Skip to main content

Negation for Document Re-ranking in Ad-hoc Retrieval

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6931))

Abstract

Information about top-ranked documents plays a key role to improve retrieval performance. One of the most common strategies which exploits this kind of information is relevance feedback. Few works have investigated the role of negative feedback on retrieval performance. This is probably due to the difficulty of dealing with the concept of non-relevant document. This paper proposes a novel approach to document re-ranking, which relies on the concept of negative feedback represented by non-relevant documents. In our model the concept of non-relevance is defined as a quantum operator in both the classical Vector Space Model and a Semantic Document Space. The latter is induced from the original document space using a distributional approach based on Random Indexing. The evaluation carried out on a standard document collection shows the effectiveness of the proposed approach and opens new perspectives to address the problem of quantifying the concept of non-relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agirre, E., Di Nunzio, G.M., Mandl, T., Otegi, A.: CLEF 2009 Ad Hoc Track Overview: Robust-WSD Task. In: Peters, C., Di Nunzio, G.M., Kurimo, M., Mostefa, D., Penas, A., Roda, G. (eds.) CLEF 2009. LNCS, vol. 6241, pp. 36–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Birkhoff, G., von Neumann, J.: The logic of quantum mechanics. Annals of Mathematics 37(4), 823–843 (1936)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Caputo, A., Basile, P., Semeraro, G.: From fusion to re-ranking: a semantic approach. In: Crestani, F., Marchand-Maillet, S., Chen, H.H., Efthimiadis, E.N., Savoy, J. (eds.) SIGIR, pp. 815–816. ACM, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Danilowicz, C., Balinski, J.: Document ranking based upon Markov chains. Information Processing & Management 37(4), 623–637 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Dasgupta, S., Gupta, A.: An elementary proof of a theorem of Johnson and Lindenstrauss. Random Structures & Algorithms 22(1), 60–65 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Diaz, F.: Regularizing ad hoc retrieval scores. In: CIKM 2005: Proceedings of the 14th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 672–679. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Harris, Z.: Mathematical Structures of Language. Interscience, New York (1968)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanerva, P.: Sparse Distributed Memory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kozorovitzky, A., Kurland, O.: From ”identical” to ”similar”: Fusing retrieved lists based on inter-document similarities. In: Azzopardi, L., Kazai, G., Robertson, S., Rüger, S., Shokouhi, M., Song, D., Yilmaz, E. (eds.) ICTIR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5766, pp. 212–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kurland, O.: Re-ranking search results using language models of query-specific clusters. Information Retrieval 12(4), 437–460 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurland, O., Lee, L.: Corpus structure, language models, and ad hoc information retrieval. In: SIGIR 2004: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 194–201. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Landauer, T.K., Dumais, S.T.: A Solution to Plato’s Problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis Theory of Acquisition, Induction, and Representation of Knowledge. Psychological Review 104(2), 211–240 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu, X., Croft, W.B.: Cluster-based retrieval using language models. In: SIGIR 2004: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 186–193. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. van Rijsbergen, C.J.: Information Retrieval. Butterworth, London (1979)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson, S., Zaragoza, H., Taylor, M.: Simple BM25 extension to multiple weighted fields. In: CIKM 2004: Proceedings of the Thirteenth ACM Int. Conf. on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 42–49. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ruthven, I., Lalmas, M.: A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems. Knowledge Engineering Review 18(2), 95–145 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sahlgren, M.: The Word-Space Model: Using distributional analysis to represent syntagmatic and paradigmatic relations between words in high-dimensional vector spaces. Ph.D. thesis, Stockholm University, Department of Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Salton, G., Buckley, C.: Improving retrieval performance by relevance feedback. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(4), 288–297 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singhal, A., Mitra, M., Buckley, C.: Learning routing queries in a query zone. In: SIGIR 1997: Proceedings of the 20th Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 25–32. ACM, New York (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Tseng, Y., Tsai, C., Chuang, Z.: On the robustness of document re-ranking techniques: a comparison of label propagation, knn, and relevance feedback. In: Proceedings of NTCIR-6 Workshop (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, X., Fang, H., Zhai, C.: A study of methods for negative relevance feedback. In: SIGIR 2008: Proceedings of the 31st Annual Int. ACM SIGIR Conf. on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 219–226. ACM, New York (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Widdows, D., Peters, S.: Word vectors and quantum logic: Experiments with negation and disjunction. Mathematics of language (8), 141–154 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Widdows, D.: Orthogonal negation in vector spaces for modelling word-meanings and document retrieval. In: ACL 2003: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 136–143. Association for Computational Linguistics, Morristown (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Basile, P., Caputo, A., Semeraro, G. (2011). Negation for Document Re-ranking in Ad-hoc Retrieval. In: Amati, G., Crestani, F. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval Theory. ICTIR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6931. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23318-0_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23318-0_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23317-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23318-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics