Abstract
So far, we assumed that for setting up a new or improved electronic public service, actors from different government units would select or develop interoperable components of these particular services. We have called these cases “specific-service cases”. For these cases we could identify certain patterns in political and IT governance summarized in the previous chapter. But in our sample we also found infrastructure and portal cases. In these cases, actors wanted to create interoperability beyond an individual service. They wanted to develop a system that would provide several services or be used for several different services without necessarily knowing at the time of development what all those services would be at a future point in time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Charalabidis Y (ed) (2011) Interoperability in digital public services and administration. Bridging e-government and e-business. IGI, Hershey
EPAN (2004) European public administration network, e-government working group: key principles of an interoperability architecture. Brussels. http://www.epractice.eu/en/library/281244. Accessed 31 May 2011
Hjort-Madsen K, Pries-Heje J (2009) Enterprise architectures in government: fad or future? In: Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system science, IEEE
Janssen M, Snijders B, Herkemij F (2011) A reference architecture for interoperable and adaptive processes. In: Charalabidis Y (ed) Interoperability in digital public services and administration. IGI Global, Hershey, pp 162–179
Pardo TA, Burke GB (2008) Improving government interoperability: a capability framework for government managers. Center for Technology in Government, University of Albany, October 2008. http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/improving_government_interoperability/improving_government_interoperability.pdf. Accessed 01 June 2011
Pardo TA, Burke GB (2008) Government worth having: a briefing on interoperability for government leaders. Center for Technology in Government, University of Albany. http://www.ctg.albany.edu/publications/reports/government_worth_having/government_worth_having.pdf. Accessed 31 May 2011
Scholl HJ, Klischewski R (2007) E-government integration and interoperability: framing the research agenda. Int J Public Admin (IJPA) 30(8–9):889–920
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kubicek, H., Cimander, R., Scholl, H.J. (2011). Interoperability Beyond Interoperation. In: Organizational Interoperability in E-Government. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22502-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22502-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22501-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22502-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)