Abstract
In gravity field modeling measurements are usually located on or above the terrain. However, when using the residual topographic modeling (RTM) method, measurements may end up inside the masses after adding the mean topography. These values do not correspond to values evaluated using a harmonic function. A so-called harmonic correction has been applied to gravity anomalies to solve this problem. However, for height anomalies no correction has been applied. To generalize the correction to e.g. height anomalies we interprete that the vertical gravity gradient inside the masses multiplied by height equals the correction. In principle the procedure is applicable to all gravity field functionals. We have tested this generalization of the procedure which consist in determining equivalent quantities in points Q on the mean surface if this surface is in free air. The procedure has as data the reduced values in P inside the masses but considered as being located at the mean surface. Numerical tests with height anomaly data from New Mexico and Norway as control data show that for gravity anomalies the general procedure is better than using the original harmonic correction procedure.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dahl O, Forsberg R (1999) Different ways to handle topography in practical geoid determination. Phys Chem Earth (A) 24(1):41–46
Elhabiby M, Sampietro D, Sanso F, Sideris M (2009) Bvp, global models and residual terrain correction. In: IAG symp, vol 113. Springer, Berlin, pp 211–217
Forsberg R (1984) A study of terrain reductions, density anomalies and geophysical inversion methods in gravity field modelling. Technical Report 355, Dept of Geodetic Science and Surveying, Ohio State University, Columbus
Forsberg R, Tscherning, CC (1981) The use of height data in gravity field approximation by collocation. J Geophys Res 86:7843–7854
Forsberg R, Tscherning CC (2008) An overview manual for the GRAVSOFT geodetic gravity field modelling programs, 2nd edn. DTU Space and University of Copenhagen
Lemoine F, Kenyon S, Factor J, Trimmer R, Pavlis N, Chinn D, Cox C, Klosko S, Luthcke S, Torrence M, Wang Y, Williamson R, Pavlis E, Rapp R, Olson T (1998) The development of the joint nasa gsfc and the national imagery and mapping agency (nima) geopotential model egm96. Technical Report NASA/TP-1998-206861, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt
Moritz H (1980) Advanced physical geodesy. Abacus, Turnbridge Wells Kent, Kent
Pavlis N, Holmes S, Kenyon S, Factor J (2008) An earth gravitational model to degree 2160: Egm2008. Presented at the 2008 General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, Vienna
Torge W (2001) Geodesy, 3 edn. De Gruyter, Berlin
Tscherning C (1974) A fortran iv program for the determination of the anomalous potential using stepwise least squares collocation. Technical Report 212, Department of Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University,Columbus
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the reviewers for their comments and suggestions on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Omang, O.C., Tscherning, C.C., Forsberg, R. (2012). Generalizing the Harmonic Reduction Procedure in Residual Topographic Modeling. In: Sneeuw, N., Novák, P., Crespi, M., Sansò, F. (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi Symposium on Mathematical Geodesy. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 137. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22078-4_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22078-4_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22077-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22078-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)