Abstract
Fine roots constitute an interface between plants and soils and thus play a crucial role in forest carbon, nutrient and water cycles. Their continuous growth and dieback, often termed turnover of fine roots, may constitute a major carbon input to soils and significantly contribute to belowground carbon cycle. For this reason, it is of importance to accurately estimate not only the standing biomass of fine roots, but also its rate of turnover. To date, no direct and reliable method of measuring fine root turnover exists. The main reason for this is that the two component processes of root turnover, namely growth and dieback of fine roots, nearly always happen in the same place and at the same time. Further, the estimation of fine root turnover is complicated by the inaccessibility of tree root systems, its labour intensiveness and is often compounded by artefacts created by soil disturbance. Despite the fact that the elucidation of the patterns and controls of forest fine root turnover is of utmost importance for the development of realistic carbon cycle models, our knowledge of the contribution of fine root turnover to carbon and nutrient cycles in forests remains uncertain. This chapter will detail all major methods currently used for estimating fine root turnover and highlight their advantages as well as drawbacks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brunner I, Godbold DL (2007) Tree roots in a changing world. J For Res 12:78–82
Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc B-Stat Methodol 34:187–220
Edwards NT, Harris WF (1977) Carbon cycling in a mixed deciduous forest floor. Ecology 58:431–437
Fahey TJ, Hughes JW (1994) Fine-root dynamics in a Northern Hardwood Forest Ecosystem, Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest, NH. J Ecol 82:533–548
Finer L, Helmisaari HS, Lohmus K et al (2007) Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Biosyst 141:394–405
Gaudinski JB, Trumbore SE, Davidson A et al (2001) The age of fine-root carbon in three forests of the eastern United States measured by radiocarbon. Oecologia 129:420–429
Gower ST, Vogel JG, Norman JM et al (1997) Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada. J Geophys Res-Atmos 102:29029–29041
Green IJ, Dawson LA, Proctor J et al (2005) Fine root dynamics in a tropical rain forest is influenced by rainfall. Plant Soil 276:23–32
Hendrick RL, Pregitzer KS (1996) Temporal and depth-related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests. J Ecol 84:167–176
Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Schulze ED (1997) A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7362–7366
Joslin JD, Wolfe MH (1999) Disturbances during minirhizotron installation can affect root observation data. Soil Sci Soc Am J 63:218–221
Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481
Lukac M, Calfapietra C, Godbold DL (2003) Production, turnover and mycorrhizal colonization of root systems of three Populus species grown under elevated CO2 (POPFACE). Glob Change Biol 9:838–848
Lukac M, Godbold DL (2010) Fine root biomass and turnover in southern taiga estimated by root inclusion nets. Plant Soil 331:505–513
Majdi H, Andersson P (2005) Fine root production and turnover in a Norway spruce stand in northern Sweden: effects of nitrogen and water manipulation. Ecosystems 8:191–199
Majdi H, Nylund JE, Agren GI (2007) Root respiration data and minirhizotron observations conflict with root turnover estimates from sequential soil coring. Scand J Forest Res 22:299–303
Nadelhoffer KJ, Raich JW (1992) Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73:1139–1147
Ostonen I, Lohmus K, Pajuste K (2005) Fine root biomass, production and its proportion of NPP in a fertile middle-aged Norway spruce forest: comparison of soil core and ingrowth core methods. For Ecol Manage 212:264–277
Ruess RW, VanCleve K, Yarie J et al (1996) Contributions of fine root production and turnover to the carbon and nitrogen cycling in taiga forests of the Alaskan interior. Can J Forest Res 26:1326–1336
Sala OE, Biondini ME, Lauenroth WK (1988) Bias in estimates of primary production - an analytical solution. Ecol Model 44:43–55
Steingrobe B, Schmid H, Claassen N (2000) The use of the ingrowth core method for measuring root production of arable crops – influence of soil conditions inside the ingrowth core on root growth. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:617–622
Tierney GL, Fahey TJ (2002) Fine root turnover in a northern hardwood forest: a direct comparison of the radiocarbon and minirhizotron methods. Can J Forest Res 32:1692–1697
Trumbore SE, Druffel ERM (1995) Carbon isotopes for characterizing sources and turnover of nonliving organic matter. In: Zepp RG, Sonntag CK (eds) Role of nonliving organic matter in the Earth’s Carbon Cycle. Wiley, Chichester
Trumbore SE, Da Costa ES, Nepstad DC et al (2006) Dynamics of fine root carbon in Amazonian tropical ecosystems and the contribution of roots to soil respiration. Glob Change Biol 12:217–229
Vogt K, Vogt DJ, Bloomfield J (1998) Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant Soil 200:71–89
Vogt KA, Persson H (1991) Measuring growth and development of roots. In: Lassoie JP, Hinckley TM (eds) Techniques and approaches in forest tree ecophysiology. CRC, Boca Raton, FL
Waisel Y, Eshel A, Kalkafi U (1991) Plant roots: the hidden half. Marcel Decker, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lukac, M. (2012). Fine Root Turnover. In: Mancuso, S. (eds) Measuring Roots. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22067-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22067-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22066-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22067-8
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)