Skip to main content
  • 2058 Accesses

Abstract

The QSAR models were developed using multiple linear regression (MLR) and partial least square (PLS) for 2, 4-diamino-8-deazafolate analogues generated comparable models with good predictive ability and all other statistical values, r, r2, r2 cv, r2 (test set) F and s values were 0.94, 0.88, 0.86, 0.84, 58.70 and 0.13 respectively for MLR and r2 cv, r2 (test set) and statistical significance values were 0.87, 0.84 and 0.99 respectively for PLS, were satisfactory. The analysis indicate the role of first atom E-state, number of H-bond doners and VAMP mean polarizability in determining the activity of 2, 4-diamino-8-deazafolate analogues as potent antitoxoplasmal agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M.E. Grigg and Y. Suzuki; 5 (2003) 685.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Warren, S. George and J. You; Pharmacotherapy. 17 (1997) 900.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. R. Behbahani, M. Moshfeghi and J.D. Baxter; Ann. Pharmacother. 29 (1995)760.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. J.A. Kovacs, J.W. Hiemenz and A.M. Macher; Ann. Intern. Med. 100 (1984) 663.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. C.J. Allegra, J.A. Kovacs and J.C. Drake; J. Clin. Invest. 79 (1987) 478.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. J.A. Kovacs, C.J. Allegra and J.C. Swan; Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J.A. Kovacs, C.J. Allegra, J. Beaver, and D. Boarman; J. Infect. Dis. 160 (1989) 312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Gangjee, Y. Zhu, S.F. Queener and P. Francom; J. Med. Chem. 39 (1996) 1836.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Paliwal, A. Narayan and S. Paliwal; QSAR Comb Sci. 28 (2009) 1367.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S.K. Paliwal, M. Pal and A.A. Siddiqui; Med. Chem. Res 19 (2010) 475.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Golbraikh and M. Shen, Z. Xiao; Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design. 17 (2003) 241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Yu, R. Su, L. Wang; Med. Chem. Res. (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.Y. Prasad, R.P. Kumar and J.D. Smiles; Arkivoc. 11 (2008) 266.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R.D. Cramer; Drug Discov Des. 1 (1993) 269.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

L. D. Khemani M. M. Srivastava Shalini Srivastava

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mishra, R., Agarwal, A., Paliwal, S. (2012). QSAR Analysis of Anti-Toxoplasma Agents. In: Khemani, L., Srivastava, M., Srivastava, S. (eds) Chemistry of Phytopotentials: Health, Energy and Environmental Perspectives. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23394-4_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics