On the Degree of Team Cooperation in CD Grammar Systems

  • Fernando Arroyo
  • Juan Castellanos
  • Victor Mitrana
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6808)

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a dynamical complexity measure, namely the degree of team cooperation, in the aim of investigating “how much” the components of a grammar system cooperate when forming a team in the process of generating terminal words. We present several results which strongly suggest that this measure is trivial in the sense that the degree of team cooperation of any language is bounded by a constant. Finally, we prove that the degree of team cooperation of a given cooperating/distributed grammar system cannot be algorithmically computed and discuss a decision problem.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atanasiu, A., Mitrana, V.: The modular grammars. International Journal of Computer Math. 30, 17–35 (1989)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ter Beek, M.H.: Teams in grammar systems: hybridity, and weak rewriting. Acta Cybernetica 12, 427–444 (1996)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Csuhaj-Varjú, E., Dassow, J.: On cooperating distributed grammar systems. J. Inform. Process. Cybern. EIK 26, 49–63 (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Csuhaj-Varjú, E., Dassow, J., Kelemen, J., Păun, G.: Grammar Systems. Gordon and Breach (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Csuhaj-Varjú, E., Păun, G.: Limiting the size of teams in cooperating grammar systems. Bulletin EATCS 51, 198–202 (1993)MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dassow, J., Păun, G., Rozenberg, G.: Grammar Systems. In: [14]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kari, L., Mateescu, A., Păun, G., Salomaa, A.: Teams in cooperating grammar systems. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 7, 347–359 (1995)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meersman, R., Rozenberg, G.: Cooperating grammar systems. In: Winkowski, J. (ed.) MFCS 1978. LNCS, vol. 64, pp. 364–374. Springer, Heidelberg (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mateescu, A., Mitrana, V., Salomaa, A.: Dynamical teams in cooperating distributed grammar systems. Ann. Univ. of Bucharest, 3–14 (1993-1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nii, P.H.: Blackboard systems. In: Barr, A., Cohen, P.R., Feigenbaum, E.A. (eds.) The Handbook of AI, vol. 4. Addison-Wesley, London (1989)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Păun, G., Rozenberg, G.: Prescribed teams of grammars. Acta Informatica 31, 525–537 (1994)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Penttonen, M.: ET0L-grammars and N-grammars. Inform. Proc. Letters 4, 11–13 (1975)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rozenberg, G., Vermeir, D.: On the relationships between context-free programmed grammars and ET0L systems. Fundamenta Informaticae 1, 325–345 (1978)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.): Handbook of Formal Languages, vol. I-III. Springer, Berlin (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    von Solms, S.H.: On T0L languages over terminals. Inform. Proc. Letters 3, 69–70 (1975)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernando Arroyo
    • 1
  • Juan Castellanos
    • 2
  • Victor Mitrana
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Languages, Projects and Computer Information SystemsUniversity School of Informatics Polytechnic University of MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Department of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of InformaticsPolytechnic University of MadridMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of Organization and Structure of InformationUniversity School of Informatics Polytechnic University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations