Advertisement

Gathering, Structuring and Modeling Business Process Knowledge of the Response to a Nuclear Crisis: Towards a Simulation Platform for Better Coordination

  • Aurélie Charles
  • Matthieu Lauras
  • Anne-Marie Barthe
  • Frédérick Bénaben
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 362)

Abstract

This paper illustrates how nuclear crisis are managed in France. It proposes IT solutions dedicated to event management that could help to resolve such a crisis by facilitating coordination between actors and increasing situational awareness. This study has been conducted as part of the European project PLAY. Requirements have been collected from different stakeholders through reviews of the literature, internal reports and websites, and interviews. Our proposal consists in the construction of a simulation tool to validate the complex-event processing architecture and the associated platform. The aim is to show the potential added value from the PLAY platform in the context of the response to a nuclear crisis.

Keywords

Complex-event processing distributed systems crisis management modeling collaboration 

References

  1. 1.
    Ané, C.: Tepco accumule les erreurs de communication. LeMonde.fr (2011), http://www.lemonde.fr/japon/article/2011/03/28/tepco-accumule-les-erreurs-de-communication_1499820_1492975.html
  2. 2.
    ASN. Les situations d’urgence - Autorité de sûreté nucléaire, http://www.asn.fr/index.php/S-informer/Dossiers/Les-situations-d-urgence
  3. 3.
    Belson, K.: Panic and Heroism Greeted Crisis at Japan Nuclear Plant. The New York Times (2011), http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/31/world/asia/31workers.html?_r=1&src=recg
  4. 4.
    IRSN. CODIR-PA Présentation de deux scénarios d’accident affectant une centrale nucléaire française (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    IRSN. IRSN - Expert in nuclear and radiological risk, http://www.irsn.fr/EN/Pages/home.aspx
  6. 6.
    Jurič, M.B., Mathew, B., Sarang, P.: Business Process Execution Language for Web Services. Packt Publishing Ltd. (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Konstantas, D., Bourrières, J.-P., Léonard, M.: Interoperability of enterprise software and applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mesmer, P.: Tepco, une entreprise trop sûre d’elle-même. LeMonde.fr (2011), http://www.lemonde.fr/japon/article/2011/03/16/tepco-une-entreprise-trop-sure-d-elle-meme_1493754_1492975.html
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Touzi, J., Benaben, F., Pingaud, H., Lorré, J.P.: A model-driven approach for collaborative service-oriented architecture design. International Journal of Production Economics 121(1), 5–20 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Trémeur, M., Lencznar, V.-A.: Communes et agglomérations face aux risques naturels et technologiques. du Papyrus (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    White, S.A., Miers, D.: BPMN Modeling and Reference Guide: Understanding and Using BPMN. Future Strategies Inc. (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shimbun, Y.: Firefighters struggle to find effective tactics. Daily Yomiuri Online (2011), http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110316004482.htm
  14. 14.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aurélie Charles
    • 1
  • Matthieu Lauras
    • 1
  • Anne-Marie Barthe
    • 1
  • Frédérick Bénaben
    • 1
  1. 1.Université de Toulouse, Mines AlbiAlbiFrance

Personalised recommendations