2D vs. 3D Pain Visualization: User Preferences in a Spinal Cord Injury Cohort

  • Fotios Spyridonis
  • Gheorghita Ghinea
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6769)

Abstract

Research on pain experienced after Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) has revealed that not only are there several types of pain present in the same individual with this kind of trauma, but also that people who suffer such an injury can describe the characteristics of the same type of pain in different ways. Making it possible, therefore, to more precisely describe pain experience could prove to be vital for an increased quality of life. Accordingly, fifteen individuals with pain after SCI were asked to describe their pain experience using a 3 Dimensional (3D) model of the human body that could be used as an aid in communicating their pain. The results of this study suggest that the consensus of the participants approved the ability of the 3D model to more accurately describe their pain, an encouraging outcome towards the use of 3D technology in support of post SCI pain rehabilitation.

Keywords

Rehabilitation Chronic Pain Spinal Cord Injury 3D Visualization Pain Drawing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Broeren, J., Sunnerhagen, K.S., Rydmark, M.: Haptic virtual rehabilitation in stroke: transferring research into clinical practice. Physical Therapy Reviews 14(5), 322–335 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ciocca, L., Fantini, M., Marchetti, C., Scotti, R., Monaco, C.: Immediate facial rehabilitation in cancer patients using CAD-CAM and rapid prototyping technology: a pilot study. Support Care Cancer 18, 723–728 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coll, A.M., Ameen, J.R.M., Mead, D.: Postoperative pain assessment tools in day surgery: literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 46(2), 124–133 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Felix, E.R., Cruz-Almeida, Y., Widerstrom-Noga, E.G.: Chronic pain after spinal cord injury: What characteristics make some pains more disturbing than others? Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 44(5), 703–716 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Felix, E.R., Galoian, K.A., Aarons, C., Brown, M.D., Kearing, S.A., Heiss, U.: Utility of quantitative computerized pain drawings in a sample of spinal stenosis patients. Pain Medicine 11(3), 382–389 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghinea, G., Spyridonis, F., Serif, T., Frank, A.O.: 3-D Pain Drawings-Mobile Data Collection Using a PDA. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 12(1), 27–33 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Haefeli, M., Elfering, A.: Pain assessment. European Spine Journal 15, 17–24 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jamison, R.N., Fanciullo, G.J., Baird, J.C.: Usefulness of Pain Drawings in Identifying Real or Imagined Pain: Accuracy of Pain Professionals, Non professionals, and a Decision Model. The Journal of Pain 5(9), 476–482 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lee, S.J.: Pain measurement: Understanding existing tools and their application in the emergency department. Emergency Medicine 13, 279–287 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mannion, A.F., Balague, F., Pellise, F., Cedraschi, C.: Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nature Clinical Practice Rheumatology 3(11), 610–618 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mooney, V., Cairns, D., Robertson, J.: A system for evaluating and treating chronic back disability. West J. Med. 124, 370–376 (1976)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ohnmeiss, D.D.: Repeatability of Pain Drawings in a Low Back Pain Population. Spine 25(8), 980–988 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Provenzano, D.A., Fanciullo, G.J., Jamison, R.N., McHugo, G.J., Baird, J.C.: Computer Assessment and Diagnostic Classification of Chronic Pain Patients. Pain Medicine 8 (S3), 167–175 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ransford, A.O., Cairns, D., Mooney, V.: The Pain Drawing as an Aid to Psychologic Evaluation of Patients with Low-Back pain. Spine 1(2), 127–134 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samuelsson, K., Larsson, H., Thyberg, M., Tropp, H.: Back Pain and Spinal Deformity-Common Among Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injuries. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy 3(1), 28–32 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Siddall, P.J., Yezierski, R.P., Loeser, J.D.: Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury: Clinical Features, Prevalence, and Taxonomy. IASP Press, Seattle (2000); IASP Newsletter 3Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Spinal Injuries Association (SIA): Impact Reports and Financial Statements (2009), http://www.spinal.co.uk/page/Reports-and-Accounts
  18. 18.
    Takata, K., Hirotani, H.: Pain drawing in the evaluation of low back pain. International Orthopaedics, 361-366 (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang, M.Y., O’Shaugnessy, B., Haq, I., Green, B.A.: Pain Following Spinal Cord Injury. Seminars in Neurosurgery 15(1), 99–105 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fotios Spyridonis
    • 1
  • Gheorghita Ghinea
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information Systems and ComputingBrunel UniversityUxbridgeUK

Personalised recommendations