Degradation Mechanism of Creep Strength Enhanced Ferritic Steels for Power Plants

  • K. Sawada
  • M. Tabuchi
  • K. Kimura


Creep strength degradation of Creep Strength Enhanced Ferritic (CSEF) steels was investigated, focusing on microstructural degradation. The creep strength of ASME Gr.91 steel remarkably decreased in the long-term at 600oC and 650oC. If the data in the long-term are selected for regression analysis, we can accurately evaluate long-term creep strength. The data under applied stresses larger than proportional limit stress should be omitted for the analysis. Creep deformation under a stress lower than proportional limit stress is strongly affected by microstructural changes due to diffusion. After long-term creep exposure at 600oC, the martensitic lath structure was collapsed by recovery and coarsening of precipitates occurred. The recovery of lath structure preferentially occurred around prior austenite grain boundaries. The Z-phase particles nucleated around prior austenite grain boundaries during creep exposure, consuming fine MX particles that were main strengthener.


Prior Austenite Creep Strength Proportional Limit Creep Life Lath Structure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Masuyama F. History of Power Plants and Progress in Heat Resistant Steels. ISIJ Int., 41, 612–625 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Onizawa T, Wakai T, Ando M and Aoto K: Proc. Creep and Fracture in High Temperature Components—Design and Life Assessment Issues, ed. by I. A. Shibli et al., DEStech Publications, Inc., Lancaster, USA, (2005), 130.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tanigawa H et al. Technical issues of reduced activation ferritic/martensitic steels for fabrication of ITER test blanket modules. Fusion Engineering and Design 83, 1471–1476 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kimura K. Assessment of long-term creep strength and review of allowable stress of high Cr ferritic creep resistant steels. Proc. PVP2005, 2005 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, Denver, Colorado USA; July 17–21 2005.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kimura K. Creep strength assessment and review of allowable tensile stress of creep strength enhanced ferritic steels in Japan. Proc. PVP2006/ICPVT- 11, 2006 ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Division Conference, Vancouver, BC, Canada; July23-27 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kushima H, Kimura K, Abe F. Degradation of Mod.9Cr 1Mo Steel during long-term creep deformation. Tetsu-to-Hagane 85, 841–847 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maruyama K, Sawada K and Koike J. Strengthening mechanisms of creep resistant tempered martensitic steel. ISIJ Int., 41 641653 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hald J. Metallography and alloy design in the COST 536 action. In: Lecomte- Beckers J, et al, editor. 8th Liege Conf. on Materials for Advanced Power Engineering. ulich:Forschungszentrum, Julich GmbH; 2006.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sawada K, Kushima H, Kimura K, Tabuchi M. TTP diagrams of Z phase in 9-12%Cr heat resistant steels. ISIJ Int 47, 733–739 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cipolla L, Danielsen H.K, Venditti D, Nunzio P.E.Di, Hald J and Somers M.A.J. Conversion of MX nitrides to Z-phase in a martensitic 12% Cr steel. Acta Mater., 58, 669–679 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sawada
    • 1
  • M. Tabuchi
    • 1
  • K. Kimura
    • 1
  1. 1.National Institute for Materials ScienceTsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations