Mini-samples technique in tensile and fracture toughness tests of nano-structured materials

  • Tomasz Brynk
  • Rafal M. Molak
  • Zbigniew Pakiela
  • Krzysztof J. Kurzydlowski


Samples dimensions defined in standards for tensile and fracture toughness tests may be too large in the case of modern materials produced in small volumes, e.g. nano-structured metals. Also, dimensions of irradiation tests samples are frequently not appropriate for standardized samples. In such situations so called mini-samples need to be used. The paper presents methodology and the results of tensile and fracture toughness tests which were carried out on mini-samples with a few millimeter dimensions. These samples were made of nano-structured metals processed by hydro extrusion (HE) and equal channel angular pressing (ECAP). Due to small size of specimens optical method of strain measurement - digital image correlation (DIC) - was applied. DIC twopoint- tracing mode was used as an optical extensometer in the tensile tests. The inverse method was applied for precise determining stress intensity factors and crack tip positions from displacement fields acquired by DIC. Comparison of the results of the tensile and fracture toughness tests which were carried out on standardized and mini-samples made of the same materials is also presented and the results are discussed in terms of the applicability of mini-samples technique in the studies of nano-metals.


Stress Intensity Factor Electric Discharge Machine Digital Image Correlation Equal Channel Angular Pressing Stress Intensity Factor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    1. Arzt E (1998) Size effects in materials due to microstructural and dimensional constraints: a comparative review, Acta Materialia 46:5611–5626Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM E399 standardGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brynk T, Rasinski M, Pakiela Z, Olejnik L, Kurzydlowski KJ (2010) Investigation of fatique crack growth rate of Al 5484 ultrafine grained alloy after ECAP process, Phys Status Solidi A 207:1132–1135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chu TC, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Peters WH (1985) Applications of Digital Image Correlation Techniques to Experimental Mechanics, Exp Mech 25:232–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Janssen PJM, de Keijser ThH, Geers MGD (2006) An experimental assessment of grain size effects in the uniaxial straining of thin Al sheet with a few grains across the thickness, Mater Sci and Eng A 419:238–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fleck NA, Muller GM, Ashby MF, Hutchinson JW (1994) Strain gradient plasticity: theory and experiment, Acta Metallica Materialia 42:475–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engel U, Eckstein R (2002) Microforming—from basic research to its realization, Journal of Mater Process Technol 125–126:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ma Q, Clarke DR (1995) Size dependence of the hardness of silver single crystals, Journal of Mater Res 10:853–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Norfleet DM, Dimiduk DM, Polasik SJ, Uchic MD, Mills MJ (2008) Dislocation structures and their relationship to strength in deformed nickel microcrystals, Acta Materialia 56:2988–3001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters WH, Ranson WF (1982) Digital imaging techniques on experimental stress analysis, Opt Eng 21:427–431Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peters WH, Ranson WF, Sutton MA, Chu TC, Anderson J (1993) Application of digital image correlation methods to rigid body mechanics, Opt Eng 22:738–742Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    PN-EN 10002–1 standardGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stölken JS, Evans AG (1998) A microbend test method for measuring the plasticity length scale, Acta Materialia 46: 5109–5115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    Yoneyama S, Morimoto Y, Takashi M (2006) Automatic Evaluation of Mixed-mode Stress Intensity Factors Utilizing Digital Image Correlation, Strain 42:21–29 234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tomasz Brynk
    • 1
  • Rafal M. Molak
    • 1
  • Zbigniew Pakiela
    • 1
  • Krzysztof J. Kurzydlowski
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Materials Science and EngineeringWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations