.


Irreducible Representation Finite Group Conjugacy Class Invariant Subspace Permutation Representation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kornyak, V.V.: Quantization in discrete dynamical systems. J. Math. Sci. 168(3), 390–397 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kornyak, V.V.: Structural and symmetry analysis of discrete dynamical systems. In: Cellular Automata, pp. 1–45. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York (2010), Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hall Jr., M.: The Theory of Groups. Macmillan, New York (1959)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Kirillov, A.A.: Elements of the Theory of Representations. Springer, Heidelberg (1976)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakamura, K., et al.: (Particle Data Group): The review of particle physics. J. Phys. G 37, 075021, 1–1422 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smirnov, A.Y.: Discrete Symmetries and Models of Flavor Mixing, p. 14 (2011); arXiv:1103.3461Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Harrison, P.F., Perkins, D.H., Scott, W.G.: Tri-bimaximal mixing and the neutrino oscillation data. Phys. Lett. B 530, 167 (2002); arXiv: hep-ph/0202074CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Harrison, P.F., Scott, W.G.: Permutation symmetry, Tri-bimaximal neutrino mixing and the S3 group characters. Phys. Lett. B 557, 76 (2003); arXiv: hep-ph/0302025MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishimori, H., Kobayashi, T., Ohki, H., Okada, H., Shimizu, Y., Tanimoto, M.: Non-abelian discrete symmetries in particle physics. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 183, 1–173 (2010); arXiv:1003.3552Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ludl, P.O.: Systematic Analysis of Finite Family Symmetry Groups and Their Application to the Lepton Sector, arXiv:0907.5587Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blum, A., Hagedorn, C.: The Cabibbo Angle in a Supersymmetric D14 Model. Nucl. Phys. B 821, 327–353 (2009)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Altarelli, G., Feruglio, F.: Discrete flavor symmetries and models of neutrino mixing. Rev. Mod. Phys. 82(3), 2701–2729 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vladimir V. Kornyak
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Information TechnologiesJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchDubnaRussia

Personalised recommendations