Advertisement

The Impact of the Control Plane Architecture on the QoS in the GMPLS Network

  • P. Rozycki
  • J. Korniak
  • J. Kolbusz
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 98)

Abstract

The influence of the control plane architecture on the quality of services offered by the GMPLS network is considered in this paper. Several simulation experiments are prepared to verify this influence. The simulations assume separation of the functional planes of GMPLS and two typical topologies ring and mesh. The GMPLS control plane simulator, prepared by authors, simulate most of the control plane behavior by including OSPF-TE, RSVP-TE, protection and restoration procedures. The simulation results confirm quality of services improvement by providing additional interconnection in the control plane.

Keywords

Control Plane Failure Detection Data Plane Mesh Topology Additional Link 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Adami et al. 2005]
    Adami, D., et al.: Signalling protocols in diffserv-aware MPLS networks: design and implementation of RSVP-TE network simulator. In: IEEE GLOBECOM 2005, St. Louis, MO, USA (2005)Google Scholar
  2. [Cholda 2005]
    Cholda, P.: The reliability analysis of recovery procedures in GMPLS-based optical IP networks. PhD Thesis, Krakow (2005)Google Scholar
  3. [Komolafe at al. 2008]
    Komolafe, O., Sventek, J.: Impact of GMPLS control message loss. J. of Lightwave Technology 26(14), 2029–2036 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [Jajszczyk 2005]
    Jajszczyk, A.: Automatically switched optical networks: benefits and requirements. IEEE Communication Magazine 43(2), S10–S15 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [Li at al. 2002]
    Li, G., Yates, J., Wang, D., Kalmanek, C.: Control plane design for reliable optical networks. IEEE Communication Magazine, 90–96 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. [Manie et al.2004]
    Mannie, E., et al. (eds.): Generalized multi-protocol label switching (GMPLS) Architecture, RFC3945 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. [Perello at al. 2007]
    Perello, J., Spadaro, S., Comellas, J., Junyent, G.: An Analytical study of control plane failures impact on gmpls ring optical networks. IEEE Communications Letters 11(8), 695–697 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [Rozycki at al. 2007]
    Rozycki, P., Korniak, J., Jajszczyk, A.: Failure detection and notification in GMPLS control plane. Presented at the Workshop on GMPLS Performance Evaluation: Control Plane Resilience, Glasgow (2007)Google Scholar
  9. [Rozycki and Korniak 2008]
    Rozycki, P., Korniak, J.: Influence of the control plane architecture on QoS in the GMPLS network. IEEE Human System Interaction (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Rozycki
    • 1
  • J. Korniak
    • 1
  • J. Kolbusz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electronics and TelecommunicationsUniversity of Information Technology and ManagementRzeszowPoland

Personalised recommendations