Skip to main content

Agnostic Domain Adaptation

  • Conference paper
  • 1896 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6835))

Abstract

The supervised learning paradigm assumes in general that both training and test data are sampled from the same distribution. When this assumption is violated, we are in the setting of transfer learning or domain adaptation: Here, training data from a source domain, aim to learn a classifier which performs well on a target domain governed by a different distribution. We pursue an agnostic approach, assuming no information about the shift between source and target distributions but relying exclusively on unlabeled data from the target domain. Previous works [2] suggest that feature representations, which are invariant to domain change, increases generalization. Extending these ideas, we prove a generalization bound for domain adaptation that identifies the transfer mechanism: what matters is how much learnt classier itself is invariant, while feature representations may vary. Our bound is much tighter for rich hypothesis classes, which may only contain invariant classifier, but can not be invariant altogether. This concept is exemplified by the computer vision tasks of semantic segmentation and image categorization. Domain shift is simulated by introducing some common imaging distortions, such as gamma transform and color temperature shift. Our experiments on a public benchmark dataset confirm that using domain adapted classifier significantly improves accuracy when distribution changes are present.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold, A., Nallapati, R., Cohen, W.W.: A comparative study of methods for transductive transfer learning. In: ICDM Workshop on Mining and Management of Biological Data (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-David, S., Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., Pereira, F.: Analysis of representations for domain adaptation. In: NIPS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bickel, S., Brückner, M., Scheffer, T.: Discriminative learning for differing training and test distributions. In: ICML. ACM Press, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blitzer, J., Crammer, K., Kulesza, A., Pereira, F., Wortman, J.: Learning bounds for domain adaptation. In: NIPS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blitzer, J., Mcdonald, R., Pereira, F.: Domain adaptation with structural correspondence learning. In: Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Sydney, Australia (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chapelle, O., Schölkopf, B., Zien, A. (eds.): Semi-Supervised Learning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leistner, C., Saffari, A., Santner, J., Bischof, H.: Semi-supervised random forests. In: ICCV (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dai, W., Yang, Q., Xue, G.-R., Yu, Y.: Boosting for transfer learning. In: ICML, New York, NY, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Triggs, B., Moosmann, F., Jurie, F.: Fast discriminative visual codebooks using randomized clustering forests. In: NIPS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang, J., Smola, A.J., Gretton, A., Borgwardt, K.M., Sch?olkopf, B.: Correcting sample selection bias by unlabeled data. In: NIPS (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mansour, Y., Mohri, M., Rostamizadeh, A.: Domain adaptation with multiple sources. In: NIPS (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schweikert, G., Widmer, C., Scho”lkopf, B., Ra”tsch, G.: An empirical analysis of domain adaptation algorithms for genomic sequence analysis. In: NIPS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shotton, J., Johnson, M., Cipolla, R.: Semantic texton forests for image categorization and segmentation. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 5305, Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vapnik, V.N.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vezhnevets, A., Buhmann, J.M. (2011). Agnostic Domain Adaptation. In: Mester, R., Felsberg, M. (eds) Pattern Recognition. DAGM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6835. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23123-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23123-0_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23122-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23123-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics