Comparison of Artificial Neural Networks and Dynamic Principal Component Analysis for Fault Diagnosis
- 1 Citations
- 975 Downloads
Abstract
Dynamic Principal Component Analysis (DPCA) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) are compared in the fault diagnosis task. Both approaches are process history based methods, which do not assume any form of model structure, and rely only on process historical data. Faults in sensors and actuators are implemented to compare the online performance of both approaches in terms of quick detection, isolability capacity and multiple faults identifiability. An industrial heat exchanger was the experimental test-bed system. Multiple faults in sensors can be isolated using an individual control chart generated by the principal components; the error of classification was 15.28% while ANN presented 4.34%. For faults in actuators, ANN showed instantaneous detection and 14.7% lower error classification. However, DPCA required a minor computational effort in the training step.
Keywords
DPCA Artificial Neural Network Fault Detection Fault DiagnosisPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Venkatasubramanian, V., Rengaswamy, R., Kavuri, S., Yin, K.: A Review of Process Fault Detection and Diagnosis Part I Quantitative Model-Based Methods. Computers and Chemical Eng. 27, 293–311 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Habbi, H., Kinnaert, M., Zelmat, M.: A Complete Procedure for Leak Detection and Diagnosis in a Complex Heat Exchanger using Data-Driven Fuzzy Models. ISA Trans. 48, 354–361 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Astorga-Zaragoza, C.M., Alvarado-Martínez, V.M., Zavala-Río, A., Méndez-Ocaña, R., Guerrero-Ramírez, G.V.: Observer-based Monitoring of Heat Exchangers. ISA Trans. 47, 15–24 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Morales-Menendez, R., Freitas, N.D., Poole, D.: State Estimation and Control of Industrial Processes using Particles Filters. In: IFAC-ACC 2003, Denver Colorado U.S.A, pp. 579–584 (2003)Google Scholar
- 5.Tan, C.K., Ward, J., Wilcox, S.J., Payne, R.: Artificial Neural Network Modelling of the Thermal Performance of a Compact Heat Exchanger. Applied Thermal Eng. 29, 3609–3617 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Rangaswamy, R., Venkatasubramanian, V.: A Fast Training Neural Network and its Updation for Incipient Fault Detection and Diagnosis. Computers and Chemical Eng. 24, 431–437 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Perera, A., Papamichail, N., Bârsan, N., Weimar, U., Marco, S.: On-line Novelty Detection by Recursive Dynamic Principal Component Analysis and Gas Sensor Arrays under Drift Conditions. IEEE Sensors J. 6(3), 770–783 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Mina, J., Verde, C.: Fault Detection for MIMO Systems Integrating Multivariate Statistical Analysis and Identification Methods. In: IFAC-ACC 2007, New York U.S.A, pp. 3234–3239 (2007)Google Scholar
- 9.Detroja, K., Gudi, R., Patwardhan, S.: Plant Wide Detection and Diagnosis using Correspondance Analysis. Control Eng. Practice 15(12), 1468–1483 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Tudón-Martínez, J.C., Morales-Menendez, R., Garza-Castañón, L.: Fault Diagnosis in a Heat Exchanger using Process History based-Methods. In: ESCAPE 2010, Italy, pp. 169–174 (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Peña, D.: Análisis de Datos Multivariantes. McGrawHill, España (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Tudón-Martínez, J.C., Morales-Menendez, R., Garza-Castañón, L.: Fault Detection and Diagnosis in a Heat Exchanger. In: 6th ICINCO 2009, Milan Italy, pp. 265–270 (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Hotelling, H.: Analysis of a Complex of Statistical Variables into Principal Components. J. Educ. Psychol. 24 (1993)Google Scholar
- 14.Freeman, J.A., Skapura, D.M.: Neural Networks: Algorithms, Applications and Programming Techniques. Adisson-Wesley, Reading (1991)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 15.Korbicz, J., Koscielny, J.M., Kowalczuk, Z., Cholewa, W.: Fault Diagnosis Models, Artificial Intelligence, Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 16.Woods, K., Bowyer, K.W.: Generating ROC Curves for Artificial Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. on Medical Imaging 16(3), 329–337 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar