Advertisement

A Robot for Surgery: Design, Control and Testing

  • Basem Fayez Yousef
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 26)

Abstract

In this chapter, the design and control of a robotic arm for medical applications will be explained in detail. A general purpose gross positioning robot arm for use in robot-assisted medical applications is introduced. The actuated macro manipulator can carry, appropriately orient, precisely position and firmly “lock” in place different types of micro robots and surgical tools necessary for applications in minimally invasive therapy. With a simple manipulation protocol, the clinician can easily operate the robot in manual mode. Also a remote control mode can be enabled for teleoperation of the robot, and a quick homing routine ensures its re-calibration. Robot workspace analysis is investigated by two methods to study the robot’s singularity regions where a 3D visualization technique is used to visualize the location of the singularity trajectories.

Performance analysis techniques using CAD software were used to quantify displacement and angular errors. It will be shown how the sophisticated configuration and joint architecture of the arm enable it to perform and interact efficiently with the constrained and limited workspace of surgical environments. The special features of the proposed robot make it well suited for use with new surgical tools and micro robots for a range of medical interventions.

Keywords

Revolute Joint Angular Error Surgical Tool Joint Velocity Prostate Brachytherapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cleary, K., Nguyen, C.: State of the art surgical robotics: Clinical applications and technology challenges. Computer Aided Surgery 6(6), 312–328 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stoianovici, D., Webster, R., Kavoussi, L.: Robotic Tools for Minimally Invasive Urologic Surgery. In: Complications of Urologic Laparoscopic Surgery: Recognition, Management and Prevention (2002), http://pegasus.me.jhu.edu/~rwebster/index_files/pub_files/chapter.pdf
  3. 3.
    Yousef, B.: Design of a Robot Manipulator and an Ultrasound Probe Holder for Medical Applications. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bassan, H.: Design, Construction and Control of a Micro Manipulator for Prostate Brachytherapy. Dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yousef, B., Patel, R.V., Moallem, M.: Macro-Robot Manipulator for Medical Applications. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, pp. 530–535 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davies, B., Hilbert, R., Timoney, A., Wickham, J.: A surgeon Robot for Prostatectomies. In: Proc. of 2nd Workshop on Medical and Healthcare Robots, Newcastle, pp. 91–101 (1989)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marescaux, J., Leroy, J., Rubino, F., Smith, M., Vix, M., Simone, M., Mutter, D.: Transatlantic Robot-Assisted Telesurgery. Nature 413, 379–380 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guthart, G., Salisbury, J.: The intuitive telesurgery system: Overview and application. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2000), San Francisco, CA, pp. 618–621 (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eto, M., Naito, S.: Endouronocology. In: Robotic Surgery Assisted by the ZEUS System, pp. 39–48. Springer, Tokyo (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Advincula, A.P., Song, A.: The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 19(4), 331–336 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lerner, A.G., Stoianovici, D., Whitcomb, L.L., Kavoussi, L.R.: A passive positioning and supporting device for surgical robots and instrumentation. In: Taylor, C., Colchester, A. (eds.) MICCAI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1679, pp. 1052–1061. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Phee, L., Di, X., Yuen, J., Chan, C.F., Ho, H., Thng, C.H., Cheng, C., Ng, W.: Ultrasound guided robotic system for transperineal biopsy of the prostate. IEEE Trans. on Robotics and Automation 18, 1315–1320 (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bassan, H., Patel, R.V., Moallem, M.: A Novel Manipulator for 3D Ultrasound Guided Percutaneous Needle Insertion. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2007), pp. 617–622 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Craig, J.J.: Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control, 3rd edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gosselin, C., Angeles, J.: A Global Performance Index for the Kinematic Optimization of Robot Manipulators. ASME Trans. Journal of Mechanical Design 113, 220–226 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yousef, B., Patel, R.V., Moallem, M.: An Ultrasound Probe Holder for Image-Guided Surgery. ASME Journal of Medical Devices 2(2), 021002-8 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basem Fayez Yousef
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUnited Arab Emirates UniversityAl-AinUnited Arab Emirates

Personalised recommendations