Flow in Binary Media with Heterogeneous Air-Entry Pressure

Chapter
Part of the GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences book series (GEPS)

Abstract

In this chapter, the influence of heterogeneity in the air-entry pressure on the field-scale flow is examined. This issue is particularly important for media containing disconnected coarse-textured inclusions with low entry pressure embedded in a continuous fine-textured background with high entry pressure. During capillary-driven imbibition, the background material becomes water-saturated at a higher value of the capillary pressure than inclusions. The air phase loses its continuity and becomes trapped in inclusions. During drainage of fully water-saturated medium the inclusions can be drained only when the air entry pressure of the background material is exceeded. At the Darcy scale these two effects can be captured by the two-phase model, but not by the Richards equation, which does not account for air flow. However, at the field scale it is possible to represent these phenomena using either the two-phase formulation or the Richards model, on condition that the field-scale capillary and permeability functions are appropriately modified.

References

  1. 1.
    Braun C, Helmig R, Manthey S (2005) Macro-scale effective constitutive relationships for two phase flow processes in heterogeneous porous media with emphasis on the relative permeability-saturation relationship. J Contam Hydrol 76(1–2):47–85. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2004.07.009 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eichel H, Helmig R, Neuweiler I, Cirpka O (2005) Upscaling of two-phase flow processes in porous media. In: Das D, Hassanizadeh S (ed) Upscaling multiphase flow in porous media, Springer, New York, pp 237–257Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jonoud S, Jackson M (2008) New criteria for the validity of steady-state upscaling. Transp Porous Media 71(1):53–73. doi:10.1007/s11242-007-9111-x Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mikelic A, van Duijn C, Pop I (2002) Effective equations for two-phase flow with trapping on the micro scale. SIAM J Appl Math 62(5):1531–1568. doi:10.1137/S0036139901385564 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Quintard M, Whitaker S (1988) Two-phase flow in heterogeneous porous media: The method of large scale averaging. Transp Porous Media 3(4):357–413. doi:10.1007/BF00233177
  6. 6.
    Saez A, Otero C, Rusinek I (1989) The effective homogeneous behavior of heterogeneous porous media. Transp Porous Media 4(3):213–238. doi:10.1007/BF00138037
  7. 7.
    Stephen K, Pickup G, Sorbie K (2001) The local analysis of changing force balances in immiscible incompressible two-phase flow. Transp Porous Media 45(1):63–88. doi:10.1023/A:1011850618324 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szymkiewicz A, Helmig R, Kuhnke H (2011) Two-phase flow in heterogeneous porous media with non-wetting phase trapping. Transp Porous Media 86(1):27–47. doi:10.1007/s11242-010-9604-x
  9. 9.
    Szymkiewicz A, Helmig R, Neuweiler I (2012) Upscaling unsaturated flow in binary porous media with air entry pressure effects. Water Resour Res 48:W04522. doi:10.1029/2011WR010893
  10. 10.
    van Duijn C, Eichel H, Helmig R, Pop I (2007) Effective equations for two-phase flow in porous media: the effect of trapping at the micro-scale. Transp Porous Media 69(3):411–428. doi:10.1007/s11242-006-9089-9
  11. 11.
    Vasin M, Lehmann P, Kaestner A, Hassanein R, Nowak W, Helmig R, Neuweiler I (2008) Drainage in heterogeneous sand columns with different geometric structures. Adv Water Resour 31(9):1205–1220. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2008.01.004 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGdansk University of TechnologyGdanskPoland

Personalised recommendations