Groups and Frequent Visitors Shaping the Space Dynamics

  • Karolina Baras
  • Adriano Moreira
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6869)

Abstract

Our research is about a dynamic symbolic space model that is fed with data from the environment by a set of processing modules that receive raw data from sensor networks. For the conducted experiments we have been using data from a WiFi network as it is a widely available infrastructure in our campus. Here we propose two processing modules which will provide more information about the spaces described in the model. The first one tries to implement our human perception of the usual visitors of a place using two measures, the long term and the short term tenant level. The second one detects where groups of users emerge, how many there are and what are their dimensions. Based on this new perspective of the campus we intend to realize how the presence of people shapes the dynamics of a space.

Keywords

groups of users space dynamics symbolic space model WiFi 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balachandran, A., Voelker, G.M., Bahl, P., Rangan, P.V.: Characterizing user behavior and network performance in a public wireless LAN. In: SIGMETRICS 2002: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Systems, pp. 195–205. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baras, K., Moreira, A.: Symbolic space modeling based on WiFi network data analysis. In: 2010 Seventh International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems, INSS (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henderson, T., Kotz, D., Abyzov, I.: The changing usage of a mature campus-wide wireless network. Computer Networks 52(14), 2690–2712 (2008)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim, M., Kotz, D.: Periodic properties of user mobility and access-point popularity. Personal Ubiquitous Computing 11(6), 465–479 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kjeldskov, J., Paay, J.: Public pervasive computing: Making the invisible visible. IEEE Computer 39(9), 60–65 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schwab, D., Bunt, R.: Characterising the use of a campus wireless network. In: Twenty-third Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies, INFOCOM 2004, vol. 2, pp. 862–870 (March 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sevtsuk, A., Huang, S., Calabrese, F., Ratti, C.: Mapping the MIT campus in real time using WiFi. In: Foth, M. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City, pp. 326–337. IGI Global, Hershey PA (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vaccari, A., Samouhos, S., Glicksman, L., Ratti, C.: MIT enernet: Correlating WiFi activity to human occupancy. In: Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2009, the 9th International Conference and Exhibition (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karolina Baras
    • 1
  • Adriano Moreira
    • 2
  1. 1.Exact Sciences and Engineering Competence CenterUniversity of MadeiraFunchalPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Information SystemsUniversity of MinhoGuimarãesPortugal

Personalised recommendations