Advertisement

The Impact of Robots Language Form on People’s Perception of Robots

  • Yunkyung Kim
  • Sonya S. Kwak
  • Myung-suk Kim
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6776)

Abstract

Robots in people’s daily life have social relationships with human. This study investigated how the expression of social relationship in human communication is applied to human-robot relationship. We expressed two axes of social relationship through robots’ verbal language. In a 2 (address: calling participants’ name vs. not calling participants’ name) x 2 (speech style: honorific vs. familiar) between-participants experiment (N=60), participants experienced one of four types of the robot and evaluate the robot’s friendliness and dominance. Participants rated robots friendlier when it called their name than when it didn’t call their name. In the case of robots’ dominance, there was no significant difference in whether the robot called participants’ name as well as the robot’s forms of language. Based on the experiment results, we discussed the use of a social relationship concept for designing robots’ dialogue.

Keywords

Human-Robot Interaction Robot dialogue Interpersonal traits Social relationship 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nass, C., Steuer, J.S., Tauber, E.: Computers are social actors. In: SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Celebrating Interdependence, pp. 72–77. ACM Press, New York (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schmitt, M.H.: Near and Far: A re-formulation of the social distance concept. Sociology and Social Research 57(1), 85–97 (1972)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berscheid, E., Walster, E.H., Hatfield, E.: Interpersonal Attraction. Addison-Wesley, MA (1969)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kiesler, S., Goetz, J.: Mental Models and Cooperation with Robotic Assistants. In: Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 576–577. IEEE Press, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4), 143–166 (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kriz, S., Anderson, G., Gregory Trafton, J.: Robot-directed speech: using language to assess first-time users’ conceptualizations of a robot. In: The 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2010), pp. 267–274 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gockley, R., Bruce, A., Forlizzi, J., Michalowski, M., Mundell, A., Rosenthal, S., Sellner, B., Simmons, R., Snipes, K., Schultz, A.C., Wang, J.: Designing robots for long-term social interaction. In: Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2005), pp. 1338–1343 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, M.K., Kiesler, S., Forlizzi, J., Srinivasa, S., Rybski, P.: Gracefully mitigating breakdowns in robotic services. In: The 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI 2010), pp. 203–210 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., Ishiguro, H.: Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 61–84 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nourbakhsh, I., Bobenage, J., Grange, S., Lutz, R., Meyer, R., Soto, A.: An affective mobile robot educator with a full-time job. Artificial Intelligence 114(1-2), 95–124 (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sidner, C., Lee, C.: Robots as laboratory hosts. Interactions 12(2), 16–24 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rosenfeld, H.M.: Approval-seeking and approval-inducing functions of verbal and nonverbal responses in the dyad. J. Personality and Social Psychology 4(6), 597–605 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brown, R., Ford, M.: Address in American English. J. Abnormal and Social Psychology 62(2), 375–385 (1961)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, S.: Le nom et le theatre moderne dans Les amants du Metro. d’etudes de la culture francaise et des arts en France 13, 1–17 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Politeness: Some Universals in Language Use. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, I., Robert Ramsey, S.: The Korean Language. State University of New York Press (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Brown, L.: The honorifics systems of Korean language learners. SOAS-AKS Working Papers in Korean Studies, Dept. of Japan & Korea. London Univ. (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, Y., Kwak, S.S., Kim, M.: Effects of Social Relationships on People’s Acceptance of Robots: Using Forms of Language by Robots. In: The 7th International Conference on Ubiquitous Robots and Ambient Intelligence (URAI 2010), pp. 85–88 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gill, M.J., Swann, W.B., Silvera, D.H.: On the genesis of confidence. J. Personality and Social Psychology 75, 1101–1114 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gould, J.D., Conti, J., Hovanyecz, T.: Composing letters with a simulated listening typewriter. Communications of the ACM 26(4), 295–308 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McCrae, R., Costa, P.T.: The structure of interpersonal traits: Wiggin’s circumplex and the five factor model. J. Personality and Social Psychology 56(5), 586–595 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yun, J.: Development and Validation of Korean Interpersonal Adjective Scales (KIAS). MS.diss., Dept. of Counseling Psychology, Catholic Univ., Seoul, Republic of Korea (2003)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wiggins, J.S., Trapnell, P., Phillips, N.: Psychometric and Geometric Characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective Scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research 23(4), 517–530 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Altman, I., Taylor, D.A.: Socialpenetration: The development of interpersonal relationships. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Derlega, V.J., Metts, S., Petronio, S., Margulis, S.T.: Selfdisclosure. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jourard, S.M.: Self-disclosure: An experimental analysis of the transparent self. Wiley, New York (1971)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunkyung Kim
    • 1
  • Sonya S. Kwak
    • 1
  • Myung-suk Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Industrial DesignKAISTDaejeonRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations