Skip to main content

Driving Forces, Environmental Pressures and Policy Instruments

Sustainable Consumption Assessment for Latvia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Current unsustainable consumption patterns are one of the main sustainable development challenges, which have been recognised by many researchers, and are part of global, regional and national policies. Household consumption volumes and pressures on the environment in Latvia, although in most cases below EU average, have negative trends and tend to increase. The aim of this research was to investigate consumption trends in Latvia, the main driving forces behind household consumption (sustainable and unsustainable) patterns, to identify the main stakeholders and their roles and propose policy instruments and recommendations for sustainable consumption development in Latvia. The research methodology was based on desk research of statistical data and three different co-creation focus group interviews with representatives from NGOs and scientific communities working on sustainable consumption issues. The results show that the main driving forces depend on the individual’s internal factors such as personal values, knowledge, personal income as well as external factors: infrastructure, availability of information, prices and legislation. The main stakeholders responsible for sustainable consumption development are public (government) bodies, commercial enterprises, NGOs and households. The chapter concludes by outlining the main preconditions for sustainable development in Latvia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andins, J. (2009). Cycling development in Riga city. Riga: Riga City Council Traffic Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, A. (2011). Not roadmaps but toolboxes: Analysing pioneering national programmes for sustainable consumption and production. Journal of Consumer Policy, 34, 9–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brizga, J. (2008a). Ekoloģiskās pēdas nospiedums Latvijā. Pasaules dabas fonds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brizga, J. (2008b). Household environmentally sustainable behaviour and communication in Latvia. Proceedings: sustainable consumption 2008, Budapest, Hungary (p. 11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. (2007). Evolution of the global sustainable consumption and production policy and the United Nations Environment Programme’s (UNEP) supporting activities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15, 492–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Construction, Energy and Housing State Agency. (2008). Latvian energy in figures. Riga: CEHSA.

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (European Commission). (2008). Sustainable consumption and production and sustainable industrial policy action plan. Brussels, COM (2008)397/3. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/escp_en.htm

  • ETC SCP. (2010). Towards a set of indicators on sustainable consumption and production (SCP) for EEA reporting. European topic centre on sustainable consumption and production. Retrieved April 8, 2011, from http://scp.eionet.europa.eu/publications/SCP_Indicator_frame

  • Eurobarometer. (2011). Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment—365—EB75.2. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_365_pres_en.pdf

  • EEA (European Environment Agency). (1999). Environmental indicators: Typology and overview (p. 19). Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environment Agency). (2005). Household consumption and the environment. Retrieved June 6, 2010, from http://reports.eea.europa.eu/eea_report_2005_11/en

  • EEA (European Environment Agency). (2010). Municipal waste generation. Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/municipal-waste-generation-per-capita-in-western-europe-eu-15-new-member-states-eu-12-eu-countries-eu-27-and-total-in-europe-eu-27-turkey-croatia-norway-iceland-switzerland-3

  • Gatersleben, B., & Vlek, Ch. (1998). Household consumption, quality of life and environmental impacts: A psychological perspective and empirical study. In K. J. Noorman & A. J. M. Schoot-Uiterkamp (Eds.), Green households? Domestic consumers environment and sustainability (pp. 140–153). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich, E. G. (2005). Lifecycle approaches to sustainable consumption: A critical review. Environmental Science and Technology, 39(13), 4673–4684.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lähteenoja, S. et al. (2007). Natural resource consumption caused by Finnish households. Proceedings of the Nordic Consumer Policy Research Conference Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klāvs, G. (2010). Siltumnīcefekta gāzu emisijas un klimata politika to ierobežošanai transporta sektorā Latvijā; Fizikālās enerģētika institūts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kok, R., Benders, R. M. J., & Moll, H. C. (2006). Measuring the environmental load of household consumption using some methods based on input-output energy analysis: A comparison of methods and a discussion of results. Energy Policy, 34(17), 2744–2761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melece, L. (2007). Pārtikas un lauksaimniecības produktu bilance, patēriņš, tā struktūra un uzturvērtība Latvijā no 2003. līdz 2005. gadam un prognoze 2007. - 2013. gadam starptautisko saistību izpildei un uzraudzības programmu izstrādei, Rīga.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moll, S., & Watson, D. (2009). Environmental pressures from European consumption and production: A study in integrated environmental and economic analysis. Copenhagen: European Topic Centre of Sustainable Consumption and Production.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monier, et al. (2010). Final reportpreparatory study on food waste across EU 27. Bio Intelligence Service (p. 210). Retrieved April 22, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/bio_foodwaste_report.pdf

  • Nissinen, A., et al. (2006). Eco-benchmark’ for consumer-oriented LCA-based environmental information on products, services and consumption patterns. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(6), 538–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PVD. (2009). Latvijas nacionālais pārtikas patēriņa grozs, pārtikas un lauksaimniecības produktu balance, Pārtikas un Veterinārais dienests.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKDS. (2006). Public attitude towards environmental protection. Public Opinion Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • SKDS. (2008). Sustainable development value assessment. Public Opinion Survey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szlezak, J., Reichel, A., & Reisinger, H. (2008). National sustainable consumption and production (SCP) strategies in the EU: A comparative review of selected cases. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 45, 54–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukker, A. et al. (2006). Environmental impact of products (EIPRO): Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25. Retrieved April 8, 2011, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ipp/pdf/eipro_report.pdf

  • UK SCR. (2006). I will if you will: Towards sustainable consumption. Sustainable development commission and national consumer council. London, UK Sustainable Consumption Roundtable. Retrieved April 8, 2011, from www.sd-commission.org.uk

  • UN. (1992). Agenda 21. Retrieved April 8, 2011, from http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21/res_agenda21_00.shtml

  • UN. (2002). Johannesburg joint plan of implementation. Johannesburg: UN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unilever. (2009). Latvijas iedzīvotāji sākuši ēst lētāku un zemākas kvalitātes pārtiku. Retrieved April 8, 2011, from http://www.pareizs-uzturs.com/public/petijums-latvija-iedzivotaji-sakusi-est-letaku-un-zemakas-kvalitates-partiku.php

  • Wiedmann, T. M., Lenzen, K. T., & Barrett, J. (2007). Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities—part 2: Review of input-output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Ecological Economics, 61(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WWF. (2010). Living Planet Report 2010. Retrieved April 8, 2011, from http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/all_publications/living_planet_report/

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristīne Āboliņa, Sandris Mūriņš, Džineta Dimante, Dzintra Atstāja, Ivars Austers and Valdis Antons for their comments on an earlier version and for the discussion of the project background paper which shaped our ideas beyond that which is visible in the references.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jānis Brizga .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brizga, J., Līce, E. (2013). Driving Forces, Environmental Pressures and Policy Instruments. In: Schrader, U., Fricke, V., Doyle, D., Thoresen, V. (eds) Enabling Responsible Living. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22048-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics