Advertisement

Total Lumbar Disc Replacement

  • Christoph J. Siepe
Chapter

Abstract

Fusion of lumbar motion segments for the treatment of intractable low-back pain (LBP) has been associated with a variety of negative side effects. Perceived disadvantages such as accelerated adjacent level morbidities, iatrogenic superior segment facet joint violation, symptomatic complaints from facet, and sacroiliac joints or facet joint hypertrophy with consecutive narrowing of the spinal canal have previously been reported (Gillet, J Spinal Disord Tech 16:338–345, 2003; Goulet et al., Clin Orthop Relat Res:76–81, 1997; Kumar et al., Eur Spine J 10:309–313, 2001; Lee, Spine 13:375–377, 1988; Park et al., Spine 29:1938–1944, 2004; Umehara et al., Spine 25:1617–1624, 2000; Katz et al., J Spinal Disord Tech 16:96–99, 2003; Maigne and Planchon, Eur Spine J 14:654–658, 2005; Ha et al., Spine 33:1192–1198, 2008; Moshirfar et al., Spine 31:2624–2629, 2006; Shah et al., Spine 28:272–275, 2003; Cardoso et al., Spine 33:2868–2873, 2008). In an attempt to avoid these previously published and fusion-related negative side effects, a variety of new motion preserving technologies including total lumbar disc replacement procedures (TDR) have been introduced. This chapter outlines the technique of TDR with ProDisc II (Synthes, Paoli, PA).

Keywords

Disc Space Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene Retroperitoneal Approach Insertion Device Adjacent Vertebral Body 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Abbreviations

DDD

Degenerative disc disease

LBP

Low-back pain

PLL

Posterior longitudinal ligament

TDR

Total lumbar disc replacement

References

  1. 1.
    Gillet P (2003) The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:338–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goulet JA, Senunas LE, DeSilva GL et al (1997) Autogenous iliac crest bone graft. Complications and functional assessment. Clin Orthop Relat Res:76–81Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kumar MN, Jacquot F, Hall H (2001) Long-term follow-up of functional outcomes and radiographic changes at adjacent levels following lumbar spine fusion for degenerative disc disease. Eur Spine J 10:309–313PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lee CK (1988) Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion. Spine 13:375–377PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT et al (2004) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 29:1938–1944PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Umehara S, Zindrick MR, Patwardhan AG et al (2000) The biomecha­nical effect of postoperative hypolordosis in instrumented lumbar fusion on instrumented and adjacent spinal segments. Spine 25:1617–1624PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Katz V, Schofferman J, Reynolds J (2003) The sacroiliac joint: a potential cause of pain after lumbar fusion to the sacrum. J Spinal Disord Tech 16:96–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Maigne JY, Planchon CA (2005) Sacroiliac joint pain after lumbar fusion. A study with anesthetic blocks. Eur Spine J 14:654–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ha KY, Lee JS, Kim KW (2008) Degeneration of sacroiliac joint after instrumented lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: a prospective cohort study over five-year follow-up. Spine 33:1192–1198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Moshirfar A, Jenis LG, Spector LR et al (2006) Computed tomography evaluation of superior-segment facet-joint violation after pedicle instrumentation of the lumbar spine with a midline surgical approach. Spine 31:2624–2629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shah RR, Mohammed S, Saifuddin A et al (2003) Radiologic evaluation of adjacent superior segment facet joint violation following transpedicular instrumentation of the lumbar spine. Spine 28:272–275PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cardoso MJ, Dmitriev AE, Helgeson M et al (2008) Does superior-segment facet violation or laminectomy destabilize the adjacent level in lumbar transpedicular fixation? An in vitro human cadaveric assessment. Spine 33:2868–2873PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Wiechert K et al (2006) Clinical results of total lumbar disc replacement with ProDisc II: three-year results for different indications. Spine 31:1923–1932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Siepe CJ, Mayer HM, Heinz-Leisenheimer M et al (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement: different results for different levels. Spine 32:782–790PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McAfee PC, Cunningham BW, Hayes V et al (2006) Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. Spine 31:S152–S160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sariali el-H, Lemaire JP, Pascal-Mousselard H et al (2006) In vivo study of the kinematics in axial rotation of the lumbar spine after total intervertebral disc replacement: long-term results: a 10–14 years follow up evaluation. Eur Spine J 15:1501–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ching AC, Birkenmaier C, Hart RA (2010) Short segment coronal plane deformity after two-level lumbar total disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 35:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Huang RC, Lim MR, Girardi FP et al (2004) The prevalence of contraindications to total disc replacement in a cohort of lumbar surgical patients. Spine 29:2538–2541PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McAfee PC (2004) The indications for lumbar and cervical disc replacement. Spine J 4:177S–181SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wong DA, Annesser B, Birney T et al (2007) Incidence of contraindications to total disc arthroplasty: a retrospective review of 100 consecutive fusion patients with a specific analysis of facet arthrosis. Spine J 7:5–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chin KR (2007) Epidemiology of indications and contraindications to total disc replacement in an academic practice. Spine J 7:392–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blumenthal S, McAfee PC, Guyer RD et al (2005) A prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemptions study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: part I: ­evaluation of clinical outcomes. Spine 30:1565–1575; discussion E1387–E1591PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zigler J, Delamarter R, Spivak JM et al (2007) Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease. Spine 32:1155–1162; discussion 1163PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mayer HM, Wiechert K (2002) Microsurgical anterior approaches to the lumbar spine for interbody fusion and total disc replacement. Neurosurgery 51:S159–S165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mayer HM, Wiechert K, Korge A et al (2002) Minimally invasive total disc replacement: surgical technique and preliminary clinical results. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S124–S130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jasani V, Jaffray D (2002) The anatomy of the iliolumbar vein. A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1046–1049PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cakir B, Richter M, Kafer W et al (2005) The impact of total lumbar disc replacement on segmental and total lumbar lordosis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 20:357–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Liu J, Ebraheim NA, Haman SP et al (2006) Effect of the increase in the height of lumbar disc space on facet joint articulation area in sagittal plane. Spine 31:E198–E202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rohlmann A, Zander T, Bergmann G (2005) Effect of total disc replacement with ProDisc on intersegmental rotation of the lumbar spine. Spine 30:738–743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siepe CJ, Hitzl W, Meschede P et al (2009) Interdependence between disc space height, range of motion and clinical outcome in total lumbar disc replacement. Spine 34:904–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Adams MA, Roughley PJ (2006) What is intervertebral disc degeneration, and what causes it? Spine 31:2151–2161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Siepe CJ, Wiechert K, Khattab MF et al (2007) Total lumbar disc replacement in athletes: clinical results, return to sport and athletic performance. Eur Spine J 16:1001–1013PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Patel AA, Spiker WR, Daubs MD et al (2008) Retroperitoneal lymphocele after anterior spinal surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E648–E652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Flynn JC, Price CT (1984) Sexual complications of anterior fusion of the lumbar spine. Spine 9:489–492PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Datta JC, Janssen ME, Beckham R et al (2007) The use of computed tomography angiography to define the prevertebral vascular anatomy prior to anterior lumbar procedures. Spine 32:113–119PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Kropf MA et al (2008) Access strategies for revision in anterior lumbar surgery. Spine 33:1662–1667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Schön Klinik München Harlaching, Spine CenterMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations