Advertisement

Abstract

Reducing the Cost of a Business Process is a challenge faced by organizations. Business Process researchers have recommended a host of best practices for Business Process design which leads to Cost effectiveness. However, these are theoretical and there is no real guideline for either implementation or the Cost reduction acheived by the implementation of these best practices. In this paper, we evaluate the most commonly recommended best practices available in literature for Cost reduction for their effectiveness. We implement a pattern based Cost calculation methodology which shows the impact of best practices on examples in a measurable way. Using this methodology we calculate the overall Cost, reliability and the Cost incurred to achieve one successful execution of the Business Process; the Business Cost of the process.

Keywords

Business Process Cost Best Practices 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sampath, W.: Computing the Cost of Business Processes. In: Third International United Information Systems Conference, Sydney, Australia, vol. 12(2), p. 20 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klein, M.: 10 principles of reengineering. Executive Excellence 12(2), 20 (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manganelli, R., Klein, M.: The reengineering handbook:a step-by-step guide to business transformation. American Management Association, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P., Berens, P.J.S.: Beyond workflow management:product-driven case handling. In: Ellis, S., et al. (eds.) International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP 2001), pp. 42–51. ACM Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Workflow verification: Finding control-flow errors using petri-net-based techniques. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., Desel, J., Oberweis, A. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 1806, pp. 161–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reijers, H.A., Limam, S., Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Product-based workflow design. Journal of Management Information Systems 20(1), 229–262 (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Reengineering knock-out processes. Decision Support Systems 30(4), 451–468 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Castano, S., de Antonellis, V., Melchiori, M.: A methodology and tool environment for process analysis and reengineering. Data and Knowledge Engineering 31, 253–278 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hammer, M., Champy, J.: Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution. Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rupp, R.O., Russell, J.R.: The golden rules of process redesign. Quality Progress 27(12), 85–92 (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peppard, J., Rowland, P.: The essence of business process reengineering. Prentice-Hall Editions, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Berg, A., Pottjewijd, P.: Workflow:continuous improvement by integral process management. Academic Service, Schoonhoven (1997) (in Dutch)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clark, A., Gilmore, S.: Evaluating Quality of Service for Service Level Agreements (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fourneau, J.-M., Kloul, L.: A Precedence PEPA Model for Performance and Reliability AnalysisGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bradley, J.T., Dingle, N., Gilmore, S.T., Knottenbelt, W.J.: Extracting Passage Time form PEPA models with the Hydra tool: a case study. In: UKPEW 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hillston, J., Kloul, L.: An efficient kronecker representation for PEPA models. In: de Luca, L., Gilmore, S. (eds.) PROBMIV 2001, PAPM-PROBMIV 2001, and PAPM 2001. LNCS, vol. 2165, p. 120. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bravetti, M., Gilmore, S., Guidi, C., Tribastone, M.: Replicating Web Services for Scalability (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Partha Sampath
    • 1
  • Martin Wirsing
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceLudwig-Maximilians-UniversityMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations