Advertisement

Abstract

Despite the widespread adoption of BPM, there exist many business processes not adequately supported by existing BPM technology. In previous work we reported on the properties of these processes. As a major insight we learned that, in accordance to the data model comprising object types and object relations, the modeling and execution of processes can be based on two levels of granularity: object behavior and object interactions. This paper focuses on micro processes capturing object behavior and constituting a fundamental pillar of our framework for object-aware process management. Our approach applies the well established concept of modeling object behavior in terms of states and state transitions. Opposed to existing work, we establish a mapping between attribute values and objects states to ensure compliance between them. Finally, we provide a well-defined operational semantics enabling the automatic and dynamic generation of most end-user components at run-time (e.g., overview tables and user forms).

Keywords

Object-aware Processes Data-driven Process Execution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M.: Business Process Management: A Survey. In: van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Weske, M. (eds.) BPM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2678, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Silver, B.: Case Management: Addressing unique BPM Requirements. BPMS Watch, 1–12 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van der Aalst, W., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case Handling: A new Paradigm for Business Process Support. DKE 53(2), 129–162 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sadiq, S.W., Orlowska, M.E., Sadiq, W., Schulz, K.: When workflows will not deliver: The case of contradicting work practice. In: Proc. BIS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: PHILharmonicFlows: Towards a Framework for Object-aware Process Management. Journal of Software Maintenance and Evolution: Research and Practice (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Müller, D., Reichert, M., Herbst, J.: Data-Driven Modeling and Coordination of Large Process Structures. In: Chung, S. (ed.) OTM 2007, Part I. LNCS, vol. 4803, pp. 131–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gerede, C.E., Su, J.: Specification and Verification of Artifact Behaviors in Business Process Models. In: Krämer, B.J., Lin, K.-J., Narasimhan, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4749, pp. 181–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bhattacharya, K., Hull, R., Su, J.: A Data-Centric Design Methodology for Business Processes. In: Handbook of Research on Business Process Management, pp. 503–531. IGI Global (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Küster, J.M., Ryndina, K., Gall, H.C.: Generation of Business Process Models for Object Life Cycle Compliance. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 165–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Redding, G., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Iordachescu, A.: Transforming Object-Oriented Models to Process-Oriented Models. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 132–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Redding, G.M., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Iordachescu, A.: A flexible, object-centric approach for business process modelling. In: SOCA, pp. 1–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Reijers, H.A., Liman, S., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Product-Based Workflow Design. Management Information Systems 20(1), 229–262 (2003)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vanderfeesten, I.T.P., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Product Based Workflow Support: Dynamic Workflow Execution. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 571–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: Towards Object-Aware Process Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, Benefits. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 29, pp. 197–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Künzle, V., Reichert, M.: Integrating Users in Object-aware Process Management Systems: Issues and Challenges. In: Proc. BPM 2009 Workshop, pp. 29–41 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Künzle, V., Weber, B., Reichert, M.: Object-aware Business Processes: Fundamental Requirements and their Support in Existing Approaches. International Journal of Information System Modeling and Design 2(2) (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dijkstra, E.: A Discipline of Programming. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1976)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dori, D.: Object-Process Methodology. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vera Künzle
    • 1
  • Manfred Reichert
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Databases and Information SystemsUlm UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations