Skip to main content

An Exploratory Work in Using Comparisons Instead of Ratings

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 85))

Abstract

With the evolution of the Web, users are now encouraged to express their preferences on items. These are often conveyed through a rating value on a multi-point rating scale (for example from one to five). Ratings have however several known drawbacks, such as imprecision and inconsistency. We propose a new modality to express preferences: comparing items (“I prefer x to y”). In this initial work, we conduct two user-studies to understand the possible relevance of comparisons. This work shows that users are favorably predisposed to adopt this new modality. Moreover, it shows that preferences expressed as ratings are coherent with preferences expressed trough comparisons, and to some extent equivalent. As a proof of concept, a recommender is implemented using comparison data, where we show encouraging results when confronted to a classical rating-based recommender. As a consequence, asking users to express their preferences through comparisons, in place of ratings, is a promising new modality for preference-expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amatriain, X., Pujol, J.M., Oliver, N.: I like it.. I like it not: Evaluating User Ratings Noise in Recommender Systems. In: Proc. of UMAP Conf. (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amoo, T., Friedman, H.: Do numeric values influence subjects’ responses to rating scales? J. of International Marketing and Marketing Research 26, 41–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brun, A., Hamad, A., Buffet, O., Boyer, A.: Towards preference relations in recommender systems. In: Workshop on Preference Learning at ECML-PKDD (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Candillier, L., Meyer, F., Boullé, M.: Comparing state-of-the-art collaborative filtering systems. In: Proc. of 5th International Conference on Machine Learning and Data Mining in Pattern Recognition (MLMD), pp. 548–562 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carterette, B., Bennett, P.: Evaluation measures for preference judgments. In: Proc. of the Annual ACM SIGIR Conference, pp. 685–686 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carterette, B., Bennett, P., Chickering, D., Dumais, S.: Here or there; preference judgments for relevance. In: Proc. of ECIR, pp. 16–27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cena, F., Vernero, F., Gena, C.: Towards a customization of rating scales in adaptive systems. In: Proc. of the User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP), pp. 369–374 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, L., Pu, P.: Experiments on the preference-based organization interface in recommender systems. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact 17, 5:1–5:33 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cosley, D., Lam, S., Albert, I., Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users’ opinions. In: Proc. of the Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jones, N., Brun, A., Boyer, A.: Initial Perspectives From Preferences Expressed Through Comparisons. In: Int. Conf. on Human-Computer Interaction (July 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Comparison-based recommendation. In: Craw, S., Preece, A.D. (eds.) ECCBR 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2416, pp. 575–589. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Preston, C., Colman, A.: Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica 104(1), 1–15 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schafer, B., Frankowski, D., Herlocker, J., Sen, S.: Collaborative Filtering Recommender Systems. In: The Adaptive Web. Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization, pp. 291–324. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Turney, P.: Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In: Proc. of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pp. 417–424 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jones, N., Brun, A., Boyer, A., Hamad, A. (2011). An Exploratory Work in Using Comparisons Instead of Ratings. In: Huemer, C., Setzer, T. (eds) E-Commerce and Web Technologies. EC-Web 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 85. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23014-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23014-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23013-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23014-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics