Requirements Analysis and Critical Requirement Derivation Method Using Macrostruktur

  • Yong-Kyun Cho
  • Young-Bum Park
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 200)


As software is varied and grew in size, the importance of clear understanding and representing customer’s need, has been emphasized. It is not easy to drive and define critical system needs, since requirements in early stage of the development, is abstract and conceptual. In this paper, to drive clear customer’s requirements, Macrostruktur concept of textlinguistics is used. First, Macrostruktur of textlinguistics is used to analysis descriptive requirements. Second, Macrostruktur-rule is applied to analyzed Macrostruktur data in order to derive Macrostruktur-propositions. Finally, it is implemented to derived Macrostruktur-propositions.


critical requrirement requirement derication requirements analysis Macrostruktur Macrostruktur-rule 


  1. 1.
    Soonll cha, The Present and Prospect of Software Testing Industry, Korea Information Science Society, Communications Of The Korea Information Science Society, 28(11), 79–85 (2010); The Standish Group, Standish Group Report (2005) Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    The Standish Group, Standish Group Report (2005) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, B.G., Hwang, M.S., Lee, Y., Lee, H.J., Baik, J., Lee, C.-k.: Design and Development of a Standard Guidance for Software Requirement Specification, Korea Information Science Society. Journal of KISS: Software and Applications 36(7), 531–538 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Choi, J.-E., Choi, S.-K., Lee, S.-A.: The Case Study of Software Requirement Management. Korea Information Science Society 291(B), 445–447 (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Easterbrook, B.N.S.: Requirements Engineering: A Roadmap. In: ICSE 2000 Proceedings of the Conference on The Future of Software Engineering (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kung, S.H., Lee, J.-K., Namgoong, H.: Analysis and Verification of Functional Requirements for GLORY using UML. The Korea Contents Society, Journal Of The Korea Contents Association 8(5), 61–71 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kang Changu, Understanding Textlinuistics (2004) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    김재봉, 텍스트 연구회 편 : 문 주제 중심의 텍스트 요약과 거시규칙, 한국텍스트언어학회 텍스트언어학 (1995) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    서혁, 요약 능력과 요약 규칙, 국어교육학회 국어교육학연구 (1994년) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Dijk, Textlinguistics (1995) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    텍스트 요약 전략에 대한 국어교육학적 연구, 김재봉 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Einführung in die Textlinguistik. Tübingen: Niemeyer. , de Beaugrande, Robert-Alain/Dressler, Wolfgang Ulrich (1981) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden., Brinker, Klaus, Linguistische Textanalyse. 3., durchges. und erweit. Aufl. Berlin: Schmidt (1992) Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Textlinguistik., Coseriu, Eugenio, Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr (1980) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Textlinguistik. Eine Einführung., Heinemann, Wolfgang/Viehweger, Dieter, Tübingen: Niemeyer (1991) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    van Dijk, T.A.: The Study of Discourse. In: van Dijk, T.A. (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Bd. I: Discourse as Structure and Process, pp. 1–34. Sage, London (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yong-Kyun Cho
    • 1
  • Young-Bum Park
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer ScienceUniversity of DankookChungnamKorea

Personalised recommendations