Advertisement

Electronic Payment Use and Legal Protection

  • Echo Huang
  • Fachang Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 194)

Abstract

This study examines why consumers accept and continue to use e-payment for online purchase, specifically, the relationship between their perceived benefits, legal protection, risk avoidance, and satisfaction with prior experiences. The analytical results presented in this study indicate that beliefs (benefits, legal protection and risk allocation) differentially affect e-payment use behavior. Notably, consumer beliefs and confirmation affect satisfaction with e-payment use and continuance intention. Finally the practical and theoretical implications of this study are discussed.

Keywords

e-Payment Use Perceived Risk Perceived Benefits Perceived Legal Protection Risks Allocation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Leclerc, F., Schmitt, B.H., Dube, L.: Waiting time and decision making: Is time like money? Journal of Consumer Research 22(1), 110–119 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Allen, H.: Innovations in retail payment: e-payments. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 43(3), 428–439 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Teo, T.S.H., Yeong, Y.D.: Assessing the consumer decision process in the digital marketplace. Omega 31, 349–363 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller, H.: Managing customer expectations. Information Systems Management 17(2), 92–95 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3), 319–342 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ajzen, I.: The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 50, 179–211 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion, of Innovation, 4th edn. Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhattacherjee, A.: An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance. Decision Support Systems 32, 201–214 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliver, R.L.: A cognitive model for the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research 17, 460–469 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., Chervany, N.L.: Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly 23, 183–213 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Javenpaa, S.L., Todd, P.A.: Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1(2), 59–88 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Furnell, S.M., Karweni, T.: Security implications of electronic commerce: a survey of consumers and businesses. Internet Research 9(5), 372–395 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Richmond, A.: Enticing online shoppers to buy- A human behavior study. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 28, 1469–1480 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beckwith, N.: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. The Oecd Observer 238, 28–31 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Collins, V.: Missouri Electric Cooperatives Employees Credit Union, WL 2189693, E.D.Mo (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lovett, V.: Heritage Bank 613 N.W.2d 652 (2000)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ting, L.Y.: The application of credit cards on internet transaction and related issues. Science & Technology Law Review 44(13), 58 (2001)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Baxter, T.C.: Problems and Gaps in the UCC Coverage of Payment Systems. SD30 ALI-ABA 73 (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ring, P.S., Van de Ven, A.H.: Developing processes of cooperative inter-organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review 19, 90–118 (1994)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pavlou, A.P.: Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. Information Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(3), 101–134 (2003)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Koyuncu, C., Bhattacharya, G.: The impacts of quickness, price, payment risk, and delivery issues on online shopping. Journal of Socio-Economics 33(2), 149–241 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hancock, D., Humphrey, D.B.: Payment transactions, instruments, and systems: A survey. Journal of Banking & Finance 21(11), 1573–1579 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Molesworth, M., Suortti, J.-P.: Buying cars online: The adoption of the Web for high-involvement, high-cost purchases. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 2(2), 155–169 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Plouffe, C.R., Hulland, J.S., Vandenbosch, M.: Research report: Richness versus parsimony in modeling technology adoption decisions – Understanding merchant adoption of a smart card-based payment system. Information Systems Research 12(2), 208–228 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lin, C.S., Wu, S., Tsai, R.J.: Integrating perceived playfulness into expectation-confirmation model for web portal context. Information & Management 42, 683–693 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stroborn, K., Heitmann, A., Leibold, K., Frank, G.: Internet payments in Germany: a classificatory framework and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Research 57, 1431–1437 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bensaou, M., Venkataman, N.: Inter-organizational relationships and information technology: A conceptual synthesis and a research framework. European Journal of Information Systems 5, 84–91 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    LaRose, R., Atkin, D.: Audiotext and the re-invention of the telephone as a mass medium. Journalism Quarterly 69(2), 413–421 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eastin, M.S.: Diffusion of e-commerce: an analysis of the adoption of four e-commerce activities. Telematics and Informatics 19, 251–267 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Malhotra, A.: E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research 7(3), 213–233 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zmud, R.W., Boynton, A.C.: Survey Measures And Instrument in MIS: Inventory and Appraisal. In: Kremer, K. (ed.) The Information Systems Research Challenge: Survey Research Methods, pp. 149–180. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anderson, E.W., Sullivan, M.W.: Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain. Journal of Service Research 3, 107–120 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bentler, P.M.: EQS Structural Equations Program Manual. BMDP Statistical Software (1989)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics. Journal of Marketing Research 18(3), 382–389 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shon, T.-H., Swatman, P.M.C.: Identifying effectiveness criteria for Internet payment systems. Internet Research 8(3), 202–217 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Riggins, F.J., Rhee, H.-S.: Toward a unified view of electronic commerce, Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM 41(10), 88–96 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Echo Huang
    • 1
  • Fachang Chen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementNational Kaohsiung First University of Sci. & Tech.Taiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Graduate Institute of Science and Technology LawNational Kaohsiung First University of Sci. & Tech.Taiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations