Advertisement

Towards a Method for Realizing Sustained Competitive Advantage through Business Entity Analysis

  • Matteo Della Bordella
  • Rong Liu
  • Aurelio Ravarini
  • Frederick Y. Wu
  • Anil Nigam
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 81)

Abstract

Enterprises that succeed in today’s highly dynamic business environment often enjoy Sustained Competitive Advantage (SCA) as defined by Barney. While recent strategy literature focuses on exploring various sources of SCA, in this paper, we present an operational method for realizing SCA through Business Entity analysis. Business entity-centric modeling has been a successful approach in rethinking and revolutionizing business operations, in a number of engagements. Our method provides a path from SCA-generating strategies to Business Operations and Business Entities. The resulting Business Operations can be prototyped and analyzed to validate SCA properties. Our approach leverages key constructs from OMG’s Business Motivation Model (BMM) and emphasizes the analysis of Influencers – factors that have the capability to impact an enterprise’s strategies that generate SCA. Further, these strategies are used to formulate Business Operations that can be defined by Business Entities. IT applications can be generated from the Business Entities using Model-Driven Architecture. Therefore, these discovered Business Entities actually provide a valid scope for innovating Business Operations and developing IT applications that result in SCA for the business.

Keywords

Sustained Competitive Advantage Model-Driven Architecture Strategy Goal Objective Operation Influencers Business Entity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrahamsson, P., Hanhineva, A., Jäälinoja, J.: Improving Business Agility Through Technical Solutions: A Case Study on Test-Driven Development in Mobile Software Development. In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, vol. 180, pp. 227–243 (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1), 99–120 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bennet, A., Bennet, D.: Organizational Survival in the New World: The Intelligent Complex Adaptiven System. Elsevier Science, Burlington (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bharadwaj, A.S.: A Resource-Based Perspective on Information Technology Capability and Firm Performance: An Empirical Investigation. MIS Quarterly 24(1), 169–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bhattacharya, K., Caswell, N.S., Kumaran, S., Nigam, A., Wu, F.Y.: Artifact-centered operational modeling: lessons from customer engagements. IBM Systems Journal 46(4), 703–721 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bleistein, S.J., Cox, K., Verner, J., Phalp, K.T.: B-SCP: A requirements analysis framework for validating strategic alignment of organizational IT based on strategy, context and process. Information and Software Technology 48(9), 846–868 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Booch, G.: Object-oriented Analysis and Design with Applications, 3rd edn. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chao, T., Cohn, D., Flatgard, A., Hahn, S., Linehan, M., Nandi, P., Nigam, A., Pinel, F., Vergo, J., Wu, F.y.: Artifact-based transformation of IBM global financing. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 261–277. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    France, R., Rumple, B.: Model-driven Development of Complex Software: A Research Roadmap. In: Proceeding of 2007 Future of Software Engineering, FOSE 2007 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    George, M.L.: Lean Six Sigma - combining Six Sigma quality with Lean speed. McGraw-Hill, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grant, R.M.: The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review 33(3), 114–135 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hammer, M.: Deep Change: How Operational Innovation can transform your Company. Havard Business Review, 84–93 (April 2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Highsmith, J., Cockburn, A.: Agile software development: the business of innovation. Computer 34(9), 120–127 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jarvenpaa, S.L., Leidner, D. E.: An information company in Mexico: extending the resource-based view of the firm. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS (1997) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaplan, R., Norton, D.: The Balanced Scorecard – Measures That drive Performance. Harvard Business Review, 71–80 (1992)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kumaran, S.: Model Driven Enterprise. In: Proceedings of Global Integration Summit 2004, Banff, Canada (2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, J.: Model-Driven Business Transformation and Semantic Web. Communication of ACM 48(12), 75–77Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu, R., Wu, F.Y., Kumaran, S.: Transforming Activity-Centric Business Process Models into Information-Centric Models for SOA Solutions. Journal of Database Management 21(4), 14–34 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nigam, A., Caswell, N.S.: Business Artifacts: An approach Operational Specification. IBM Systems Journal 42(3), 428–445 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    OMG Business Motivation Model (BMM) Version 1.1, http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/1.1/ (2010-05-01)
  21. 21.
    OMG Model Driven Architecture (MDA) Guide Version 1.0.1, www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?omg/03-06-01 (March 6, 2001)
  22. 22.
    Pohle, G., Korsten, P., Ramamurthy, S.: The specialized enterprise: A fundamental redesign of firms and industries. IBM Institute for Business Value (March 2005), http://www-1.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/ibvstudy/imc/a1009224?cntxt=a1005266
  23. 23.
    Prahalad, C.K., Hamel, G.: The Core Competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 79–91 (May 1990)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Porter, M.E.: What Is Strategy. Harvard Business Review 32(1), 10–20 (1996)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramamurthy, S., Robinson, M.S.: Simplify to Succeed: Optimise the customer franchise and achieve operational scale: Retail financial institutions in 2005. IBM Business Consulting Services (2005), http://www-8.ibm.com/services/pdf/gw510-9108-00_fs_exec.pdf
  26. 26.
    Rockart, J.F.: The changing role of the information systems executive: a critical success factors perspective. Sloan Management Review (Fall 1982)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tsourveloudi, N., Valavanis, K.: On the Measurement of Enterprise Agility. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems 33, 329–342 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering: A Roundtrip from Research to Practice. In: Proc. International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE 2004), Kyoto, Japan (September 2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wade, M., Hulland, J.: Review: The Resource-Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, and Suggestions for Future Research. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 107–142 (2004)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weill, S., Broadbent, M.: IT Infrastructure for Strategic Agility, Working papers from Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management (2003), http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/1831
  31. 31.
    Yu, E., Liu, L.: Modelling trust for system design using the i* strategic actors framework. In: Falcone, R., Singh, M., Tan, Y.-H. (eds.) AA-WS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2246, p. 175. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matteo Della Bordella
    • 1
  • Rong Liu
    • 2
  • Aurelio Ravarini
    • 1
  • Frederick Y. Wu
    • 2
  • Anil Nigam
    • 2
  1. 1.LIUC, CeticUniversità Carlo CattaneoCastellanzaItaly
  2. 2.IBM T.J. Watson Research CenterNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations