Abstract
Product awareness is an important aspect of online shopping decisions. Contemporary product catalogs aim at improving customers’ decisions through products search and filtration. Form-based tools that are offered filter out products that do not fully match stated requirements, leading to lower product awareness and thus affecting overall decision quality. This research proposes preference relaxation as an alternative to existing similarity-based product recommendation agents used in such context. Building on previous work, we discuss two variants of a novel method for preference relaxation, so called Soft-Boundary Preference Relaxation with Addition and with Replacement, and evaluate their effect on product awareness in a user experiment with 87 participants. Our results indicate that the preference relaxation methods, in particular the Soft-Boundary Preference Relaxation with Replacement, can be successfully used to improve customers’ product awareness in online catalogues.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Viappiani, P., Pu, P., Faltings, B.: Preference-based search with adaptive recommendations. AI Communications 21(2-3), 155–175 (2008)
Hagen, P.R., Manning, H., Paul, Y.: Must search stink? Technical report (June 2000)
Pu, P., Chen, L., Kumar, P.: Evaluating product search and recommender systems for e-commerce environments 8, 1–27 (June 2008)
Bridge, D., Ricci, F.: Supporting product selection with query editing recommen- dations. In: Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, New York (2007)
Resnick, P., Varian, H.R.: Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM 40(3), 56–58 (1997)
McSherry, D.: Retrieval failure and recovery in recommender systems. In: 15th Artificial Intelligence and Cognitive Science Conference (AICS 2004), Castlebar, Ireland, pp. 319–338. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Mirzadeh, N., Ricci, F.: Cooperative query rewriting for decision making support and recommender systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence 21(10), 895–932 (2007)
Dabrowski, M., Acton, T.: Comparing techniques for preference relaxation: a decision theory perspective. In: 11th International Conference on Electronic Commerce and Web Technologies, EC-Web 2010 (2010)
Adomavicius, G., Tuzhilin, A.: Toward the next generation of recommender systems: A survey of the state-of-the-art and possible extensions. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 17(6), 734–749 (2005)
Smyth, B., McClave, P.: Similarity vs. diversity. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning: Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Cao, H., Chen, E., Yang, J., Xiong, H.: Enhancing recommender systems under volatile userinterest drifts. In: CIKM 2009: Proceeding of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1257–1266. ACM, New York (2009), doi:10.1145/1645953.1646112
Klenosky, D.B., Perkins, W.S.: Deriving attribute utilities from consideration sets: An alternative to self-explicated utilities. Advances in Consumer Research 19(1), 657–663 (1992)
Klein, N.M.: Assessing unacceptable attribute levels in conjoint-analysis. Advances in Consumer Research 14, 154–158 (1987)
Chaudhuri, S.: Generalization and a framework for query modification. In: Proceedings: 6th International Conference on Data Engineering, pp. 138–145. IEEE Computer Soc Press, Los Alamitos (1990)
Keeney, R., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)
Burke, R.: Interactive critiquing forcatalog navigation in e-commerce. Artificial Intelligence Review 18(3-4), 245–267 (2002)
Vahidov, R., Ji, F.: A diversity-based method for infrequent purchase decision support in e-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 4(2), 143 (2005)
Xiao, B., Benbasat, I.: E-commerce product recommendation agents: Use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly 31(1), 137–209 (2007)
Viappiani, P., Faltings, B.: Implementing example-based tools for preference-based search. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web Engineering. ACM, New York (2006)
Stahl, A.: Approximation of utility functions by learning similarity measures. In: Logic versus Approximation. LNCS, pp. 150–172. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Pereira, R.E.: Optimizing human-computer interaction for the electronic commerce environment. Journal of Electronic Commerce 1(1), 23–44 (2000)
Mcginty, L., Smyth, B.: On the role of diversity in conversational recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning, pp. 276–290. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
McSherry, D.: Similarity and compromise. In: Ashley, K.D., Bridge, D.G. (eds.) ICCBR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2689, pp. 291–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Fan, W., Gordon, M.D., Pathak, P.: Effective profiling of consumer information retrieval needs: a unified framework and empirical comparison. Decision Support Systems 40(2), 213–233 (2005)
Pu, P., Viappiani, P., Faltings, B.: Increasing user decision accuracy using suggestions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, New York (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dabrowski, M., Acton, T. (2011). Beyond Similarity-Based Recommenders: Preference Relaxation and Product Awareness. In: Huemer, C., Setzer, T. (eds) E-Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 85. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23014-1_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23014-1_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23013-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23014-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)