Skip to main content

An Algorithm for Direct Construction of Complete Merged Processes

  • Conference paper
Applications and Theory of Petri Nets (PETRI NETS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6709))

Abstract

Merged process is a recently proposed condense representation of a Petri net’s behaviour similar to a branching process (unfolding), which copes well not only with concurrency, but also with other sources of state space explosion like sequences of choices. They are by orders of magnitude more condense than traditional unfoldings, and yet can be used for efficient model checking.

However, constructing complete merged processes is difficult, and the only known algorithm is based on building a (potentially much larger) complete unfolding prefix of a Petri net, whose nodes are then merged. Obviously, this significantly reduces their appeal as a representation that can be used for practical model checking.

In this paper we develop an algorithm that avoids constructing the intermediate unfolding prefix, and builds a complete merged process directly. In particular, a challenging problem of truncating a merged process is solved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldan, P., Corradini, A., König, B., Schwoon, S.: McMillan’s complete prefix for contextual nets. In: Jensen, K., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Billington, J. (eds.) Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency I. LNCS, vol. 5100, pp. 199–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Chatain, T., Jard, C.: Symbolic diagnosis of partially observable concurrent systems. In: de Frutos-Escrig, D., NĂºĂ±ez, M. (eds.) FORTE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3235, pp. 326–342. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chatain, T., Jard, C.: Complete finite prefixes of symbolic unfoldings of safe time Petri nets. In: Donatelli, S., Thiagarajan, P.S. (eds.) ICATPN 2006. LNCS, vol. 4024, pp. 125–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Corbett, J.C.: Evaluating deadlock detection methods for concurrent software. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 22, 161–180 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible SAT-solver. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, pp. 333–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Engelfriet, J.: Branching processes of Petri nets. Acta Inf. 28, 575–591 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Esparza, J.: Decidability and Complexity of Petri Net Problems — an Introduction. In: Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) APN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1491, pp. 374–428. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Esparza, J., Heljanko, K.: Unfoldings – A Partial-Order Approach to Model Checking. EATCS Monographs in Theoretical Computer Science. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Esparza, J., Römer, S., Vogler, W.: An improvement of McMillan’s unfolding algorithm. FMSD 20(3), 285–310 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Heljanko, K.: Minimizing finite complete prefixes. In: Proc. CS&P 1999, pp. 83–95 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heljanko, K.: Using logic programs with stable model semantics to solve deadlock and reachability problems for 1-safe Petri nets. Fund. Inf. 37, 247–268 (1999)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Khomenko, V.: Model Checking Based on Prefixes of Petri Net Unfoldings. Ph.D. thesis, School of Comp. Sci., Newcastle Univ. (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Khomenko, V., Kondratyev, A., Koutny, M., Vogler, W.: Merged processes — a new condensed representation of Petri net behaviour. Acta Inf. 43(5), 307–330 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Khomenko, V., Koutny, M., Vogler, V.: Canonical prefixes of Petri net unfoldings. Acta Inf. 40(2), 95–118 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Khomenko, V., Mokhov, A.: An algorithm for direct construction of complete merged processes. Tech. Rep. CS-TR-1231, School of Comp. Sci., Newcastle Univ. (2011), http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/publications/trs/papers/1231.pdf

  16. McMillan, K.: Symbolic Model Checking: an Approach to the State Explosion Problem. Ph.D. thesis, School of Comp. Sci., Carnegie Mellon Univ. (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. McMillan, K.L.: Using unfoldings to avoid state explosion problem in the verification of asynchronous circuits. In: Probst, D.K., von Bochmann, G. (eds.) CAV 1992. LNCS, vol. 663, pp. 164–174. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Melzer, S., Römer, S.: Deadlock checking using net unfoldings. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) CAV 1997. LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 352–363. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. MINISAT tool home page, http://minisat.se

  20. Moskewicz, S., Madigan, C., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an efficient SAT solver. In: Proc. DAC 2001, pp. 530–535. ASME Technical Publishing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murata, T.: Petri nets: Properties, analysis and applications. Proc. of the IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. PUNF home page, http://homepages.cs.ncl.ac.uk/victor.khomenko/tools/punf

  23. Ranjan, D., Tang, D., Malik, S.: A comparative study of 2QBF algorithms. In: SAT 2004, ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stockmeyer, L.J.: The polynomial-time hierarchy. Theor. Comp. Sci. 3(1), 1–22 (1976)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Valmari, A.: The State Explosion Problem. In: Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) APN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1491, pp. 429–528. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Vogler, W., Semenov, A., Yakovlev, A.: Unfolding and finite prefix for nets with read arcs. In: Sangiorgi, D., de Simone, R. (eds.) CONCUR 1998. LNCS, vol. 1466, pp. 501–516. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, L., Malik, S.: The quest for efficient Boolean satisfiability solvers. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, pp. 582–595. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Khomenko, V., Mokhov, A. (2011). An Algorithm for Direct Construction of Complete Merged Processes. In: Kristensen, L.M., Petrucci, L. (eds) Applications and Theory of Petri Nets. PETRI NETS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6709. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21834-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21834-7_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21833-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21834-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics