• Teodoro Martín Noguerol
  • Antonio Luna
  • Joan C. Vilanova
Part of the Learning Imaging book series (LEARN)


A 34-year-old woman had a history of repeated abortions. On transvaginal ultrasound, a double uterine cavity was identified. MR was performed for further assessment.


Endometrial Cancer Endometrial Carcinoma Uterine Artery Embolization Uterine Fibroid Myometrial Invasion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Further Reading


  1. Fleischer AC, Javitt MC, Jeffrey RB, Jones HW (1997) Clinical gynecologic imaging. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  2. Hamm B, Forstner R (2007) MRI and CT of the female pelvis. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Maulik D, Zalud I (2005) Doppler ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology, 2nd rev. and enl. ed. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  4. Rumack CM, Wilson S, Charboneau JW, Johnson JA (2005) Diagnostic ultrasound. Mosby, St LouisGoogle Scholar
  5. Semelka RC (2006) Abdominal-pelvic MRI, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss, New YorkGoogle Scholar


  1. Bell DJ, Pannu HK (2011) Radiological assessment of gynecologic malignancies. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 45(1), viiGoogle Scholar
  2. Bilhim T, Pisco JM, Duarte M, Oliveira AG (2011) Polyvinyl alcohol particle size for uterine artery embolization: a prospective randomized study of initial use of 350–500 μm particles versus initial use of 500–700 μm particles. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22(1):21–27PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao K, Gao M, Sun YS, Li YL, Sun Y, Gao YN, et al (2011) Apparent diffusion coefficient of diffusion weighted MRI in endometrial carcinoma-Relationship with local invasiveness. Eur J Radiol May 16 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  4. Chassang M, Novellas S, Baudin G, Delotte J, Mialon O, Bongain A et al (2011) Contribution of new MRI sequences in the exploration of the pelvic gynaecological disease. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 40(5):399–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Emoto M, Sadamori R, Hachisuga T, Kawarabayashi T, Miyamoto S (2011) Clinical usefulness of contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography in invasive and noninvasive gestational trophoblastic diseases: a preliminary study. J Reprod Med 56(5–6):224–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Fan TY, Zhang L, Chen W, Liu Y, He M, Huang X, et al (2011) Feasibility of MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound treatment for adenomyosis. Eur J Radiol Jun 28 [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  7. Fennessy FM, Kong CY, Tempany CM, Swan JS (2011) Quality-of-life assessment of fibroid treatment options and outcomes. Radiology 259(3):785–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Genever AV, Abdi S (2011) Can MRI predict the diagnosis of endometrial carcinosarcoma? Clin Radiol 66(7):621–624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hecht EM, Do RK, Kang SK, Bennett GL, Babb JS, Clark TW (2011) Diffusion-weighted imaging for prediction of volumetric response of leiomyomas following uterine artery embolization: a preliminary study. J Magn Reson Imaging 33(3):641–646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kamimori T, Sakamoto K, Fujiwara K, Umayahara K, Sugiyama Y, Utsugi K, Takeshima N, Tanaka H, Gomi N, Takizawa K (2011) Parametrial involvement in FIGO stage IB1 cervical carcinoma diagnostic impact of tumor diameter in preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Gynecol Cancer 21(2):349–354PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kido A, Ascher SM, Kishimoto K, Hahn W, Jha RC, Togashi K et al (2011) Comparison of uterine peristalsis before and after uterine artery embolization at 3-T MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(6):1431–1435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim HS, Baik JH, Pham LD, Jacobs MA (2011a) MR-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for symptomatic uterine leiomyomata long-term outcomes. Acad Radiol 18(8):970–976PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim YS, Lim HK, Kim JH, Rhim H, Park BK, Keserci B, et al (2011) Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging predicts immediate therapeutic response of magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Invest Radiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  14. Lee EJ, Kim SH, Kim YH (2011) Uterine cavernous haemangioma in a post-menopausal woman: CT and MRI findings mimicking uterine myoma with degeneration. Br J Radiol 84(1000):e68–e71PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Levy A, Medjhoul A, Caramella C, Zareski E, Berges O, Chargari C et al (2011) Interest of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping in gynecological malignancies: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging 33(5):1020–1027PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marcal L, Nothaft MA, Coelho F, Volpato R, Iyer R (2011) Mullerian duct anomalies: MR imaging. Abdom Imaging [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  17. Mori K, Saida T, Shibuya Y, Takahashi N, Shiigai M, Osada K, et al (2011) Unenhanced MR angiography of uterine and ovarian arteries after uterine artery embolization: differences between patients with incomplete and complete fibroid infarction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  18. Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, Toullalan O, Chevallier A, Bouaziz J et al (2011) MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196(5):1206–1213PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruuskanen AJ, Hippeläinen MI, Sipola P, Manninen HI (2011) Association between magnetic resonance imaging findings of uterine leiomyomas and symptoms demanding treatment. Eur J Radiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  20. Smeets AJ, Nijenhuis RJ, Boekkooi PF, Vervest HA, van Rooij WJ, Lohle PN (2011) Long-term follow-up of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  21. Takatsu A, Shiozawa T, Miyamoto T, Kurosawa K, Kashima H, Yamada T, et al (2011) Preoperative differential diagnosis of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma and lobular endocervical glandular hyperplasia of the uterine cervix: a multicenter study of clinicopathology and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Int J Gynecol Cancer [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  22. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K (2011) Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problem-solving MR imaging techniques. Radiographics 31(1):99–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vargas HA, Akin O, Zheng J, Moskowitz C, Soslow R, Abu-Rustum N et al (2011) The value of MR imaging when the site of uterine cancer origin is uncertain. Radiology 258(3):785–792PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vivier PH, Liard A, Beurdeley M, Brasseur-Daudruy M, Cellier C, Le Dosseur P, et al (2011) Uterus didelphys, hemihydrocolpos and empty ipsilateral lumbar fossa in a newborn girl: involuted dysplastic kidney rather than renal agenesis. Pediatr Radiol [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  25. Yazdi AT, De Smet K, Ernst C, Desprechins B, de Mey J (2011) Uterus didelphys with obstructed hemivagina and renal agenesis: MRI findings. JBR-BTR 94(1):16–18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teodoro Martín Noguerol
    • 1
  • Antonio Luna
    • 1
  • Joan C. Vilanova
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinica Las Nieves, SercosaJaénSpain
  2. 2.Department of RadiologyClínica Girona-Hospital Sta. CaterinaGironaSpain

Personalised recommendations