Skip to main content

A Modal Framework for Relating Belief and Signed Information

  • Conference paper
Book cover Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6814))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose a modal framework for reasoning about signed information. This modal framework allows agents to keep track of information source as long as they receive information in a multi-agent system. Agents gain that they can elaborate and justify their own current belief state by considering a reliability relation over the sources of information. The belief elaboration process is considered under two perspectives: (i) from a static point of view an agent aggregates received signed information according to its preferred sources in order to build its belief and (ii) from a dynamic point of view as an agent receives information it adapts its belief state about signed information. Splitting the notions of beliefs and signed statement is useful for handling the underlying trust issue: an agent believes some statement because it may justify the statement’s origin and its reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Aucher, G.: A combined system for update logic and belief revision. In: Barley, M.W., Kasabov, N. (eds.) PRIMA 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3371, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Garcia, L.: Handling locally stratified inconsistent knowledge bases. Studia Logica 70, 77–104 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Booth, R., Meyer, T.: How to revise a total preorder. Journal of Philosophical Logic 40(2), 193–238 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cholvy, L.: Automated reasoning with merged contradictory information whose reliability depends on topics. In: Froidevaux, C., Kohlas, J. (eds.) ECSQARU 1995. LNCS, vol. 946, pp. 125–132. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Cholvy, L.: A modal logic for reasoning with contradictory beliefs which takes into account the number and the reliability of the sources. In: Godo, L. (ed.) ECSQARU 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3571, pp. 390–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication. In: Cohen, P., Morgan, J., Pollack, M. (eds.) Intentions in Communication, pp. 221–256. MIT Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Communicative actions for artificial agents. In: Lesser, V., Gasser, L. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (ICMAS 1995), pp. 65–72. The MIT Press, San Francisco (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fariñas del Cerro, L., Herzig, A., Longin, D., Rifi, O.: Belief reconstruction in cooperative dialogues. In: Giunchiglia, F. (ed.) AIMSA 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1480, pp. 254–266. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dragoni, A., Giorgini, P.: Revising beliefs received from multiple sources. In: Frontiers of Belief Revision, Applied Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fagin, R., Halpern, J., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.: Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Fagin, R., Halpern, Y.M.J.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Finin, T., Labrou, Y., Mayfield, J.: KQML as an agent communication language. In: Bradshaw, J. (ed.) Software Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gärdenfors, P.: Knowledge in flux: Modeling the Dynamics of Epistemic States. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Gerbrandy, J., Groeneveld, W.: Reasoning about information change. J. of Logic, Language and Information 6(2) (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Herzig, A., Longin, D.: Belief dynamics in cooperative dialogues. J. of Semantics 17(2) (2000) (vol. published in 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.: Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial Intelligence 52(3), 263–294 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Konieczny, S., Pérez, R.: Propositional belief base merging or how to merge beliefs/goals coming from several sources and some links with social choice theory. European Journal of Operational Research 160(3), 785–802 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liau, C.: Belief, information acquisition, and trust in multi-agent systems–a modal logic formulation. Artificial Intelligence 149(1), 31–60 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Liberatore, P., Schaerf, M.: Arbitration (or how to merge knowledge bases). IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 10(1), 76–90 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lorini, E., Demolombe, R.: From Binary Trust to Graded Trust in Information Sources: A Logical Perspective. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Sabater-Mir, J., Singh, M.P. (eds.) Trust 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5396, pp. 205–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Nickles, M., Fischer, F., Weiss, G.: Communication attitudes: A formal approach to ostensible intentions, and individual and group opinions. In: Proc. of LCMAS 2005. Electronic Notes in Computer Science, vol. 157(4), pp. 95–115. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Perrussel, L., Thévenin, J.-M. (Dis)Belief Change Based on Messages Processing. In: Dix, J., Leite, J. (eds.) CLIMA IV. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3259, pp. 201–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Perrussel, L., Thévenin, J.: A logical approach for describing (dis)belief change and message processing. In: Proc. of AAMAS 2004, pp. 614–621. IEEE C.S, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Modeling rational agents within a bdi-architecture. In: Proc. of KR 1991, pp. 473–484 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Segerberg, K.: Belief revision from the point of view of doxastic logic. Logic Journal of IGPL 3(4), 535–553 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Towards a logic of rational agency. Journal of the IGPL 11(2), 133–157 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. van Ditmarsch, H.: Prolegomena to dynamic logic for belief revision. Synthese 147(2), 229–275 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, vol. 337. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lorini, E., Perrussel, L., Thévenin, JM. (2011). A Modal Framework for Relating Belief and Signed Information. In: Leite, J., Torroni, P., Ågotnes, T., Boella, G., van der Torre, L. (eds) Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6814. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22359-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22358-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22359-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics