Skip to main content

Ontologies and Similarity

  • Conference paper
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6880))

Included in the following conference series:

Introduction

Ontologies [9] comprise a definition of concepts describing their commonalities (genus proximum) as well as their differences (differentia specifica). One might think that with the definition of commonalities and differences, the definition of similarities in and for ontologies should follow immediately. Traditionally, however, the contrary is true, because the method background of ontologies, i.e. logics-based representations, and similarity, i.e. geometry-based representations, have been explored in disjoint communities that have mixed only to a limited extent. In this short paper we survey how our own work touches on the intersection between ontologies and similarity. While this cannot be a comprehensive account of the interrelationship between ontologies and similarity, we aim it to be a stepping stone for inspiration and for indicating entry points for future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bloehdorn, S., Sure, Y.: Kernel methods for mining instance data in ontologies. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 58–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Cimiano, P., Hotho, A., Staab, S.: Learning concept hierarchies from text corpora using formal concept analysis. JAIR — Journal of AI Research 24, 305–339 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. d’Amato, C.: Similarity-based Learning Methods for the Semantic Web. PhD thesis, University of Bari (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. d’Amato, C., Staab, S., Fanizzi, N.: On the influence of description logics ontologies on conceptual similarity. In: Gangemi, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) EKAW 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5268, pp. 48–63. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Amato, C., Staab, S., Fanizzi, N., Esposito, F.: Dl-link: A conceptual clustering algorithm for indexing description logics knowledge bases. International Journal of Semantic Computing 4(4), 453–486 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Dellschaft, K., Staab, S.: On how to perform a gold standard based evaluation of ontology learning. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 228–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ehrig, M., Staab, S., Sure, Y.: Bootstrapping ontology alignment methods with apfel. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 186–200. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Guarino, N., Oberle, D., Staab, S.: What is an ontology? In: Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd revised edn. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hotho, A., Staab, S., Stumme, G.: Ontologies improve text document clustering. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM 2003. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Klusch, M., Fries, B., Sycara, K.P.: Owls-mx: A hybrid semantic web service matchmaker for owl-s services. Journal of Web Semantics 7(2), 121–133 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring similarity between ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 251–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxanomy. In: Proc. of Int. Joint Conf. for Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pp. 448–453 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.): Handbook on Ontologies, 2nd revised edn. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ashwin Ram Nirmalie Wiratunga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Staab, S. (2011). Ontologies and Similarity. In: Ram, A., Wiratunga, N. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6880. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23291-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23291-6_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23290-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23291-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics