Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Sequential Quality of Experience Modelling and Measurement

  • Karan Mitra
  • Arkady Zaslavsky
  • Christer Åhlund
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6869)

Abstract

This paper presents a novel context-aware methodology for modelling and measuring user-perceived quality of experience (QoE) over time. In particular, we create a context-aware model for QoE modelling and measurement using dynamic Bayesian networks (DBN) and a context-aware state-space approach. The proposed model is then used to infer and determine users’ QoE in a sequential manner. We performed experimentation to validate the proposed model. The results prove that it can efficiently model, reason and measure QoE of the users’.

Keywords

Algorithm Bayesian network dynamic Bayesian network context-awareness quality of experience quality of service 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Genie software package, http://genie.sis.pitt.edu/about.html (access date: January 02, 2011)
  2. 2.
    ETSI STF 354. Guidelines and tutorials for improving the user experience of real-time communication services, http://portal.etsi.org/stfs/STF_HomePages/STF354/Default.aspx?Selection=Home
  3. 3.
    Brooks, P., Hestnes, B.: User measures of quality of experience: why being objective and quantitative is important. IEEE Network 24(2), 8–13 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Moor, K., Ketyko, I., Joseph, W., Deryckere, T., De Marez, L., Martens, L., Verleye, G.: Proposed framework for evaluating quality of experience in a mobile, testbed-oriented living lab setting. Mob. Netw. Appl. 15, 378–391 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    ITU-T Recommendation G.107. ITU-T Recommendation G.107, Methods for subjective determination of transmission quality (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ITU-T Recommendation G.113. Appendix I: Provisional planning values for the equipment impairment factor Ie (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heckerman, D.: A tutorial on learning with bayesian networks. In: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Learning in Graphical Models, pp. 301–354. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brooks, B., Hestnes, P., Heiestad: QoE (quality of experience) - measuring qoe for improving the usage of telecommunications services. Technical report (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jumisko-Pyykkö, S., Hannuksela, M.M.: Does context matter in quality evaluation of mobile television? In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, MobileHCI 2008, pp. 63–72. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Martens, J.: Measuring the dynamics of remembered experience over time. Interacting with Computers 22(5), 328–335 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, L., Zhou, W., Song, J.: The research of quality of experience evaluation method in pervasive computing environment. In: 1st International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, pp. 178–182 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mitra, K., Åhlund, C., Zaslavsky, A.: A decision-theoretic approach for quality of experience measurement and prediction. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, ICME (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mitra, K., Zaslavsky, A., Åhlund, C.: A probabilistic context-aware approach for quality of experience measurement in pervasive systems. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moebs, S.A.: A learner, is a learner, is a user, is a customer: Qos-based experience-aware adaptation. In: MM 2008: Proceeding of the 16th ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 1035–1038. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Moller, S., Engelbrecht, K.-P., Kuhnel, C., Wechsung, I., Weiss, B.: A taxonomy of quality of service and quality of experience of multimodal human-machine interaction. In: International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience, QoMEx 2009, pp. 7–12 (29-31, 2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Moller, S., Waltermann, M., Lewcio, B., Kirschnick, N., Vidales, P.: Speech quality while roaming in next generation networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications, ICC 2009, pp. 1–5 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nokia. Quality of Experience (QoE) of mobile services: can it be measured and improved? white paper (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Padovitz, A., Loke, S.W., Zaslavsky, A., Burg, B., Bartolini, C.: An approach to data fusion for context awareness. Modeling and Using Context, 353–367Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Perkis, A., Munkeby, S., Hillestad, O.I.: A model for measuring quality of experience. In: Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Signal Processing Symposium, NORSIG 2006, pp. 198–201 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norvig, P., Russel, S.: Artificial Intelligence: A modern approach, 2nd edn. (2006)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Soldani, D.: Means and methods for collecting and analyzing qoe measurements in wireless networks. In: International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, WoWMoM 2006, pp. 531–535 (2006)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sung, J.: Football on Mobile Phones: Algorithms, Architectures and quality of experience in streaming video. PhD thesis, Umeå University (2006)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Key, W., Greger, W.: Determining utility functions for streaming low bitrate football video. In: Ninth International Conference on Internet and Multimedia Systems and Applications (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wu, W., Arefin, A., Rivas, R., Nahrstedt, K., Sheppard, R., Yang, Z.: Quality of experience in distributed interactive multimedia environments: toward a theoretical framework. In: MM 2009: Proceedings of the Seventeen ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 481–490. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karan Mitra
    • 1
    • 2
  • Arkady Zaslavsky
    • 1
    • 2
  • Christer Åhlund
    • 2
  1. 1.Caulfield School of Information TechnologyMonash UniversityVictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Luleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations