Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Pseudo Relevance Feedback for Ad-hoc Retrieval

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6931))

Abstract

This paper presents an initial investigation in the relative effectiveness of different popular pseudo relevance feedback (PRF) methods. The retrieval performance of relevance model, and two KL-divergence-based divergence from randomness (DFR) feedback methods generalized from Rocchio’s algorithm, are compared by extensive experiments on standard TREC test collections. Results show that a KL-divergence based DFR method (denoted as KL1), combined with the classical Rocchio’s algorithm, has the best retrieval effectiveness out of the three methods studied in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amati, G.: Probabilistic models for information retrieval based on divergence from randomness. PhD thesis, DCS, Univ. of Glasgow (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carpineto, C., de Mori, R., Romano, G., Bigi, B.: An information-theoretic approach to automatic query expansion. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 19(1), 1–27 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lavrenko, V., Croft, W.B.: Relevance-Based Language Models. In: SIGIR, pp. 120–127 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lv, Y., Zhai, C.: A comparative study of methods for estimating query language models with pseudo feedback. In: CIKM, pp. 1895–1898 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robertson, S.E., Walker, S., Hancock-Beaulieu, M., Gatford, M., Payne, A.: Okapi at TREC-4. In: TREC (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Rocchio, J.: Relevance feedback in information retrieval. In: The SMART Retrieval System. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, Z., He, B., Huang, X., Lin, H.: Revisiting Rocchio’s Relevance Feedback Algorithm for Probabilistic Models. In: Cheng, P.-J., Kan, M.-Y., Lam, W., Nakov, P. (eds.) AIRS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6458, pp. 151–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhai, C., Lafferty, J.D.: Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. In: CIKM, pp. 403–410 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hui, K., He, B., Luo, T., Wang, B. (2011). A Comparative Study of Pseudo Relevance Feedback for Ad-hoc Retrieval. In: Amati, G., Crestani, F. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval Theory. ICTIR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6931. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23318-0_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23318-0_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23317-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23318-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics