Abstract
Ambition is a good servant but a bad master. William Shakespeare often analysed the complications stemming from “sick ambition”, one of the greatest fears of the Elizabethan age. Interpretations of the Bard’s ideas are rooted in many sciences, but the sociology of literature still represents a new frontier to many literary scholars. It is my belief that Shakespearean ambition should be considered as a social phenomenon; as a process by which new territories are sought with a view to gaining access to new resources. This may involve either the expansion of certain roles or the complete transition of roles. Various role processes occur if social relations are further complicated by the involvement in dyadic interactions: strong role-based collaborative systems. This paper addresses the problem of two dyads where the driving force is ambition: Coriolanus and Volumnia in Coriolanus, and Macbeth and Lady Macbeth in Macbeth. The role of Coriolanus as a successful son is excessively fetishised by Volumnia, and, what is more, her inadequate definitions of roles force her son to transgress many of the boundaries set by his official roles. Macbeth’s and Lady Macbeth’s actions are an example of an unsuccessful role transition: they become excessively infatuated with the role of the king and follow this obsession into misrepresentation, and then the desire to maintain the front at all costs. This study has been influenced by Erving Goffman, as well as more recent developments in role theory. This viewpoint also considers power relations through the works of classics: new takes on the philosophies of Max Weber, Georg Simmel and Theodor Adorno.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adorno, T. and E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson and N. Sanford. 1950. The authoritarian personality. Studies in prejudice series, Volume 1. New York: Harper & Row.
Baker, W., E. Faulkner and R. R. Faulkner. 1991. Role as resource in the Hollywood film industry. The American journal of sociology, Vol. 97, No. 2, 279-309.
Biddle, B. J. 1986. Recent developments in role theory. Annual review of sociology 12:67-92.
Callero, P.L. 1994. From role playing to role-using: Understanding role as a resource. Social psychology quarterly 57(3), 228-243.
DeLamater, J. D. ed. 2006. Handbook of social psychology. New York: Springer Science and Business Media.
Goffman, E. 1990 [1959]. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Penguin Books.
Harris, E. E. 1966. Some comparisons among negro-white students: social ambition and estimated social mobility. Journal of Negro education Vol. 35, No. 4, 351-368.
Horton, P. B., C. L. Hunt. 1980. Sociology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Łoś, M. 1985. Role społeczne w nowej roli [The new roles of social roles]. 1985. In: O społeczeństwie i teorii społecznej. Księga poświęcona pamięci Stanisława Ossowskiego [On society and social theory. A book in the memory of Stanisław Ossowski], eds. E. Mokrzycki, M. Ofierska and J. Szacki, 123-144. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Rosen, W. 1960. Shakespeare and the craft of tragedy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Scott, J. 2006. Władza. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sic!
Shakespeare, W. 1983. Macbeth. (Edited by Bernard Lott. New Swan Shakespeare edition). London: Longman.
Shakespeare, W. 1993. Coriolanus. (The Illustrated Stratford Shakespeare). London: Chancellor Press.
Simmel, G. 1975. Socjologia. (translated by Małgorzata Łukasiewicz.) Warszawa: PWN.
Szacka, B. 2003. Wprowadzenie do socjologii [Introduction to sociology]. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Szmatka, J. 2007. Małe struktury społeczne [Small social structures]. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Theodorson, G. A. and A. G. Theodorson.1969. A modern dictionary of sociology. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
Turner, J. H. 1994. Socjologia: koncepcje i ich zastosowanie. (Translated by Ewa Różalska.) Poznań: Zysk i Spółka.
Turowski, J. 2001. Socjologia. Małe struktury społeczne [Sociology. Small social structures]. Lublin: Towarzystwo Naukowe Katolickiego Uniwersytetu Lubelskiego.
Weber, M. 2006. Typy panowania. In Socjologia. Lektury [Sociology. Collected excerpts], eds. P. Sztompka and M. Kucia, 470-492. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Znak.
Zbierski, H. 1988. William Shakespeare. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brzozowska, N. (2013). The Idea of Ambition as a Social Process Based on Role Transition Theory: Dyadic Power Relations in Coriolanus and Macbeth . In: Fabiszak, J., Urbaniak-Rybicka, E., Wolski, B. (eds) Crossroads in Literature and Culture. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21994-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21994-8_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21993-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21994-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)