Integration of Behaviour-Based Computational and Physical Models Design Computation and Materialisation of Morphologically Complex Tension-Active Systems
The use of Particle Systems to replicate physical form-finding methods has been well documented; initiated, arguably, with Axel Kilian’s CADenary software mimicking Gaudi’s hanging-chain methods. The evolution of these algorithms for simulating fundamental physics has seen models formed via forces such as gravity, tension, compression, magnetism, and pressure. The approach seeks geometry organization, not through discreet rules, but through emergent behaviour of interacting forces forming an equilibrium state. The value, though often unseen, is that these resulting models hold information, not only of geometric description, but of dynamic force-active properties, critical for materialisation as well as the understanding and design of the entirety of the interrelation system. This paper shall focus on the development of a Particle System based computational methodology which integrates various critical aspects of force, materiality, and form in the generation of morphologically complex tension-active systems.
KeywordsParticle System Force Diagram Force Behaviour Interrelation System Generative Modelling Environment
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ahlquist, S., Fleischmann, M.: Cylindrical Mesh Morphologies: Study of computational meshes based on parameters of force, material, and space for the design of tension-active structures. In: 27th eCAADe Conference Proceedings of Computation: The New Realm of Architectural Design , Istanbul (2009)Google Scholar
- Ahlquist, S., Menges, A.: Realizing Formal and Functional Complexity for Structurally Dynamic Systems in Rapid Computational Means: Computational Methodology based on Particle Systems for Complex Tension-Active Form Generation. In: Ceccato, C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Advances in Architectural Geometry Conference 2010. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
- Fleischmann, M., Ahlquist, S., Menges, A.: Articulating Boundaries of Computational Meshes. In: Proceedings of the Design Modelling Symposium, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
- Goel, A., Rugaber, S., Vattam, S.: Structure, Behavior and Function of Complex Systems: The SBF Modeling Language. Georgia Institute of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
- Gordon, J.E.: The New Science of Strong Materials or Why You Don’t Fall through the Floor, Revised edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2006)Google Scholar
- Kilian, A.: Linking hanging chain models and fabrication. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Association of Computer Aided Design in Architecture and the 2004 Conference of the AIA Technology in Architectural Proactice Knowledge Community, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
- Kilian, A., Ochsendorf, J.: Particle-Spring Systems for Structural Form Finding. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures (2005)Google Scholar
- Knippers, J., et al.: Plastics and Membranes Construction Manual: Materials and Semi-Finished Products, Form Finding and Construction. Birkhäuser Architektur (2010)Google Scholar
- Linhard, J.: Numerisch-mechanische Betrachtung des Entwurfsprozesses von Membrantragwerken. Dissertation, Technischen UniversitätMünchen (2009)Google Scholar
- Moncrieff, E.: Systems for Lightweight Structure Design: the State-of-the-Art and Current Developments. In: Onate, E., Kroeplin, B. (eds.) Textile Composites and Inflatable Structures. Springer, Netherlands (2005)Google Scholar