Implantation of a Cervical Disc Prosthesis

  • Bernhard Bruns
  • Uwe Vieweg


Anterior cervical decompression and interbody fusion with an internal fixation device (ACDF – anterior cervical decompression and fusion) has, for some time, been the classic treatment for cervical spondylosis, but this technique could result in accelerated degeneration of the adjacent level. It was hypothesised that this degeneration could be prevented or at least decelerated by replacing the diseased disc with a prosthesis and thus preserving motion. Over the last decades, numerous disc prostheses designs have been developed and have been approved for specific indications. The evidence available to date indicates that they help to prevent or slowdown degeneration of the adjacent disc and segment. Disc replacement can restore the physiological curvature and range of motion of the cervical vertebrae to a greater extent than other forms of treatment. Implantation of a cervical disc prosthesis consists of two fundamental steps. The first is decompression of the neural structures, for which a conventional approach via the left or right blood vessel compartment is usually taken. The second step involves thorough preparation of the site followed by secure, central placement of the implant in the prepared space.


Cervical Spondylosis Disc Replacement Disc Prosthesis Artificial Disc Internal Fixation Device 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Anderson PA, Rouleau JP (2004) Intervertebral disc arthroplasty. Spine 29:2779–2786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson PA, Sasso RC, Rouleau JP et al (2004) The Bryan cervical disc: wear properties and early clinical results. Spine J 4:303S–309SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boden SD, Balderston RA, Heller JG et al (2004) An AOA critical issue. Disc replacements: this time will we really cure low-back and neck pain? J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:411–422PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang UK, Kim DH, Lee MC et al (2007) Changes in adjacent level disc pressure and facet joint force after cervical arthroplasty compared with cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 7:33–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DiAngelo DJ, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical aspects associated with cervical disk arthroplasty. In: Kim DH, Cammisa FP, Fessler RG (eds) Dynamic reconstruction of the spine. Thieme, New York/StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jaramllo-de La Torre J, Grauer JN, Yue JJ (2008) Update on cervical disc arthroplasty: where are we and where are we going? Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 1:124–130Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim SW, Shin JH, Arbatin JJ et al (2008) Effects of a cervical disc prosthesis on maintaining sagittal alignment of the functional spinal unit and overall sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Spine 17:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lafuente J, Casey AT, Perzold A et al (2005) The Bryan cervical disc prosthesis as an alternative to arthrodesis in the treatment of cervical spondylosis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:508–512PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leung C, Casey AT, Goffin J et al (2005) Clinical significance of heterotopic ossification in cervical disc replacement: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. Neurosurgery 57:759–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin EL, Wang JC (2006) Total disk arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 14:704–714Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mummaneni PV, Haid RW (2004) The future in the care of the cervical spine: interbody fusion and arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine 1:155–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nabhan A, Ahlhelm F, Shariat K et al (2007) The Pro-Disc C prosthesis: clinical and radiological experience 1 year after surgery. Spine 32:1935–1941PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sekhon LH (2004) Cervical arthroplasty in the management of spondylotic myelopathy: 18-month results. Neurosurg Focus 15:E8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of NeurosurgeryHospital MeiningenMeiningenGermany
  2. 2.Clinic for Spinal Surgery, Sana Hospital RummelsbergSchwarzenbruckGermany

Personalised recommendations