Framework for Measuring Effectiveness of Preventive Maintenance for Velocity of Robot Soccer

  • Mohd Zaidi Bin Mahmud
  • Che Seman Bin Che Cob
  • Mohd Faizul Emizal Bin Mohd Ghazi
  • Shahnorbanun Sahran
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 212)


Soccer Robotics is the field that combines multiple important discipline including artificial intelligence and mobile robotics. The framework for the complementary purposes of research and education in multi-agent robotics arises for exploration of new technology. Preventive maintenance is essential thing to preserve aging of Robot Soccer Mirosot and also to decrease the costing to maintain performance of the robot. This paper will be discussing a framework classified as model-specific to execute preventive maintenance for Robot Soccer as follow the standard of procedure. A plan schedule of preventive maintenance established quarterly will be considered the physical robot situated in a real environment and it’s reactive, proactive and communicative. The primary goal of this framework preventive maintenance it will be use as standard of procedure to anyone during handling maintenance of Robot Soccer Mirosot. It also to prevent the failure of Robot Soccer before it actually occurs. It is designed to preserve and enhance equipment reliability by replacing defect components before they actually fail.


Preventive Maintenance Mobile Robotic Cogeneration Plant Robot Soccer Auxiliary Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Kim, J.-H., Kim, D.-H., Kim, Y.-J., Seow, K.-T.: Soccer Robotics. Springer, Heiderberg (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, C.-T.: Dynamic preventive maintenance strategy for an aging and deteriorating production system. Ta-Hwa Institute of Technology, Hsinchu 307, Taiwan (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Mishari, S.T.: Modelling Preventive Maintenance for AuxiliaryComponenets. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Roux, O., Duvivier, D., Quesnal, G., Ramat, E.: Optimizing of Preventive Maintenance through combined maintenance-production simulation model (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nosoohi, I., Hejazi, S.R.: A multi-objective approach to simultaneous determination of spare part numbers and preventive replacement times. Applied Mathematical Modelling (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bartholomew-Biggs, M., et al.: Modelling and optimizing sequential imperfect preventive maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 53–62 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Selvik, J.T., Aven, T.: A framework for reliability and risk centered maintenance. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 324–333 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mann, L., Saxena, A., Knapp, G.M.: Statistical-based or condition-based preventive maintenance? Journal of Quality in Maintenance 1(1), 45–59 (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alardhi, M., Hannam, R.G.: Preventive Maintenance Scheduling for multi-cogeneration plants with production constraints. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 13(3), 276–292 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stern, L.D.: A Visual Approach to SPSS for Windows. A Guide to SPSS 15.0. Pearson Education Inc., London (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohd Zaidi Bin Mahmud
    • 1
  • Che Seman Bin Che Cob
    • 1
  • Mohd Faizul Emizal Bin Mohd Ghazi
    • 1
  • Shahnorbanun Sahran
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentPoliteknik Kota BharuKota Bharu
  2. 2.Pattern Recognition Research Group, CAIT, Faculty of Information Science and Technologyuniversiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangi

Personalised recommendations