Contributions to the Theoretical Foundations of Integrated Modeling in Biogeochemistry and Their Application in Contaminated Areas

  • V. Iordache
  • R. Lăcătuşu
  • D. Scrădeanu
  • M. Onete
  • S. Ion
  • I. Cobzaru
  • A. Neagoe
  • F. Bodescu
  • D. Jianu
  • D. Purice
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Soil Biology book series (SOILBIOL, volume 31)

Abstract

We performed a rational reconstruction of the relationship between biogeochemistry and the study of ecological productive systems. A structural and a functional possibility for building biogeochemical integrated models with optimal complexity have been identified. The conceptual framework was then applied to metals in contaminated areas. Metal mobility results from the interaction (coupling) of environmental entities at a multitude of scales. We classified for the managerial interest the processes involved in metal mobility by their range of scales in “site” specific and “region” specific, and then detailed the processes involving theoretical entities specific to soil science, hydrology, and ecophysiology. In the end, we pointed out some consequences of the coupling between processes of different scales for the risk assessment of contaminated sites.

Keywords

Soil Column Coupling Mechanism Clonal Plant Environmental Object Metal Mobility 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was done in the Romanian Consortium for the Biogeochemistry of Trace Elements with financing from National University Research Council (CNCSIS) by project 291/2007 MECOTER, from National Center for the Management of Projects (CNMP) by projects 31012/2007 FITORISC, 31043/2007 PECOTOX, 52175/2008 METAGRO, and in the international consortium of the project UMBRELLA, FP7-ENV-2008-1 no. 226870. Special thanks go to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticism which improved the quality of the manuscript.

References

  1. Alexander RB, Boyer EW, Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Moore RB (2007) The role of headwater streams in downstream water quality. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argent RMA, Voinov A, Maxwell T, Cuddy SM, Rahman JM, Seaton S, Vertessy RA, Braddock RD (2006) Comparing modeling frameworks: a workshop approach. Environ Model Softw 21:895–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bambic DG, Alpers CN, Green PG, Fanelli E, Silk WK (2006) Seasonal and spatial patterns of metals at a restored copper mine site I. Stream copper and zinc. Environ Pollut 114:774–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Band LE, Tague CL, Brun SE, Tenenbaum DE, Fernandes RA (2000) Modeling watershed as spatial object hierarchies: structure and dynamics. Transact GIS 4:181–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beven K (2006) Searching for the Holy Grail of scientific hydrology. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:609–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bian L (2007) Object-oriented representation of environmental phenomena: is everything best represented as an object? Ann Assoc Am Geograph 97:267–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird G, Brewer PA, Macklin MG (2010) Management of the Danube drainage basin: implications of contaminant-metal dispersal for the implications of the EU Water Framework Directive. Int J River Basin Manag 8:63–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birkhead TR, Eden SF, Clarkson K, Goodburn S, Pellat J (1986) Social organisation of a population of magpies Pica pica. Ardea 74:59–68Google Scholar
  9. Bloeschl G (2001) Scaling in hydrology. Hydrol Process 15:709–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bloeschl G (2006) Hydrological syntheses – across processes, places and scales. Water Resour Res 42:W03S02CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bloeschl G, Sivapalan M (1995) Scale issues in hydrological modeling – review. Hydrol Process 9:251–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Branger F, Braud I, Debionne S, Viallet P, Dehotin J, Henine H, Nedelec Y, Anquetin S (2010) Towards multi-scale integrated hydrological models using the LIQUID framework: overview of concepts and first application examples. Environ Model Softw 25:1672–1681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Breure AM, Groot M, Eijsackers HJP (2008) System oriented ecotoxicological research: which way to go? Sci Total Environ 406:530–536PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Broxton PD, Troch PA, Lyon SW (2009) On the role of aspect to quantify water transit times in small mountainous catchments. Water Resour Res 45:W08427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burton NHK (2007) Influences of restock age and habitat patchiness on Tree Pipits Anthus trivialis breeding in Breckland pine plantations. Ibis 149S2:193–204Google Scholar
  16. Buytaert W, Reusser D, Krause S, Renaud J-P (2008) Why can’t we do better than Topmodel. Hydrol Process 22:4175–4179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Canullo R, Falinska K (2003) Ecologia vegetale. La struttura gerarchica della vegetatione, Liguori Editore Napoli ItaliaGoogle Scholar
  18. Caruso BS, Haynes J (2010) Connectivity and jurisdictional issues for rocky mountains and great plains aquatic resources. Wetlands, doi: 10.1007/s13157-010-0084-0
  19. Chadwick DB, Zirino A, Rivera-Duarte I, Katz CN, Blake AC (2004) Modeling the mass balance and fate of copper in San Diego Bay. Limnol Oceanogr 49:255–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chapin TP, Nimick DA, Gammous CH, Wanty RB (2007) Diel cycling on zinc in a stream impacted by acid rock drainage: initial results from a new in situ Zn analyzer. Environ Monit Assess 133:161–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Charpentier A, Stuefer JF (1999) Functional specialization of ramets in Scirpus maritimus – splitting the tasks of sexual reproduction, vegetative growth, and resource storage. Plant Ecol 141:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Christensen TH, Kjeldsen P, Bjerg PL, Jensen DL, Christensen JB, Baun A, Albrechtsen HJ, Heron G (2001) Biogoechemistry of landfill leachate plumes. Appl Geochem 16:659–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cormont A, Baveco JM, van den Brink NV, 2005, Effects of spatial foraging behaviour on risks of contaminants for wildlife. Alterra-rapport 1369, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  24. Cova JT, Goodchild FM (2002) Extending geographical representation to include fields of spatial objects, Int. j. geographical information science, 16:509–532Google Scholar
  25. Driscoll CT, Otton JK, Iverfeld A (1994) Trace metals speciation and cycling. In: Moldan B, Cerny J (eds) Biogeochemistry of small catchments: a tool for environmental research, vol 51. SCOPE, Wiley, New York, pp 301–322Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2005) Soil Atlas of Europe, European Soil Bureau Network Office for Official Publications of the Eur Communities, p 128Google Scholar
  27. Falińska K (1998) The framework for plant population biology. In: Falińska K (ed) Plant population biology and vegetation processes. W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Science, Krakow, pp 10–42Google Scholar
  28. Freeman MC, Pringle CM, Jackson CR (2007) Hydrologic connectivity and the contribution of stream headwaters to ecological integrity at regional scales. J Am Water Resour Assoc 43:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fritz BG, Arntzen EV (2007) Effect of rapidly changing river stage on uranium flux through the hyporheic zone. Ground Water 45:753–760PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fryar AE, Wallin EJ, Brown DL (2000) Spatial and temporal variability in seepage between a contaminated aquifer and tributaries to the Ohio River, Groundwater Monitoring and REmediation, 20:129–146Google Scholar
  31. Galan E, Fernández-Caliani JC, Gonzalez I, Aparicio P, Romero A (2008) Influence of geological setting on geochemical baselines of trace elements in soils: application to soils of South–West Spain. J Geochem Explor 98:89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Galuszka A (2007) A review of geochemical background concepts and an example using data from Poland. Environ Geol 52:861–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gammons CH, Nimick DA, Parker SR, Cleasby TE, McCleskey RB (2005) Diel behavior of iron and other heavy metals in a mountain stream with acidic to neural pH: Fisher Creek, Montana, USA. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 69:2505–2516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Golawski A, Dombrowski A (2002) Habitat use of Yellowhammers Emberiza citrinella, Ortolan Buntings E. hortulana, and Corn Buntings Miliaria calandra in farmland of east-central Poland. Ornis Fennica 79Google Scholar
  35. Golawski A, Golawska S (2008) Habitat preference in territories of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio and their food richness in an extensive agriculture landscape. Acta Zool Acad Sci Hung 54:89–97Google Scholar
  36. Haila Y, Hanuski IH, Raivio S (1989) Methodology for studying the minimum habitat requierments of forest birds. Ann Zool Fenn 26:173–180Google Scholar
  37. Harper JL (1977) Population biology of plants. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Hwang T, Band L, Hales TC (2009) Ecosystem processes at the watershed scale: extending optimality theory from plot to catchement. Water Resour Res 45:W11425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Iordache V (2010) The reconstruction of productive objects in Darwin’s “Origin of species”. In: Flonta M, Staicu L, Iordache V (eds) “Darwin, the evolution of species and evolutionary thinking” (in Romanian). Pelican, Giurgiu, Romania, pp 75–108Google Scholar
  40. Iordache V, Ion S, Pohoaţă A (2009) Integrated modeling of metals biogeochemistry: potential and limits. Chem Erde Geochem 69:125–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Iordache V, Kothe E, Neagoe A, Gherghel F (2011) A conceptual framework for up-scaling ecological processes and application to ectomycorrhizal fungi. In: Rai M, Varma A (eds) Diversity and biotechnology of ectomycorrhiza. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  42. Iordache V, Onete M, Paucă M, Oromulu L, Honciuc V, Purice D, Cobzaru I, Gomoiu I, Neagoe A (2010) Biological communities in mining areas: scale dependent patterns, organisms’ potential as bioindicators, and native plants for remediation. In: Proceedings 7th European Conference on Ecological Restoration, Avignon, France, 23-27/08/2010Google Scholar
  43. Jianu D, Iordache V, Soare B, Petrescu L, Neagoe A (2012) The role of mineralogy in the hazard potential of abandoned mine sites. In: Kothe E, Varma A (eds) Bio-geo-interactions in contaminated soils, Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  44. Joyce KA, Holland JM, Doncaster CP (1999) Influences of hedgerow intersections and gaps on the movement of carabid beetles. Bull Entomol Res 89:523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kavetski D, Klark MP (2011) Numerical troubles in conceptual hydrology: approximations, absurdities, and impact on hypothesis testing. Hydrol Process 25:661–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. vad der Keur P, Iversen BV (2006) Uncertainty in soil physical data at river basin scale. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 3:1281–1313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Khokhlova TY (2009) Juvenile moult and spatial behaviour of first-year Blackbirds Turdus merula on the northeast edge of the range. Avian Ecol Behav 15:1–22Google Scholar
  48. Kohne JM, Kohne S, Simunek J (2009) A review of model applications for structured soils: a water flow and tracer transport. J Contaminant Hydrol 104:4–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kothe E (2009) Using microbes for the regulation of heavy metals mobility at ecosystem and landscape scale. Research project. http://www.umbrella.uni-jena.de
  50. Kraft P, Multsch S, Vache KB, Frede H-G, Breuer L (2010) Using phyton as a coupling platform for integrated catchement models. Adv Geosci 27:51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lăcătuşu R, Iordache V (2008) Integrated modeling of geochemical and biogeochemical processes across space-time scales. In: Proceedings of the 8th International symposium on “Metal elements in environment, medicine and biology”, Eurobit Publishing House, Timişoara, pp 41–54Google Scholar
  52. Lăcătuşu R, Răuţă C, Cârstea S, Ghelase I (1996) Soil-plant-man relationships in heavy metal polluted areas in Romania. Appl Geochem 11:105–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lăcătuşu R, Răuţă C, Grigore C, Cârstea S, Ghelase I (1993) Geochemical and biogeochemical features of areas of haematuria in cattle in the Eastern Carpathian Mountains of Romania. Environ Geochem Health 15:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lăcatusu R, Citu G, Aston J, Lungu M, Lacatusu AR (2009) Heavy metals soil pollution state in relation to potential future mining activities in the Rosia Montana Area. Carp J Earth Environ Sci 4:39–50Google Scholar
  55. Lee MK, Saunders JA (2003) Effects of pH on metals precipitation and sorption: field bioremediation and geochemical modeling approaches. Vadose Zone J 2:177–185Google Scholar
  56. Lin H (2003) Hydropedology: bridging disciplines, scales, and data. Vadose Zone J 2:1–11Google Scholar
  57. Lin H (2010a) Earth’s critical zone and hydropedology: concepts, characteristics, and advances. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 14:25–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lin H (2010b) Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes. J Hydrol 393:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Lin H, Wheeler D, Bell J, Wilding L (2005) Assessment of soil spatial variability at multiple scales. Ecol Modell 182:271–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Liu P, Tang Y, Du R, Yang H, Wu Q, Qiu R (2010) Root foraging for zinc and cadmium requirement in the Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator plant Sedum alfredii. Plant Soil 327:365–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Loreau M, Nolf C-L (1993) Occupation of space by carabid beetle Abax ater. Acta Oecol 14:247–258Google Scholar
  62. Lottermoser BG, Ashley PM (2005) Tailings dam seepage at the rehabilitated Mary Kathleen uranium mine, Australia. J Geochem Explor 85:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Luck GW, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR (2003) Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol Evol 18:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lys J-A, Nentwig W (1991) Surface activity of carabid beetles inhabiting cereal fields. Pedobiologia 35:129–138Google Scholar
  65. Manfreda S, Smettem K, Iacobellis V, Montaldo N, Sivapalan M (2010) Coupled ecological-hydrological processes. Echohydrology 3:131–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Matyssek R, Schulin R, Günthardt-Goerg MS (2006) Metal fluxes and stresses in terrestrial ecosystems: synopsis towards holistic understanding. Snow Landsc Res 80:139–148Google Scholar
  67. McGuire KJ, McDonnell JJ (2006) A review and evaluation of catchment transit time modeling. J Hydrol 330:543–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Meijer J (1974) A comparative study of the immigration of carabids (Coleoptera, Carabidae) into a new polder. Oecologia 16:185–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Meirvenne M, Meklit T (2010) Geostatistical simulation for the assessment of regional soil pollution. Geograph Anal 42:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Meklit T, Van Meirvenne M, Verstraete S, Bonroy J, Tack F (2009) Combining marginal and spatial outliers identification to optimize the mapping of the regional geochemical baseline concentration of soil heavy metals. Geoderma 148:413–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mikkonen AV (1985) Establishment of breeding territory of the chaffinch, Fringilla coelebs, and the brambling, F. montifringilla, in northen Finland. Ann Zool Fenn 22:137–156Google Scholar
  72. Moga CI, Hartel T, Ollerer K (2009) Ancient oak wood-pasture as a habitat for the endangered tree pipit Anthus trivialis. Biologia 64:1011–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Morin PJ (2005) Community ecology. Blackwell, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  74. Nagorski SA, Moore JN, McKinnon TE, Smith DB (2003) Scale-dependent temoral variations in stream water geochemistry. Environ Sci Technol 37:859–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Neagoe A (coord) (2007a) Mathematical modeling of key mechanisms involved in metals mobility in terrestrial and wetlands ecosystems, Research project, University of Bucharest. http://www.mecoter.cesec.ro
  76. Neagoe A (coord) (2007b) Procedure for risk assessment and phytoremediation of contaminated areas, Research project, University of Bucharest. http://www.fitorisc.cesec.ro
  77. Neagoe A, Iordache V, Farcasanu I (2012) The role of organic matter in the mobility of metals in contaminated sites. In: Kothe E, Varma A (eds) Bio-geo-interactions in contaminated soils. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  78. Neagoe A, Iordache V, Kothe E (2011) A concept of biogeochemical role and the challenge of up-scaling the effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on metals mobility. In: Ebrahim Mohammadi Goltapeh, Younes Rezaee Danesh, Ajit Varma (eds) Fungi as bioremediators. Soil biology, Springer, Berlin, in pressGoogle Scholar
  79. Oborny B (1994) Spacer length in clonal plants and the efficiency of resource capture in heterogenous environments: a Monte Carlo simulation. Folia Geobot Phytotaxonomica 29:139–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Oborny B, Kun Á, Czárán T, Bokros S (2000) The effect of clonal integration on plant competition mosaic habitat space. Ecology 81:3291–3304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Odum HT (1995) Energy systems concepts and self-organisation: a rebuttal. Oecologia 104:518–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Oyama S, Griffiths PE, Gray RD (eds) (2000) Cycles of contingency: developmental systems and evolution. MIT, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  83. Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ, Lin HS (2006) Hydropedology and pedotransfer functions. Geoderma 131:308–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Pahl-Vostl C (1995) The dynamic nature of ecosystems. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Paton DC, Sinclair RG, Bentz CM (2005) Ecology and management of the common starling (sturnus vulgaris) in the McLaren Vale Region. Final report to Grape and Wine research & Development CorporationGoogle Scholar
  86. Patterson IJ, Cavallini P, Rolando A (1991) Density, range size and diet of the European Jay Garrulus glandarius in the Maremma Natural Park, Tuscany, Italy in Summer and AutumnCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Petrescu L (coord) (2007) Procedure for the economic assessment of stable pollutants retention in river systems. Research project, University of Bucharest. http://www.pecotox.cesec.ro
  88. Pinowski J (1987) Experimental studies on the dispersal of young tree sparrows. Ardea 55:241–248Google Scholar
  89. Pundt H, Bishr Y (2002) Domain ontologies for data sharing – an example from environmental monitoring using field GISGoogle Scholar
  90. Qi F, Zhu A-X, Harrower M, Burt JE (2006) Fuzzy soil mapping based on prototype category theory. Geoderma 136:774–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Răuţă C, Lăcătuşu R, Cârstea S (1995) Heavy metal pollution in Romania. In Salomons W, Forstner U, Mader P (eds) Heavy metals: problems and solutions, Springer, Berlin, pp 359–372Google Scholar
  92. Raworth DA, Choi M-Y (2001) Determining numbers of active carabid beetles per unit area from pitfall-trap data. Entomol Exp Appl 98:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Riecken U, Raths U (1996) Use of radio telemetry for studying dispersal and habitat use of Carabus coriaceus L. Ann Zool Fenn 33:109–116Google Scholar
  94. Robinson B, Schulin R, Nowack B, Roulier S, Menon M, Clothier B, Green S, Mills T (2006) Phytoremediation for the management of metal flux in contaminated sites. Snow Landsc Res 80:221–234Google Scholar
  95. Rodriguez B, Siverio F, Rodriguez A, Siverio M, Hernandez JJ (2010) Figuerola J, Density, habitat selection and breeding biology of Common Buzzards Buteo buteo in an insular environment. Bird Study 57:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rodriguez JA, Nanos N, Grau JM, Gil L, Arias ML (2008) Multiscale analysis of heavy metal contents in Spanish agricultural topsoils. Chemosphere 70:1085–1096PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Rösner S, Selva N, Müller T, Pugacewicz E, Laudet F (2005) Raven Corvus corax ecology in a primeval temperate forest. W: Corvids of Poland.Red. In: Jerzak L, et al. (eds) Bogucki Wyd. Nauk., Poznań, pp 385–405Google Scholar
  98. Rutz C (2006) Home range size, habitat use, activity patterns and hunting behaviour of urban-breeding Northern Goshawks Accipiter gentilis. Ardea 94:185–202Google Scholar
  99. Ryan A (2007) Emergence is coupled to scope, not to level. Complexity 13:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Saikkonen K, Koivunen S, Vuorisalo T, Mutikainen P (1998) Interactive effects of pollination and heavy metals on resource allocation in Potentilla anserina L. Ecology 79:1620–1629Google Scholar
  101. Saunders TJ, McClain ME, Llerena CA (2004) The biogeochemistry of surface and subsurface runoff in a small montane catchment of the Peruvian Amazon. Hydrol Process 20:2549–2562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Schaefli B, Harman CJ, Sivapalan M, Schymansky SJ (2011) Hydrologic predictions in a changing environment: behavioral modeling. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:635–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Schmitz O, Karssebnerg D, de Jong K, de Kok J-L (2011) Constructing integrated models: a scheduler to execute coupled components. In: Geertman S, Reinhardt W, Toppen F (eds), ISBN: 978-90-816960-1-2, In: Proceedings of AGILE 2011, The 14th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Advancing Geoinformation Science for a Changing World. http://plone.itc.nl/agile_old/Conference/2011-utrecht/contents/pdf/shortpapers/sp_98.pdf. Accessed July 2011
  104. Scrădeanu D, Ioane D, Chitea F, Tevi G (2010) The model moisture distribution in heterogenius soil under complexe hydrological conditions. Geophysical research abstracts 12: EGU2010-12863-1Google Scholar
  105. Scrădeanu D, Mezincescu M, Pagnejer M (2010) The monitoring and control of space-time moisture distribution in unsaturated soil with a sensitive informatic system. Geophys Res abstracts, 12, EGU2010-12900Google Scholar
  106. Scull P (2010) A top-down approach to the state factor paradigm for use in macroscale soil analysis. Ann Assoc Am Geograph 100:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Scull P, Franklin J., Chadwick OA, McArthur D (2003) Predictive soil mapping: a review, Progress in Physical Geography 27: 171–197Google Scholar
  108. Seppelt R (2003) Computer-based environmental management. Willey-VCH, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  109. Silvertown J, Charlesworth D (2001) Introduction to plant population biology, 4th edn. Blackwell, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  110. Sim IMW, Cross AV, Lamacraft DL, Pain DJ (2001) Correlates of common Buzzard Buteo buteo density and breeding success in the West Midlands. Bird Study 48(3):317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Simpson LS, Maher EJ, Jolley DF (2004) Process controlling metal transport and retention as metal-contaminated ground water efflux through estuarine sediments, Chemosphere, 56:821–831Google Scholar
  112. Snapp BD (1976) Colonial breeding in the barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) and its adaptive significance. Condor 78:341–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Squires JR, Kennedy PL (2006) Northern Goshawk ecology: an assessment of current knowledge and information needs for conservation and management. Stud J Avian Biol 31:8–62Google Scholar
  114. Srivastava P, Migliaccio KW, Šimůnek J (2007) Landscape models for simulating water quality at point, field, and watershed scales. Transact ASABE 50:1683–1693Google Scholar
  115. Stockdale A, Davison W, Zhang H (2009) Micro-scale biogeochemical heterogeneity in sediments: a review of available technology and observed evidence. Earth Sci Rev 92:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Stuefer JF (1997) Division of labour in clonal plants? On the response of stoloniferous herbs to environmental heterogeneity, Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  117. Sui DZ, Maggio RC (1999) Integrating GIS with hydrological modelling: practices, problems, and prospects, Computers. Environ Urban Syst 23:33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Suzuki J-I, Stuefer JF (1999) On the ecological and evolutionary significance of storage in clonal plants. Plant Species Biol 14:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Tamm A, Kull K, Sammul M (2002) Classifying clonal growth forms based on vegetative mobility and ramet longevity: a whole community analysis. Evol Ecol 15:383–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Tercier-Waeber ML, Hezard T, Masson M, Schafer J (2009) In situ monitoring of the diurnal cycling of dynamic metal species in a stream under contrasting photobenthic biofilm activity and hydrological conditions. Environ Sci Technol 43:7137–9244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Tercier-Waeber ML, Taillefert M (2008) Remote in situ voltammetric techniques to characterize the biogeochemical cycling of trace metals in aquatic systems. J Environ Monit 10:30–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Thiele HU (1977) Carabid beetles in their environment. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  123. Thompson SE, Harman CJ, Troch PA, Brooks PD, Sivapalan M (2011) Spatial scale dependence of ecohydrology mediated water balance partitioning: a syntheses framework for catchement ecohydrology. Water Res 47: W00J03Google Scholar
  124. Van Rossum F, Bonnin I, Fenart S, Pauwels M, Petit D, Saumitou-Laprade P (2004) Spatial genetic structure within metallicolous population of Arabidopsis halleri, a clonal, self-incompatible and heavy-metal-tolerant species. Mol Ecol 13:2959–2967PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Vidon P, Allan C, Burns D, Duval N, Gurwick S, Inandar S, Lowrance R, Okay J, Scott D, Sebestyen S (2010) Hot sports and hot moments in riparian zones: potential for improved water quality management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 46:278–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Viollier E, Rabouille C, Apitz SE, Breuer E, Chaillou G, Dedieu K, Furukawa Y, Grenz C, Hall P, Janssen F, Morford JL, Poggiale JC, Roberts S, Shimmield T, Taillefert M, Tengberg A, Wenzhofer F, Witte U (2003) Benthic biogeochemistry: state of the art technologies and guidelines for the future of in situ survey. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 285–286:5–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Vogl W (2004) Habitat and space use of european cuckoo females during the egg laying period. Behaviour 141:881–898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. Wagener T, Sivapalan M, Troch PA, McGlynn BL, Harman CJ, Gupta HV, Kumar P, Rao PSC, Basu NB, Wilson JS (2010) The future of hydrology: an evolving science for a changing world. Water Resour Res 46:W05301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. Warren LA, Haack EA (2001) Biogeochemical controls on metal behavior in freshwater environments. Earth Sci Rev 54:261–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. White J (1989) The plant as a metapopulation. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 10:109–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. Widdén B, Cronberg N, Widdén M (1994) Genotypic diversity, molecular markers and spatial distribution of genets in clonal plants – a literature survey. Folia Geobot Phytotax 29:245–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. Xiaoni H, Hong L, Danfeng S, Liandi Z, Baoguo L (2010) Multi-scale spatial structure of heavy metals in agricultural soils in Beijing. Environ Monit Assess 164:605–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Iordache
    • 1
  • R. Lăcătuşu
    • 2
  • D. Scrădeanu
    • 3
  • M. Onete
    • 4
  • S. Ion
    • 5
  • I. Cobzaru
    • 4
  • A. Neagoe
    • 1
  • F. Bodescu
    • 1
  • D. Jianu
    • 6
  • D. Purice
    • 4
  1. 1.Research Centre for Ecological Services (CESEC), Faculty of BiologyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry (ICPA)BucharestRomania
  3. 3.Laboratory of Hydrogeology, Faculty of Geology and GeophysicsUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania
  4. 4.Institute of Biology BucharestRomanian AcademyBucharestRomania
  5. 5.Institute of Mathematical Statistics and Applied MathematicsRomanian AcademyBucharestRomania
  6. 6.Lythos Research Center, Faculty of GeologyUniversity of BucharestBucharestRomania

Personalised recommendations