Advertisement

Friendship Display Medium in Response to Academic Major Influences in Visuospatial Abilities

  • Yen-Yu Kang
  • Chih-Long Lin
  • Shu-Hsuan Chang
  • Mao-Jiun J. Wang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6775)

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of display medium (tablet PC, paper-pencil), academic major (design, technology major) and gender on visuospatial ability tests, visuospatial short-term memory test, visual fatigue, subjective preference and mental workload. Sixty university students participated in the study. The results indicate that the display medium had a significant effect on all measurements (p<0.001). When using a paper-pencil test, the visuospatial test performance was higher, visual fatigue and mental workload were lower than using the tablet PC test. The interaction effect of display medium and academic major is significant on visuospatial test performance. The design major students performed better on visuospatial ability test but worse on visuospatial short-term memory test than technology major students under the tablet PC test. The gender effect is not significant on all measurements. When assessing visuospatial ability using the tablet PC based test, it should be noticed that the visuospatial ability may be underestimated especial for male testers or design major students.

Keywords

visuospatial ability visuospatial short-term memory display academic major gender 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Alescio-Lautier, B., Michel, B.F., Herrera, C., Elahmadi, A., Chambon, C., Touzet, C., Paban, V.: Visual and visuospatial short-term memory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease: Role of attention. Neuropsychologia 45(8), 1948–1960 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anastakis, D.J., Hamstra, S.J., Matsumoto, E.D.: Visual-spatial abilities in surgical training. The American Journal of Surgery 179(6), 469–471 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baenninger, M., Newcombe, N.: Environmental input to the development of sex-related differences in spatial and mathematical ability. Learning and Individual Differences 7(4), 363–379 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bennet, G.K., Seashore, H.G., Wesman, A.G.: Differential aptitude test: Spatial relations (Form T). Psychology Corporation, New York (1972)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borg, G.: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise 14(5), 377–381 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chung, S.-C., Lee, B., Tack, G.-R., Yi, J.-H., Lee, H.-W., Kwon, J.-H., Choi, M.-H., Eom, J.-S., Sohn, J.-H.: Physiological mechanism underlying the improvement in visuospatial performance due to 30% oxygen inhalation. Applied Ergonomics 39(2), 166–170 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crawford, M., Chaffin, R., Fitton, L.: Cognition in social context. Learning and Individual Differences 7(4), 341–362 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H., Dermen, D.: Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service, Princeton (1976)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garg, A.X., Norman, G., Sperotable, L.: How medical students learn spatial anatomy. The Lancet 357(9253), 363–364 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gathercole, S.E., Alloway, T.P., Willis, C., Adams, A.M.: Working memory in children with reading disabilities. Jour. of Experimental Child Psychology 93(3), 265–281 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E., Peter, A.H.A.N.M.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. Advances in Psychology, 139–183 (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kail, R., Park, Y.-S.: Impact of practice on speed of mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 49, 227–244 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang, Y.-Y., Wang, M.-J.J., Lin, R.: Usability evaluation of e-books. Displays 30(2), 49–52 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Linn, M.C., Petersen, A.C.: Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development 56(6), 1479–1498 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Loring-Meier, S., Halpern, D.F.: Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6(3), 464–471 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mcgee, M.G.: Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences. Psychological Bulletin 86(5), 889–918 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Rettinger, D.A., Shah, P., Hegarty, M.: How are visuospatial working memory, executive functioning, and spatial abilities related? A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130(4), 621–640 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Perry, R.J., Hodges, J.R.: Attention and executive deficits in Alzheimer’s disease: A critical review. Brain 122(3), 383–404 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Quaiser-Pohl, C., Lehmann, W.: Girls Spatial abilities: Charting the contributions of experiences and attitudes in different academic groups. British Journal of Educational Psychology 72, 245–260 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Razumnikova, O.: Role, sex and professional orientation of students as creativity factors. Voprosy Psihologii 1, 111–118 (2002)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rizzo, M., Anderson, S.W., Dawson, J., Myers, R., Ball, K.: Visual attention impairments in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 54(10), 1954–1959 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Shah, P., Miyake, A.: The separability of working memory resources for spatial thinking and language processing: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125(1), 4–27 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shieh, K.K., Chen, M.H., Wang, Y.W.: Effects of display medium and luminance contrast on memory performance and EEG response. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 35(9), 797–805 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vlachos, F., Andreou, G., Andreou, E.: Biological and environmental influences in visuospatial abilities. Learning and Individual Differences 13(4), 339–347 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, M.J.J., Huang, C.L.: Evaluating the eye fatigue problem in wafer inspection. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing 17(3), 444–447 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weiss, E.M., Kemmler, G., Deisenhammer, E.A., Fleischhacker, W.W., Delazer, M.: Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences 35(4), 863–875 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yen-Yu Kang
    • 1
  • Chih-Long Lin
    • 2
  • Shu-Hsuan Chang
    • 2
  • Mao-Jiun J. Wang
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. Industrial DesignNational Kaohsiung Normal UniversityYanchao ShiangTaiwan
  2. 2.Dept. of Crafts DesignNational Taiwan University of ArtsTaiwan
  3. 3.Dept. of Industrial Engineering and Engineering ManagementNational Tsing Hua UniversityTaiwan

Personalised recommendations