Challenges in Secure Sensor-Cloud Computing

  • Nayot Poolsappasit
  • Vimal Kumar
  • Sanjay Madria
  • Sriram Chellappan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6933)


Cloud computing is a concept that has received significant attention lately. With advances in virtualization, coupled with the demand for services, many initiatives are underway in the environment of cloud computing. At this point, most of the services in cloud Computing are broadly in the paradigm of computing and storage, and in the traditional Client Server mode. With the recent explosion of wireless sensor networks and their applicability in civilian and military applications, there is an emerging vision for integrating sensor networks into the cloud. Practical systems like Microsoft’s SensorMap and Asia Pacific Environmental Sensor Grid are attestations to the enormous potential for sensor networks to be integrated into the cloud. In this framework users need not own sensor networks. Sensor Network owners after a mission need not disband the networks. There is a symbiotic relationship wherein sensor network owners can provide a variety of services to customers for profit. Customers also benefit from a variety of remote services without being physically close to the environment of interest. However, despite the benefits of sensor-clouds, security issues are largely open. A variety of new threats and attacks are possible, and existing solutions in standalone sensor networks will not be applicable in the cloud. The vision of this article is to introduce the sensor-cloud computing and overview the research challenges from the security perspective.


Sensor Network Wireless Sensor Network Cloud Computing Cloud Service Physical Sensor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Beng, L.H.: Sensor cloud:towards sensor-enabled cloud services, intelligent systems center, nanyang technological university (April 13, 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Backhouse, J., Halperin, R.: Approaching interoperability for identity management systems. The Future of Identity in the Information Society, 245–268 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayardo, R., Agrawal, R.: Data privacy through optimal k-anonymization (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bhargav-Spantzel, A., Squicciarini, A., Bertino, E.: Trust negotiation in identity management. IEEE Security & Privacy 5(2), 55–63 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boneh, D., Waters, B.: Conjunctive, subset, and range queries on encrypted data. In: Vadhan, S.P. (ed.) TCC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4392, pp. 535–554. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boukerche, A., Li, X.: An agent-based trust and reputation management scheme for wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, GLOBECOM 2005, vol. 3, p. 5. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dantu, R., Loper, K., Kolan, P.: Risk management using behavior based attack graphs. In: Proceedings of International Conference on Information Technology: Coding and Computing, ITCC 2004, vol. 1, pp. 445–449. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dewri, R., Poolsappasit, N., Ray, I., Whitley, D.: Optimal security hardening using multi-objective optimization on attack tree models of networks. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 204–213. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Domingo-Ferrer, J., Torra, V.: Ordinal, continuous and heterogeneous k-anonymity through microaggregation. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 11(2), 195–212 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eschenauer, L., Gligor, V.D.: A key-management scheme for distributed sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, CCS (November 2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fung, B., Wang, K., Yu, P.: Top-down specialization for information and privacy preservation. In: 21st International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2005, pp. 205–216. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gu, W., Bai, X., Chellappan, S.: Scaling laws of key pre-distribution protocols in wireless sensor networks. Technical report, Technical Report, The Department of Computer Science, Missouri University of Science and Technology (2010),
  13. 13.
    Kapadia, A., Myers, S., Wang, X., Fox, G.: Secure cloud computing with brokered trusted sensor networks. In: International Symposium on Collaborative Technologies and Systems (CTS) 2010, pp. 581–592. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Katz, J., Sahai, A., Waters, B.: Predicate encryption supporting disjunctions, polynomial equations, and inner products. In: Smart, N.P. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 4965, pp. 146–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    LeFevre, K., DeWitt, D., Ramakrishnan, R.: Incognito: Efficient full-domain k-anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 49–60. ACM, New York (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    LeFevre, K., DeWitt, D., Ramakrishnan, R.: Mondrian multidimensional k-anonymity. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2006, p. 25. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, N., Li, T., Venkatasubramanian, S.: t-closeness: Privacy beyond k-anonymity and l-diversity. In: IEEE 23rd International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2007, pp. 106–115. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lim, H., Iqbal, M., Ng, T.: A virtualization framework for heterogeneous sensor network platforms. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 319–320. ACM, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Machanavajjhala, A., Kifer, D., Gehrke, J., Venkitasubramaniam, M.: l-diversity: Privacy beyond k-anonymity. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD) 1(1), 3 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mahalle, P., Babar, S., Prasad, N., Prasad, R.: Identity Management Framework towards Internet of Things (IoT): Roadmap and Key Challenges. Recent Trends in Network Security and Applications, 430–439 (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Messmer, E.: Cloud-based identity management gets a boost Network World (May 19, 2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nergiz, M., Clifton, C., Nergiz, A.: Multirelational k-anonymity. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 21(8), 1104–1117 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Probst, M., Kasera, S.: Statistical trust establishment in wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems 2007, vol. 2, pp. 1–8. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ray, I., Poolsappasit, N., Dewri, R.: An Opinion Model for Evaluating Malicious Activities in Pervasive Computing Systems. In: Atluri, V. (ed.) DAS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5094, pp. 297–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Recordon, D., Reed, D.: OpenID 2.0: a platform for user-centric identity management. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM Workshop on Digital Identity Management, pp. 11–16. ACM, New York (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sorniotti, A., Gomez, L., Wrona, K., Odorico, L.: Secure and Trusted in-network Data Processing in Wireless Sensor Networks: a Survey. Journal of Information Assurance and Security 2(3), 189–199 (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sweeney, L.: Achieving k-anonymity Privacy Protection using Generalization and Suppression. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 10(5), 571–588 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. URIs. Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) V2. 0 Technical Overview (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vilcinskas, M., Craw, L., Brekkan, B.: Understanding Forefront Identity Manager 2010 Microsoft Corporation (October 2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang, L., Noel, S., Jajodia, S.: Minimum-cost network hardening using attack graphs. Computer Communications 29(18), 3812–3824 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yuriyama, M., Kushida, T.: Sensor-cloud infrastructure-physical sensor management with virtualized sensors on cloud computing (2010)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang, W., Das, S., Liu, Y.: A trust based framework for secure data aggregation in wireless sensor networks. In: 3rd Annual IEEE Communications Society on Sensor and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2006, vol. 1, pp. 60–69. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nayot Poolsappasit
    • 1
  • Vimal Kumar
    • 1
  • Sanjay Madria
    • 1
  • Sriram Chellappan
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science DepartmentMissouri University of Science and TechnologyRollaUSA

Personalised recommendations