Adsorption Behavior of Cedrus Deodara Leaves for Copper (II) from Synthetically Prepared Waste Water

  • N. C. Joshi
  • N. S. Bhandari
  • S. Kumar

Abstract

The present work deals with the treatment of copper (II) containing waste water using low cost adsorbent. The readily available waste leaves i. e. Cedrus deodara have been used for removal of copper (II) from synthetic waste water. The adsorption study was carried out by batch operation including contact time, dosage, pH, concentration and temperature. The maximum removal achieved at optimized conditions such as high dose of adsorbent, high pH and low concentration of metal ions. The pH is an extremely important factor than other parameters have been used for removal of metal ion by Deodar leaf powder; 75.42 percent copper (II) has removed after 25 minutes at pH 5. The equilibrium data of adsorption have also been tested with various isotherm models.

Keywords

Heavy Metal Removal Efficiency Isotherm Model Copper Sulfate Batch Operation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    M. Havelcova, J. Mizera, I.S. korova, M. Pekar; J. of Hazardous Mater. 161(2009) 559–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Babel, T.A. Kurniawan; J. Hazard. Mater. B 97 (2003)219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M.D. Mashitah, Z. Zulfadhly, S. Bhatia, J. Artif; Cells, Blood Subst. Immobil. Biotechnol. 27(1999) 429–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A.Y. Dursun; Biochem. Eng. J. 28(2006) 187–195 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.L. Liu, B.Y. Chen, Y.W. Lan, Y.C. Cheng; Chem. Eng. J. 97 (2004)195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    O.I. Oboh and E.O. Aluyor; African J. of Biotech. 7(2008) 4508.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Ajmal, A.K. Rifaqat, Rao, J. Ahmed, S. Anwar and R. Ahmad; J. Environ. Sci. and Engg. 50(2008)7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    M. Alam, M.A. and S. Rais; Rasayan Journal chem. 2(2009) 791–806.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Sari, D. Mendil, M. Tuzen and M. Soylak, J. Hazard. Mater.162(2009) 874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.L. Gardea-Torresday, G dela Rosa and J.R. Peralta Videa, Pure App. Chemistry 76 (2004)801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Riaz, R. Nadeem, M.A. Hanif,T. M. Ansari, K.U.Rehman;J. of Hazardous Mater.161(2009) 88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Edwin Vasu; E. Journal of chemistry 5(2008) 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    I.Langmuir; J. Am. Chem. Soc. 40(1918) 1361–1403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.W. Adamson; Physical chemistry of surfaces, 5th edition, John willey and sons Inc., New York (1990).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    G. Karthikeyan and S. Siva Ilango; E. Journal of chemistry 5 (2008)666–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    A.E. Nemr; J. Hazard. Mater. 161(2009) 132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. C. Joshi
    • 1
  • N. S. Bhandari
    • 1
  • S. Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ChemistryKumaun UniversityAlmoraIndia
  2. 2.Vivekananda Institute of Hill AgricultureAlmoraIndia

Personalised recommendations