Sustainable Development of Air Transport



Broadly speaking, the phrase “sustainable development” means development that caters to the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of the future generation to achieve their needs. Usually, this phrase is used in an environmental sense. However, it could also mean – as in the context of this chapter-development that ensures the sustainability of an industry. The initial and fundamental premise of the air transport industry is that the air transport sector has never been continuously profitable and that the industry’s profitability has been cyclical. Competition in air transport has been a key factor along with the perceived anomalies that are not seen in other transport modes, such as sovereignty which is a key issue in the award of air traffic rights and the requirement that ownership and control of an airline should be in the hands of nationals of a country I which an airline is registered on a majority basis. All of these factors lead to air transport being subject to the Game Theory, which is a branch of applied mathematics that is used in conformity with economic principles. The Game Theory suggests that strategic interactions among economic agents (air carriers) result in outcomes with respect to their preferences. The success of their choices depends on choices made by others. Apart from air transport economics, the Game theory applies to other areas such as security and environmental protection.


  1. Abeyratne RIR (1995) Legal and regulatory issues of computer reservations systems and code sharing agreements in air transport. Editiones Frontieres, p 119Google Scholar
  2. Abeyratne RIR (2003) The decision of the European court of justice on open skies – how can we take liberalization to the next level? J Air Law Commerce 68(3):485–518Google Scholar
  3. Abeyratne RIR (2004) The decision in the Ryanair case – the low cost carrier phenomenon. Eur Transport Law XXXIX(5):585–601Google Scholar
  4. Abeyratne RIR (2005) The airbus-boeing subsidies dispute – some preliminary legal issues. Air Space Law XXX(6):379–395Google Scholar
  5. Abeyratne RIR (2009) Airport business law. PublishAmerica, Bloomington, IN, p 13Google Scholar
  6. Adkins B (1994) Air transport and E.C. competition law. European Competition Law Monologues. Sweet and Maxwell, London, p 81Google Scholar
  7. Altman R (2009) Landmark synthetic jet fuel specification action creates opportunities for airports. Int Airport Rev 4:62–64Google Scholar
  8. Arpino R (1994) Automated weather observation systems find increasing acceptance at major airports. ICAO J:15Google Scholar
  9. Baker C (2005) Back to the table. Airline Business:36 at 38Google Scholar
  10. Becker P (2002) Corporate foresight in Europe: a first overview. Institute of Science and Technology Studies, Germany, p 7Google Scholar
  11. Bobbitt P (2008) Terror and consent: the wars for the twenty first century. Knopf, New York, pp 98–179Google Scholar
  12. Brunelle-Yeung E (2009) The impacts of aviation emissions on human health through changes in air quality and UV irradiance. Thesis, Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  13. Caldecott B, Tooze S (2009) Green skies thinking: promoting the development and commercialization of sustainable bio-jet fuels, Policy Exchange, research noteGoogle Scholar
  14. Daggett DL, Hendricks RC, Walther R, Corporan E (2007) Alternate fuels for use in commercial aircraft. The Boeing Company, published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. ISABE-2007-1196Google Scholar
  15. Doganis R (2001) (2001) The airline business in the 21st century. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. Doz Y, Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) Control, change and flexibility: the dilemma of transnational collaboration. In: Bartlett C, Doz Y, Hedlund G (eds) Managing the global firm. Routledge, London, pp 17–143 at 33Google Scholar
  17. Ferguson N (2008) The ascent of money. The Penguin Press, New York, p 188Google Scholar
  18. Field D (2005) True open skies? Airline Business:8Google Scholar
  19. Flanagan M (1996) Open skies and the survival of the fittest. Aerospace:16 at p 18Google Scholar
  20. Frank Carlson E (1995) Brrrr! Airplanes operating at extremely low ground temperatures. Airliner:9Google Scholar
  21. Freedman JE (1994) Applicability of E-scan technology for future airport aviation weather radars. Air Traffic Control Quarterly 2(1):53–78Google Scholar
  22. Goh J (1997) European air transport law and competition. Wiley, New York, p 15Google Scholar
  23. Janda R (1995) Passing the torch: why ICAO should leave economic regulation of international air transport to the WTO. Ann Air Space Law XX(Part 1):409–430, at 430Google Scholar
  24. Kimpel S (1997) Antitrust considerations in international airline alliances. J Air Law Commerce 63:475–513 at 476Google Scholar
  25. Levine ME (2009) Airport congestion: when theory meets reality. Law and economics research paper series, working paper no. 08-55. Yale J Regulation 26(1):37 at 76–87Google Scholar
  26. Manningham D (1996) The keys to using weather radar. Business Commercial Aviation:60–62Google Scholar
  27. McKenna JT (1994) Airlines seek uniform winter safety rules. Aviation Week Space Technol:46–47Google Scholar
  28. Miyagi M (2005) Serious accidents and human factors. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Virginia, p 143Google Scholar
  29. Morrison S, Winston C (1986) The economic effects of domestic deregulation, pp 1–2Google Scholar
  30. Puempol H (2006) Airports and aviation weather services: a new alliance forming? Int Airport Rev (4):75 at 76Google Scholar
  31. Reuter P (1989) Introduction to the law of treaties. Pinter Publishers, London and New York, p 16Google Scholar
  32. Rhoades DL, Lush H (1997) A typology of strategic alliances in the airline industry: propositions for stability and duration. J Air Transport Manage 3(3):109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Roos HB, Sneek NW (1997) Some remarks on predatory pricing and monopolistic competition in air transport. Air Space Law XXII(3):154Google Scholar
  34. Rusmussen R, Cole J, Knight K, Moore RK, Kupperman M (1995–1996) How heavy is that snowfall. Flight Deck 18:24–26 at 24Google Scholar
  35. Stadlmeier S (1997) International commercial aviation: from foreign policy to trade in services. In: Benko M, de Graaf W (eds) Forum for air and space law, vol 3. Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, Editions Frontieres, France, p 318Google Scholar
  36. Steinhorst G, van Dijk WCM (1994) Modern weather observation systems in use at airports can improve the quality of weather data. ICAO J 49(8):12–14, at 13Google Scholar
  37. Stuart RA, Isaac GA (1994) Archived weather data provides new information on ground based icing. ICAO J:5Google Scholar
  38. Supiot A (2010) A legal perspective on the economic crisis of 2008. Int Labour Rev 149(2):151–162, at 152Google Scholar
  39. Taylor WF (2009) Survey of sulphur levels in commercial jet fuel. CRC Aviation Research Committee of the Coordinating Research Council, Alpharetta, GAGoogle Scholar
  40. Wagner GA (1994–1995) Take-off and landing on icy conditions. Flight Deck 14:21–25Google Scholar
  41. Walther R et al (1995) Aero engines for alternative fuels, in hydrogen and other alternative fuels for air and ground transportation. European Commission, Brussels, published by WileyGoogle Scholar
  42. Wassenbergh H (2000) Common market, open skies and politics. Air Space Law XXV(4–5):174 at 176Google Scholar
  43. Wassenbergh H (2001) Towards global economic regulation of international air transportation through interregional bilateralism. Ann Air Space Law XXVI:237 at p. 243Google Scholar
  44. Woolley D (1999) Winter operations evolve in Europe. GSE Today:23–26Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO)MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations