Individual Differences and Conceptual Modeling Task Performance: Examining the Effects of Cognitive Style, Self-efficacy, and Application Domain Knowledge
In information systems development, conceptual modeling, which includes both data modeling and process modeling, is the most effective technique for depicting and sharing an understanding of the functional capabilities and limitations of the product/ system/ service design. The quality of conceptual models depends on a number of factors. This research focused on attributes of the modeler and specifically examined how an individual’s cognitive style, task self-efficacy, and knowledge of application domain impact the quality of two types of conceptual models: data models and process models. Results of the research revealed that an individual’s cognitive style may relate to conceptual model quality. In addition, the research showed that self-efficacy may be a determinant of model quality. Application domain knowledge did not appear to play a role in quality of models produced by the participants in this study.
Keywordsindividual differences conceptual modeling modeling performance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
- 4.Compeau, D.R., Higgins, C.A.: A social cognitive theory perspective on individual reactions to computing technology. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Information Systems, New York (1991)Google Scholar
- 16.Jordan, D., Whalen, G., Bell, B., McKeown, K., Feiner, S.: An evaluation of automatically generated briefings of patient status. In: Medinfo. 2004 (2004)Google Scholar
- 21.Leung, F., Bolloju, N.: Analyzing the Quality of Domain Models Developed by Novice Systems Analysts. In: Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences (2005)Google Scholar
- 22.Jourdan, L.F., Bagwell, J.J., et al.: Motivational Orientation, Self-Regulated Learning Strategies and Students’ Choice of Teaching Model. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 8(1), 59–71 (2004)Google Scholar
- 23.McElroy, J.C., Hendrickson, A.R., et al.: Dispositional Factor in Internet Use: Personality Versus Cognitive Style. MIS Quarterly 31(4), 809–820 (2007)Google Scholar
- 25.Mason, R.O., Mitroff, I.I.: Challenging Strategic Planning Assumptions: Theory, cases, and techniques. Wiley, New York (1981)Google Scholar
- 26.Moody, M.: Best Friends. Riverhead Books (2002)Google Scholar
- 31.Shaft, T.M., Vessey, I.: The Role of Cognitive Fit in the Relationship Between Software Comprehension and Modification. MIS Quarterly 30(1), 29–55 (2006)Google Scholar
- 32.Simsion, G.: Data Modeling Theory and Practice. Technics Publications, LLC, Bradley Beach (2007)Google Scholar
- 33.Tiwana, A., McLean, E.R.: Expertise Integration and Creativity in Information Systems Development. Journal of Management Information Systems 22(1), 13–43 (2005)Google Scholar
- 36.Vessey, I.: The Effect of the Application Domain in IS Problem Solving: A Theoretical Analysis (2002)Google Scholar