Advertisement

A Post-Naturalist Field Kit: Tools For The Embodied Exploration Of Social Ecologies

  • Sarah Kanouse
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

For nearly two hundred years, the figure of the naturalist—the enthusiastic observer of birds, soils, insects, plants, and animals—set the bar for dedicated, non-professional scholarship of the non-human world. With his sketchbook, butterfly net, binoculars, and field guides, the naturalist went “into the field” to learn nature’s secrets through patient observation. But recent scholarship in the sciences and humanities has revealed that “the field” cannot be considered apart from the human world that shapes and imagines it. Taking its cue from the study of social nature, A Post-Naturalist Field Kit is an art project that updates the figure of the naturalist for the exploration of post-natural urban landscapes. The project includes artifacts for exploring environmental issues in the city—from specimen jars to do-it-yourself air quality monitors and lead contamination tests—along with activity cards that refuse to draw lines between social, economic, and environmental issues. Drawing on Fluxus game kits and recent environmental art, “A Post-Naturalist Field Kit” offers tools for the embodied exploration of urban social ecologies. This article describes and contextualizes the project in light of relevant areas of creative practice and geographical thought.

Keywords

Social Nature Social Ecology Urban Pedagogy Metro Station Activity Card 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Badé, William Frederic. 1924. The Life and Letters of John Muir. Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  2. Bleecker, Julian and Dawn Lazzi. 2008. Drift Deck. http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.com/projects/drift-deck.
  3. Braun, Bruce and Noel Castree, eds. 1998. Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Castree, Noel and Bruce Braun, eds. 2001. Social Nature. Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Center for Urban Pedagogy. N.D. “Who We Are and What We Do.” http://www.anothercupdevelopment.org/about.
  6. Debord, Guy. 1958. “Theory of the Dérive.” http://www.bopsecrets.org/SI/2.derive.htm.
  7. Deluca, Kevin. 2007. “A Wilderness Environmentalism Manifesto: Contesting the Infinite Self-Absorbtion of Humans.” In R. Sandler and P. Pezzullo (eds) Environmental Justice and Environmentalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 27-55.Google Scholar
  8. Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Harvey, David. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Heynen, Nik, Maria Kaika, and Eric Swyngedouw. 2010. “Urban Political Ecology.” In N. Heynen, M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw (eds) In the Nature of Cities. London: Routledge, 1-19.Google Scholar
  11. Jacob, Mary Jane. 1993. Culture in Action. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
  12. Katz, Cindi. 1998. “Whose Nature? Whose Culture?” Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millenium. Bruce Braun and Noel Castree, eds. London: Routledge, 46-63.Google Scholar
  13. Kester, Grant. 2004. Conversation Pieces. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kwon, Miwon. 2002. One Place After Another. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Lacy, Suzanne. 1995. Mapping the Terrain. Seattle: Bay Press.Google Scholar
  16. Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Los Angeles Urban Rangers. 2006. Field Guide to the American Road Trip and Interstate Road Trip Specialist Field Kit. http://laurbanrangers.org/site/interstate
  19. Mitchell, W.J.T. 1994. Landscape and Power. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  20. Morton, Timothy. 2010. The Ecological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Riga, Andy. 2010. “New $3B Turcot to be built by 2018.” The Montreal Gazette. November 9. http://www.montrealgazette.com/news/Turcot+built+2018/3800058/story.html.
  22. Rogers, Heather. 2010. Green Gone Wrong. New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  23. Sandler, Ronald D. and Phaedra C. Pezzullo, eds. 2007 Environmental Justice and Environmentalism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, Neil. 2008. Uneven Development. Third Edition. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  25. Soper, Kate. 1995. What Is Nature? Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  26. Soulè, Michael E. and Gary Lease. 1995. Reinventing Nature?. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.Google Scholar
  27. Stilgoe, John. 1998. Outside Lies Magic. New York: Walker and Company.Google Scholar
  28. Whatmore, Sarah. 2002. Hybrid Geographies. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
  29. Williams, Raymond. 1983. Keywords. Second Edition. New York and London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah Kanouse
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Art and Art HistoryUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations