Abstract
Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a recently described pathology in which an abnormal shape of the femoral head–neck junction and/or a retroverted acetabulum causes a pathological femoroacetabular contact, chiefly during hip flexion and internal rotation. Repetition of this abnormal contact provoked by impingement could constitute an important cause of osteoarthritis of the hip [1].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ganz R et al (2003) Femoroacetabular impingement: a cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop 417(417):112–120
Grigoris P et al (2005) The evolution of hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 36(2):125–134
Beaule PE, Antoniades J (2005) Patient selection and surgical technique for surface arthroplasty of the hip. Orthop Clin North Am 36(2):177–185
Treuting RJ et al (1997) Prohibitive failure rate of the total articular replacement arthroplasty at five to ten years. Am J Orthop 26(2):114–118
Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ (1998) Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J Orthop Sci 3:169–186
Trousdale RT et al (1995) Periacetabular and intertrochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77(1):73–85
Siebenrock KA et al (1999) Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop 363:9–20
Beck M et al (2004) Anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Part II. Midterm results of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop 418:67–73
Amstutz HC et al (2004) Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg 86A(1):28–39
Daniel J, Pynsent PB, McMinn DJW (2004) Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg 86B(2):177–184
Kishida Y et al (2004) Preservation of the bone mineral density of the femur after surface replacement of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86B(2):185–189
Mont MA et al (2006) Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14(8):454–463
Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Amstutz HC (2007) Early results of conversion of a failed femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):735–741
Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Campbell PA (2004) Fracture of the neck of the femur after surface arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 86A(9):1874–1877
Brodner W et al (2003) Serum cobalt levels after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 85A(11):2168–2173
Jacobs JJ et al (1996) Cobalt and chromium concentrations in patients with metal on metal total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 329S:S256–S263
Back DL et al (2005) Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87(3):324–329
Treacy R, Pynsent P (2005) Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg 87B(2):167–170
Campbell P et al (2006) The John Charnley Award: a study of implant failure in metal-on-metal surface arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 453:35–46
Little CP et al (2005) Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 87B(3):320–323
Beaule PE et al (2006) Vascularity of the arthritic femoral head and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88(Suppl 4):85–96
Lindstrand A et al (2000) The introduction period of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is critical: a clinical, clinical multicentered, and radiostereometric study of 251 Duracon unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15(5):608–616
Jones LC, Hungerford DS (1987) Cement disease. Clin Orthop 225:192–206
Beaule PE, Amstutz HC, Sinha RJ (2002) Surface arthroplasty of the hip revisited: current indications and surgical technique. In: Hip replacement: current trends and controversies. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 261–297
Beaule PE et al (2004) Risk factors affecting outcome of metal on metal surface arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop 418(418):87–93
Beaule PE et al (2004) Metal-on-metal surface arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component: a 7–10 year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 19(8 Suppl 3):17–22
Silva M et al (2004) The biomechanical results of total hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 86A(1):40–41
Beaule PE et al (2004) Orientation of femoral component in surface arthroplasty of the hip: a biomechanical and clinical analysis. J Bone Joint Surg 86A(9):2015–2021
Freeman MAR (1978) Some anatomical and mechanical considerations relevant to the surface replacement of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res 134:19–24
Amstutz HC, Markolf KL, Harris WH (1974) Design features in total hip replacement. In: Harris WH (ed) The hip society. CV Mosby, St. Louis, pp 111–124
Bartz RL et al (2000) The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint. J Bone Joint Surg 82(9):1300–1307
Beaule PE et al (2007) The femoral head/neck offset and hip resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(1):9–15
Kloen P, Leunig M, Ganz R (2002) Early lesions of the labrum and acetabular cartilage in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg 84B(1):66–69
Ito K et al (2001) Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. J Bone Joint Surg 83B(2):171–176
Beaule PE et al (2005) Three-dimensional computed tomography of the hip in the assessment of femoroacetabular impingement. J Orthop Res 23(6):1286–1292
Wiadrowski TP et al (1991) Peripheral wear of Wagner resurfacing hip arthroplasty acetabular components. J Arthroplasty 6(2):103–107
De Haan R et al (2008) Correlation between inclination of the acetabular component and metal ion levels in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90(10):1291–1297
Beaule PE, Poitras P (2007) Femoral component sizing and positioning in hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 56:163–169
Beaule PE (2004) A soft tissue sparing approach to surface arthroplasty of the hip. Oper Tech Orthop 14(4):16–18
Harty M (1982) Surface replacement arthroplasty of the hip. Anatomic considerations. Orthop Clin North Am 13(4):667–679
Loughead JM et al (2006) Removal of acetabular bone in resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip: a comparison with hybrid total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(1):31–34
Mardones RM et al (2005) Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(2):273–279
D’Lima DD et al (2000) The effect of the orientation of the acetabular and femoral components on the range of motion of the hip at different head-neck ratios. J Bone Joint Surg 82A(3):315–321
Scifert CF et al (1998) A finite element analysis of factors influencing total hip dislocation. Clin Orthop 355:152–162
Siguier T, Siguier M, Brumpt B (2004) Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 426:164–173
Tonnis D (1976) Normal values of the hip of the hip joint for the evaluation of x-rays in children and adults. Clin Orthop 119:39–47
Ganz R et al (2001) Surgical dislocation of the adult hip. A new technique with full access to the femoral head and acetabulum without the risk of avascular necrosis. J Bone Joint Surg 83B(8):1119–1124
Beaule PE et al (2009) The young adult with hip impingement: deciding on the optimal intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):210–221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Salineros, M.J., Beaulé, P.E. (2012). Resurfacing Arthroplasty for Femoroacetabular Impingement. In: Marín-Peña, Ó. (eds) Femoroacetabular Impingement. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22769-1_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22769-1_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22768-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22769-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)