Advertisement

A Feasibility Study of Learning Assessment Using Student’s Notes in An On-Line Learning Environment

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 167)

Abstract

The effectiveness and features of ”note-taking” are examined in an on-line learning environment. The relationships between the assessment of the contents of participants’ note taken during class, and the characteristics of students were studied. Some factors about personality and the learning experience are significant, and positively affect the grades given to their notes. Features of notes taken were extracted using a text analysis technique, and these features were compared with the grades given. The good note-takers constantly recorded the terms independently of the number of terms which was presented during the class. Conceptual mapping of the contents of notes was conducted, and it suggests that the deviation in the features of notes can be explained by the number of terms in a lesson.

Keywords

note-taking on-line learning learning activity learning evaluation text analytics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Deerwester, S., Dumais, S.T., Furnas, G.W., Landauer, T.K., Harshman, R.: Indexing by Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 41(6), 391–407 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fujii, Y.: Development of a Scale to Evaluate the Information Literacy Level of Young People –Comparison of Junior High School Students in Japan and Northern Europe. Japan Journal of Educational Technology 30(4), 387–395 (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldberg, L.R.: A Broad-Bandwidth, Public Domain, Personality Inventory Measuring the Lower-Level Facets of Several Five-Factor Models. In: Mervielde, I., Deary, I., De Fruyt, F., Ostendorf, F. (eds.) Personality Psychology in Europe, vol. 7, pp. 7–28. Tilburg University Press (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International Personality Item Pool, A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences, http://ipip.ori.org
  5. 5.
    Kiewra, K.A.: Students’ Note-Taking Behaviors and the Efficacy of Providing the Instructor’s Notes for Review. Contemporary Educational Psychology 10, 378–386 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kiewra, K.A.: A Review of Note-Taking: The Encoding-Storage Paradigm and Beyond. Educational Psychology Review 1(2), 147–172 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiewra, K.A., Benton, S.L., Kim, S., Risch, N., Christensen, M.: Effects of Note-Taking Format and Study Technique on Recall and Relational Performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology 20, 172–187 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R., Boire, M., Vagge, S.: Maximizing Constructivist Learning From Multimedia Communications by Minizimizing cogmitive load. Journal of Edcational Psychology 91(4), 638–643 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    MeCab: Yet Another Part-of-Speech and Morphological Analyzer, http://mecab.sourceforge.net
  10. 10.
    Nakayama, M., Yamamoto, H., Santiago, R.: Impact of Information Literacy and Learner Characteristics on Learning Behavior of Japanese Students in On line Courses. International Journal of Case Method Research & Application XX(4), 403–415 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nakayama, M., Yamamoto, H., Santiago, R.: The Impact of Learner Characteristics on Learning Performance in Hybrid Courses among Japanese Students. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning 5(3), 195–206 (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nakayama, M., Mutsuura, K., Yamamoto, H.: Effectiveness of Note Taking Activity in a Blended Learning Environment. In: 9th European Conference of E-Learning, pp. 387–393. Academic Publishing, Reading (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nye, P.A., Crooks, T.J., Powley, M., Tripp, G.: Student note-taking related to university examination performance. Higher Education 13, 85–97 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pilot, A., Olive, T., Kellogg, R.T.: Cognitive Effort during Note Taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology 19, 291–312 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Trafton, G.J., Trickett, S.B.: Note-Taking for Self-Explanation and Problem Solving. Human-Computer Interaction 16, 1–38 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tynajälä, P.: Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research 31, 357–442 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weener, P.: Note taking and student verbalization as instrumental learning activities. Instructional Science 3, 51–74 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Human System ScienceTokyo Institute of Technology, Ookayama, MeguroTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Graduate School of EngineeringShinshu UniversityAsahiJapan

Personalised recommendations