Assessment of Learners’ Attention While Overcoming Errors and Obstacles: An Empirical Study

  • Lotfi Derbali
  • Pierre Chalfoun
  • Claude Frasson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6738)

Abstract

This study investigated learners’ attention during interaction with a serious game. We used Keller’s ARCS theoretical model and physiological sensors (heart rate, skin conductance, and electroencephalogram) to record learners’ reactions throughout the game. This paper focused on assessing learners’ attention in situations relevant to learning, namely overcoming errors and obstacles. Statistical analysis has been used for the investigation of relationships between theoretical and empirical variables. Results from non-parametric tests and linear regression supported the hypothesis that physiological patterns and their evolution are suitable tools to directly and reliably assess learners’ attention. Intelligent learning systems can greatly benefit from using these results to enhance and adapt their interventions.

Keywords

Learners’ attention assessment serious game physiological sensors EEG regression model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Garris, R., Ahlers, R., Driskell, J.E.: Games, motivation, and learning: a research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming 33, 441–467 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Prensky, M.: Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw Hill, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnson, W.L., Wu, S.: Assessing aptitude for learning with a serious game for foreign language and culture. In: Woolf, B.P., Aïmeur, E., Nkambou, R., Lajoie, S. (eds.) ITS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5091, pp. 520–529. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amory, A., Naicker, K., VIncent, J., Adams, C.: The use of computer games as an educational tool: identification of appropriate game types and game elements. British Journal of Educational Technology 30, 311–321 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dondlinger, M.J.: Educational video game design: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Educational Technology 4, 21–31 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Derbali, L., Frasson, C.: Prediction of Players Motivational States Using Electrophysiological Measures during Serious Game Play. In: IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Sousse, Tunisia, pp. 498–502 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gunter, G.A., Kenny, R.F., Vick, E.H.: A case for a formal design paradigm for serious games. International Digital Media & Arts Association 3, 93–105 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Conati, C.: Probabilistic Assessment of User’s Emotions in Educational Games. Applied Artificial Intelligence 16, 555–575 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arroyo, I., Cooper, D.G., Burleson, W., Woolf, B.P., Muldner, K., Christopherson, R.: Emotion Sensors Go To School. In: International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Brighton, UK, pp. 17–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qu, L., Wang, N., Johnson, W.L.: Using Learner Focus of Attention to Detect Learner Motivation Factors. User Modeling, 70–73 (2005)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuo-An, H., Chia-Hao, Y.: Attentiveness Assessment in Learning Based on Fuzzy Logic Analysis. Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, 142–146 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Peters, C., Asteriadis, S., Rebolledo-mendez, G.: Modelling user attention for human-agent interaction. In: 10th Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, pp. 266–269 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hudlicka, E.: Affective game engines: motivation and requirements. In: 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, Orlando, Florida, pp. 299–306 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rebolledo-Mendez, G., de Freitas, S., Rojano-Caceres, R., Gaona-Garcia, A.R.: An empirical examination of the relation between attention and motivation in computer-based education: A modeling approach. In: International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Florida, USA, pp. 74–79 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Freitas, S.d., Oliver, M.: How can exploratory learning with games and simulations within the curriculum be most effectively evaluated? Computers & Education 46, 249–264 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McNamara, D.S., Jackson, G.T., Graesser, A.C.: Intelligent tutoring and games (iTaG). In: Workshop on Intelligent Educational Games at the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 1–10. IOS Press, Brighton (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keller, J.M.: Development and use of the ARCS model of motivational design. Instructional Development 10, 2–10 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Keller, J.M.: Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Springer, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lin, T., Imamiya, A., Hu, W., Omata, M.: Display Characteristics Affect Users’ Emotional Arousal in 3D Games. Universal Access in Ambient Intelligence Environments, 337–351 (2007)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wilson, G.F., Fisher, F.: Cognitive task classification based upon topographic EEG data. Biological Psychology 40, 239–250 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Putman, P., van Peer, J., Maimari, I., van der Werff, S.: EEG theta/beta ratio in relation to fear-modulated response-inhibition, attentional control, and affective traits. Biological Psychology 83, 73–78 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Demos, J.N.: Getting started with neurofeedback. Norton & Compagny, New York (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lotfi Derbali
    • 1
  • Pierre Chalfoun
    • 1
  • Claude Frasson
    • 1
  1. 1.Département d’informatique et de recherche opérationnelleUniversité de MontréalMontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations